Who Benefits Most? Patient Selection for Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation in Heart Failure.

IF 4.3 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review Pub Date : 2026-05-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.15420/aer.2025.83
Aaron A Sifuentes, Mohammed Mhanna, Paari Dominic, Peter Farjo
{"title":"Who Benefits Most? Patient Selection for Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation in Heart Failure.","authors":"Aaron A Sifuentes, Mohammed Mhanna, Paari Dominic, Peter Farjo","doi":"10.15420/aer.2025.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AF and heart failure (HF) often coexist, amplifying morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation is an effective rhythm control strategy, particularly in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, where studies such as CASTLE-AF show improved survival, fewer HF hospitalisations and better quality of life. Evidence in HF with preserved ejection fraction is emerging; RAFT-AF included HF with preserved ejection fraction patients, but showed no significant primary outcome difference, though subgroup data offer insights across the HF spectrum. Procedural risks, influenced by patient frailty and device presence (e.g. left ventricular assist devices and CRT), necessitate careful selection and periprocedural optimisation. Advances in ablation technology, including pulsed field ablation, and adjunctive strategies show promise but require further validation. Early rhythm control, as supported by EAST-AFNET 4, may prevent adverse remodelling and improve outcomes if applied before extensive atrial disease develops. Future directions emphasise multidisciplinary, personalised approaches integrating imaging and biomarkers to optimise patient selection. Thoughtful application of catheter ablation can enhance outcomes in carefully selected HF patients with AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":8412,"journal":{"name":"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review","volume":"15 ","pages":"e21"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13284791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2025.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AF and heart failure (HF) often coexist, amplifying morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation is an effective rhythm control strategy, particularly in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, where studies such as CASTLE-AF show improved survival, fewer HF hospitalisations and better quality of life. Evidence in HF with preserved ejection fraction is emerging; RAFT-AF included HF with preserved ejection fraction patients, but showed no significant primary outcome difference, though subgroup data offer insights across the HF spectrum. Procedural risks, influenced by patient frailty and device presence (e.g. left ventricular assist devices and CRT), necessitate careful selection and periprocedural optimisation. Advances in ablation technology, including pulsed field ablation, and adjunctive strategies show promise but require further validation. Early rhythm control, as supported by EAST-AFNET 4, may prevent adverse remodelling and improve outcomes if applied before extensive atrial disease develops. Future directions emphasise multidisciplinary, personalised approaches integrating imaging and biomarkers to optimise patient selection. Thoughtful application of catheter ablation can enhance outcomes in carefully selected HF patients with AF.

谁受益最大?心力衰竭患者心房颤动导管消融的选择。
房颤和心力衰竭(HF)经常共存,增加了发病率和死亡率。导管消融是一种有效的心律控制策略,特别是在心力衰竭伴射血分数降低的情况下,CASTLE-AF等研究显示生存率提高,心衰住院率降低,生活质量提高。有证据表明HF患者的射血分数保存完好;RAFT-AF包括保留射血分数的HF患者,但没有显示显着的主要结局差异,尽管亚组数据提供了整个HF谱的见解。手术风险,受患者虚弱和设备存在(如左心室辅助装置和CRT)的影响,需要仔细选择和围手术期优化。包括脉冲场消融和辅助策略在内的消融技术的进步显示出了希望,但需要进一步验证。早期心律控制,如EAST-AFNET 4所支持的,如果在广泛的心房疾病发展之前应用,可能会预防不良重构并改善预后。未来的方向强调多学科,个性化的方法整合成像和生物标志物,以优化患者选择。精心挑选的心衰合并房颤患者,慎重应用导管消融可提高预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书