Brazilian dentists' knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards minimal intervention dentistry: development and psychometric analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2026-06-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2026.vol40.039
Regina Cardoso de Moura, Matheus França Perazzo, Soraya Coelho Leal, Lucianne Cople Maia, Carla Massignan
{"title":"Brazilian dentists' knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards minimal intervention dentistry: development and psychometric analysis.","authors":"Regina Cardoso de Moura, Matheus França Perazzo, Soraya Coelho Leal, Lucianne Cople Maia, Carla Massignan","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2026.vol40.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To date, no instrument with demonstrated structural validity has been available to assess dentists' knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding the core concepts of Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID). Therefore, this study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a self-administered instrument designed to measure Brazilian dentists' knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards MID. A cross-sectional study was conducted among dentists practicing in the Federal District of Brazil to evaluate the psychometric properties of the instrument. Item generation was followed by expert review by Brazilian MID specialists. Subsequently, two focus groups and a pre-test were conducted to assess item wording, sequence, and comprehensibility. After the necessary revisions, the instrument was administered to 454 dentists. Exploratory Factor Analysis, combined with parallel analysis, was performed (p < 0.05). A total of 404 dentists comprised the final sample for the psychometric analyses. Parallel analysis indicated a two-factor solution as the most representative, corresponding to knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Composite reliability was adequate for all factors (≥ 0.40). The factorial structure showed acceptable model fit indices, except for the RMSEA (RMSEA = 0.092). Unidimensionality was rejected, as UniCo = 0.939 (0.907-0.975) and ECV = 0.762 (0.719-0.830) did not reach the recommended thresholds. The findings suggest that the instrument presents an appropriate structure and satisfactory reliability for measuring dentists' knowledge, skills, and attitudes related to MID. This is the first study in the field of MID competencies to comprehensively report the steps involved in constructing, adapting, and psychometrically evaluating an instrument for dentists.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":"40 ","pages":"e039"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13286577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2026.vol40.039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To date, no instrument with demonstrated structural validity has been available to assess dentists' knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding the core concepts of Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID). Therefore, this study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a self-administered instrument designed to measure Brazilian dentists' knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards MID. A cross-sectional study was conducted among dentists practicing in the Federal District of Brazil to evaluate the psychometric properties of the instrument. Item generation was followed by expert review by Brazilian MID specialists. Subsequently, two focus groups and a pre-test were conducted to assess item wording, sequence, and comprehensibility. After the necessary revisions, the instrument was administered to 454 dentists. Exploratory Factor Analysis, combined with parallel analysis, was performed (p < 0.05). A total of 404 dentists comprised the final sample for the psychometric analyses. Parallel analysis indicated a two-factor solution as the most representative, corresponding to knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Composite reliability was adequate for all factors (≥ 0.40). The factorial structure showed acceptable model fit indices, except for the RMSEA (RMSEA = 0.092). Unidimensionality was rejected, as UniCo = 0.939 (0.907-0.975) and ECV = 0.762 (0.719-0.830) did not reach the recommended thresholds. The findings suggest that the instrument presents an appropriate structure and satisfactory reliability for measuring dentists' knowledge, skills, and attitudes related to MID. This is the first study in the field of MID competencies to comprehensively report the steps involved in constructing, adapting, and psychometrically evaluating an instrument for dentists.

巴西牙医对最小干预牙科的知识、技能和态度:发展和心理测量分析。
迄今为止,没有证明结构有效性的工具可用于评估牙医关于最小干预牙科(MID)核心概念的知识、技能和态度。因此,本研究旨在开发和评估一种自我管理的工具的心理测量特性,该工具旨在测量巴西牙医对MID的知识、技能和态度。在巴西联邦区执业的牙医中进行了一项横断面研究,以评估该工具的心理测量特性。项目生成后由巴西MID专家进行专家评审。随后,进行了两个焦点小组和一个预测试,以评估项目的措辞、顺序和可理解性。经过必要的修改后,该仪器被用于454名牙医。探索性因素分析结合平行分析(p < 0.05)。总共404名牙医组成了心理测量分析的最终样本。并行分析表明,双因素解决方案最具代表性,对应于知识,技能和态度。所有因素的复合信度均足够(≥0.40)。除RMSEA (RMSEA = 0.092)外,析因结构显示出可接受的模型拟合指标。由于UniCo = 0.939(0.907-0.975)和ECV = 0.762(0.719-0.830)未达到推荐阈值,单维性被拒绝。研究结果表明,该工具具有适当的结构和令人满意的可靠性,可用于测量牙医与MID相关的知识、技能和态度。这是MID能力领域第一个全面报告牙医构建、调整和心理测量学评估工具所涉及的步骤的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书