AI-driven differentiation of 2D proximal femur morphometry and hounsfield units for integrated forensic estimation of sex, stature, and age in a modern Thai dry bone sample.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Phannavich Malawan, Patara Rattanachet, Kittichai Wantanajittikul, Sukon Prasitwattanaseree, Tawachai Monum, Apichat Sinthubua, Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh
{"title":"AI-driven differentiation of 2D proximal femur morphometry and hounsfield units for integrated forensic estimation of sex, stature, and age in a modern Thai dry bone sample.","authors":"Phannavich Malawan, Patara Rattanachet, Kittichai Wantanajittikul, Sukon Prasitwattanaseree, Tawachai Monum, Apichat Sinthubua, Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh","doi":"10.1007/s12565-026-00952-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computed Tomography (CT) imaging has expanded possibilities for biological profile estimation in forensic contexts. This study examined whether two-dimensional (2D) morphometric measurements and Hounsfield Unit (HU) values derived from CT scans of dry proximal femora could reliably estimate sex, stature, and age, and whether machine learning (ML) could meaningfully improve on traditional methods. Three hundred left femora from Thai individuals were scanned, and mid-coronal sections were used to extract measurements from defined anatomical regions. For sex estimation, conventional estimation equations reached 93.2% accuracy, while Naïve Bayes classification achieved 96.5% as the best performance among the ML models tested. Stature estimation using sex-specific 2D parameters yielded a Standard Error of Estimate (SEE) of 4.43 cm, which dropped to 3.96 cm when Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) were applied. Age estimation relied on HU values, which showed a consistent negative relationship with age. The lowest SEE for age was 9.67 years from measurements at the Primary Tensile Line (PTL) and Ward's Triangle in females. Models also performed better when applied to older age groups. Although sex-specific equations outperformed mixed-sex ones, the latter were kept in the analysis as a practical alternative when sex cannot be established prior to analysis. Overall, 2D morphometrics proved most useful for sex and stature estimation, while HU values emerged as a reliable, quantitative approach to age estimation. ML consistently improved model performance across all three estimation tasks, supporting its role in modern forensic anthropological practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7816,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Science International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Science International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-026-00952-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computed Tomography (CT) imaging has expanded possibilities for biological profile estimation in forensic contexts. This study examined whether two-dimensional (2D) morphometric measurements and Hounsfield Unit (HU) values derived from CT scans of dry proximal femora could reliably estimate sex, stature, and age, and whether machine learning (ML) could meaningfully improve on traditional methods. Three hundred left femora from Thai individuals were scanned, and mid-coronal sections were used to extract measurements from defined anatomical regions. For sex estimation, conventional estimation equations reached 93.2% accuracy, while Naïve Bayes classification achieved 96.5% as the best performance among the ML models tested. Stature estimation using sex-specific 2D parameters yielded a Standard Error of Estimate (SEE) of 4.43 cm, which dropped to 3.96 cm when Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) were applied. Age estimation relied on HU values, which showed a consistent negative relationship with age. The lowest SEE for age was 9.67 years from measurements at the Primary Tensile Line (PTL) and Ward's Triangle in females. Models also performed better when applied to older age groups. Although sex-specific equations outperformed mixed-sex ones, the latter were kept in the analysis as a practical alternative when sex cannot be established prior to analysis. Overall, 2D morphometrics proved most useful for sex and stature estimation, while HU values emerged as a reliable, quantitative approach to age estimation. ML consistently improved model performance across all three estimation tasks, supporting its role in modern forensic anthropological practice.

人工智能驱动的二维股骨近端形态测量和hounsfield单位的分化,用于对现代泰国干骨样本的性别、身高和年龄进行综合法医估计。
计算机断层扫描(CT)成像扩大了法医环境中生物剖面估计的可能性。本研究检验了二维(2D)形态测量和干股骨近端CT扫描得出的Hounsfield单位(HU)值是否可以可靠地估计性别、身高和年龄,以及机器学习(ML)是否可以对传统方法进行有意义的改进。对300个泰国人的左股骨进行扫描,并使用中冠状切片从定义的解剖区域提取测量值。对于性别估计,传统估计方程的准确率达到93.2%,而Naïve贝叶斯分类达到96.5%,是所测试的ML模型中性能最好的。基于性别的2D参数估算身高的标准误差(SEE)为4.43 cm,而采用支持向量机(SVM)和高斯过程回归(GPR)的标准误差降至3.96 cm。年龄估计依赖于HU值,HU值与年龄呈一致的负相关。从主要张力线(PTL)和沃德三角测量,女性最低年龄SEE为9.67岁。当模型应用于年龄较大的群体时,表现也更好。虽然性别特定方程优于混合性别方程,但当性别无法在分析之前确定时,后者被保留在分析中作为一种实用的替代方案。总的来说,二维形态计量学被证明对性别和身高估计最有用,而HU值则是一种可靠的、定量的年龄估计方法。ML在所有三个估计任务中不断提高模型性能,支持其在现代法医人类学实践中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anatomical Science International
Anatomical Science International 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The official English journal of the Japanese Association of Anatomists, Anatomical Science International (formerly titled Kaibogaku Zasshi) publishes original research articles dealing with morphological sciences. Coverage in the journal includes molecular, cellular, histological and gross anatomical studies on humans and on normal and experimental animals, as well as functional morphological, biochemical, physiological and behavioral studies if they include morphological analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书