Predicting Risk Factors of Pressure Injury for Perioperative Patients Through Machine Learning With SHapley Additive exPlanations Based on Hospital Information System.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-25 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000495
Guirong Shi, Xin Xu, Peipei Zhang, Ping Huang, Qingyuan Gong, Ping Liu, Liping Jiang
{"title":"Predicting Risk Factors of Pressure Injury for Perioperative Patients Through Machine Learning With SHapley Additive exPlanations Based on Hospital Information System.","authors":"Guirong Shi, Xin Xu, Peipei Zhang, Ping Huang, Qingyuan Gong, Ping Liu, Liping Jiang","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Perioperative pressure injuries (PIs) are a common complication of surgical hospitalization that can lead to serious health problems, compromise wound healing, and cause infections. This study aimed to predict the early risk of PI in perioperative patients by developing an interpretable machine-learning model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data of perioperative surgical inpatients in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai from 2017 to 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, covering a total of 14,416 patients for screening. Feature variables were selected using the XGBoost model. Seven machine-learning (ML) models were employed to predict these variables. To evaluate the performance of these prediction models, various metrics such as accuracy, recall, and area under the curve were employed. In addition, a 10-fold cross-validation method was implemented to ensure the generalizability of the models. Furthermore, this study incorporated SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to visualize and elucidate the significance of each factor involved. This study was reported using the TRIPOD checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 7 ML models developed, both the Random Forest model and the XGBoost model exhibited exceptional performance. In addition, the study incorporated the SHAP framework to enhance the interpretability of these models. The importance of SHAP variables in the model from high to low were operation duration, age, serum albumin, body mass index, body temperature, and anesthesia grade.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ML model developed in this study demonstrated strong performance in predicting perioperative PIs. Furthermore, the SHAP method offered valuable insights for interpreting the ML model.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":"371-377"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Perioperative pressure injuries (PIs) are a common complication of surgical hospitalization that can lead to serious health problems, compromise wound healing, and cause infections. This study aimed to predict the early risk of PI in perioperative patients by developing an interpretable machine-learning model.

Methods: Clinical data of perioperative surgical inpatients in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai from 2017 to 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, covering a total of 14,416 patients for screening. Feature variables were selected using the XGBoost model. Seven machine-learning (ML) models were employed to predict these variables. To evaluate the performance of these prediction models, various metrics such as accuracy, recall, and area under the curve were employed. In addition, a 10-fold cross-validation method was implemented to ensure the generalizability of the models. Furthermore, this study incorporated SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to visualize and elucidate the significance of each factor involved. This study was reported using the TRIPOD checklist.

Results: In the 7 ML models developed, both the Random Forest model and the XGBoost model exhibited exceptional performance. In addition, the study incorporated the SHAP framework to enhance the interpretability of these models. The importance of SHAP variables in the model from high to low were operation duration, age, serum albumin, body mass index, body temperature, and anesthesia grade.

Conclusions: The ML model developed in this study demonstrated strong performance in predicting perioperative PIs. Furthermore, the SHAP method offered valuable insights for interpreting the ML model.

基于医院信息系统的SHapley加性解释机器学习预测围手术期患者压力损伤危险因素
目的:围手术期压伤(PIs)是外科住院治疗的常见并发症,可导致严重的健康问题,影响伤口愈合,并引起感染。本研究旨在通过开发可解释的机器学习模型来预测围手术期患者PI的早期风险。方法:回顾性分析上海市某三级医院2017 - 2023年围手术期住院患者的临床资料,共筛选14416例患者。使用XGBoost模型选择特征变量。七个机器学习(ML)模型被用来预测这些变量。为了评估这些预测模型的性能,采用了各种指标,如准确率、召回率和曲线下面积。此外,为了保证模型的可泛化性,采用了10倍交叉验证方法。此外,本研究采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)值来可视化和阐明每个相关因素的重要性。本研究采用TRIPOD检查表进行报告。结果:在开发的7 ML模型中,随机森林模型和XGBoost模型均表现出优异的性能。此外,该研究还纳入了SHAP框架,以增强这些模型的可解释性。模型中SHAP变量的重要性由高到低依次为手术时间、年龄、血清白蛋白、体重指数、体温、麻醉程度。结论:本研究中建立的ML模型在预测围手术期pi方面表现出很强的性能。此外,SHAP方法为解释ML模型提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书