{"title":"On Cu-Cu bonding in paddle-wheel copper(II) acetates","authors":"Ingrid Jelemenska, Martin Breza","doi":"10.1007/s11243-026-00750-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Starting from the X-ray structure of [Cu<sub>2</sub>(µ<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub>CCH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>]<sup>0</sup>•2H<sub>2</sub>O, the structures of [Cu<sub>2</sub>(CH<sub>3</sub>COO)<sub>n</sub>]<sup>q</sup>, <i>n</i> = 1 → 4, with charges q = 4-n and 2-n for the oxidation states Cu(II) and Cu(I), respectively, were optimized in the singlet and triplet ground spin states. Their electronic structures were evaluated in terms of Quantum Theory of Atoms-in-Molecule (QTAIM). Molecular graphs of Cu(II) complexes with two or fewer acetate bridges exhibit no Cu-Cu bonding. Their Cu-Cu distances decrease with the number of acetate ligands. The O-O distances in the same carboxyl group are always shorter than the Cu-Cu ones, therefore, it can be concluded that two or fewer carboxylate bridges are not sufficient to press both Cu atoms together to form a bond critical point (BCP) between them. Hypothetical dicopper(I) acetates exhibit the BCP between both Cu atoms even in <sup>3</sup>[Cu<sub>2</sub>(µ<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub>CCH<sub>3</sub>)]<sup>+</sup> unlike its unbridged singlet counterpart. The instability of the hypothetical [Cu<sub>2</sub>(µ<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub>CCH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>]<sup>2−</sup> complex can be ascribed to the limited coordination number of Cu(I) central atoms (with subsequent Cu-O bond splitting). The QTAIM characteristics of the BCPs between both Cu atoms in all complexes under study are not sufficient to distinguish true Cu-Cu bonding from an artifact of pressing both copper atoms together by carboxylate bridges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":803,"journal":{"name":"Transition Metal Chemistry","volume":"51 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11243-026-00750-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transition Metal Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11243-026-00750-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Starting from the X-ray structure of [Cu2(µ2-O2CCH3)4]0•2H2O, the structures of [Cu2(CH3COO)n]q, n = 1 → 4, with charges q = 4-n and 2-n for the oxidation states Cu(II) and Cu(I), respectively, were optimized in the singlet and triplet ground spin states. Their electronic structures were evaluated in terms of Quantum Theory of Atoms-in-Molecule (QTAIM). Molecular graphs of Cu(II) complexes with two or fewer acetate bridges exhibit no Cu-Cu bonding. Their Cu-Cu distances decrease with the number of acetate ligands. The O-O distances in the same carboxyl group are always shorter than the Cu-Cu ones, therefore, it can be concluded that two or fewer carboxylate bridges are not sufficient to press both Cu atoms together to form a bond critical point (BCP) between them. Hypothetical dicopper(I) acetates exhibit the BCP between both Cu atoms even in 3[Cu2(µ2-O2CCH3)]+ unlike its unbridged singlet counterpart. The instability of the hypothetical [Cu2(µ2-O2CCH3)4]2− complex can be ascribed to the limited coordination number of Cu(I) central atoms (with subsequent Cu-O bond splitting). The QTAIM characteristics of the BCPs between both Cu atoms in all complexes under study are not sufficient to distinguish true Cu-Cu bonding from an artifact of pressing both copper atoms together by carboxylate bridges.
期刊介绍:
Transition Metal Chemistry is an international journal designed to deal with all aspects of the subject embodied in the title: the preparation of transition metal-based molecular compounds of all kinds (including complexes of the Group 12 elements), their structural, physical, kinetic, catalytic and biological properties, their use in chemical synthesis as well as their application in the widest context, their role in naturally occurring systems etc.
Manuscripts submitted to the journal should be of broad appeal to the readership and for this reason, papers which are confined to more specialised studies such as the measurement of solution phase equilibria or thermal decomposition studies, or papers which include extensive material on f-block elements, or papers dealing with non-molecular materials, will not normally be considered for publication. Work describing new ligands or coordination geometries must provide sufficient evidence for the confident assignment of structural formulae; this will usually take the form of one or more X-ray crystal structures.