DIFFERENCES IN TEACHING AND LEARNING CONCEPT NETWORKS OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS ACCORDING TO ACHIEVEMENT LEVELS

IF 1.4 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Youngshin Kim, Hyunju Chun, Soo-min Lim
{"title":"DIFFERENCES IN TEACHING AND LEARNING CONCEPT NETWORKS OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS ACCORDING TO ACHIEVEMENT LEVELS","authors":"Youngshin Kim, Hyunju Chun, Soo-min Lim","doi":"10.33225/jbse/26.25.282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students comprehend most science concepts through in-class learning. Therefore, how teachers present concepts can decisively influence students’ understanding of scientific concepts. Accordingly, this study aimed to identify implications for concept teaching and learning by comparing the conceptual structure of photosynthesis reflected in the teaching concept networks used by teachers with the learning concept networks constructed by students. In this process, the construct of the concept network taught by the teacher and the concepts learned by students at each achievement level were compared and analysed using semantic network analysis. The concepts taught by the teacher and those learned by the students were largely similar, but the strength and complexity of the connections between concepts differed. Moreover, the teacher did not clearly distinguish between subtopics while teaching. As a result, the students recognised the concepts but often failed to distinguish between subtopics. High-achievers learned more concepts and showed a more complex connection between concepts than low-achievers. The findings suggest that teachers should explain scientific concepts by breaking them down into subtopics and presenting them in smaller, interconnected chunks to help students relate new knowledge to existing knowledge. Keywords: achievement level, concept network, connected concept network, learning concept, teaching concept","PeriodicalId":46424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Baltic Science Education","volume":"25 2","pages":"282-282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Baltic Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/26.25.282","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Students comprehend most science concepts through in-class learning. Therefore, how teachers present concepts can decisively influence students’ understanding of scientific concepts. Accordingly, this study aimed to identify implications for concept teaching and learning by comparing the conceptual structure of photosynthesis reflected in the teaching concept networks used by teachers with the learning concept networks constructed by students. In this process, the construct of the concept network taught by the teacher and the concepts learned by students at each achievement level were compared and analysed using semantic network analysis. The concepts taught by the teacher and those learned by the students were largely similar, but the strength and complexity of the connections between concepts differed. Moreover, the teacher did not clearly distinguish between subtopics while teaching. As a result, the students recognised the concepts but often failed to distinguish between subtopics. High-achievers learned more concepts and showed a more complex connection between concepts than low-achievers. The findings suggest that teachers should explain scientific concepts by breaking them down into subtopics and presenting them in smaller, interconnected chunks to help students relate new knowledge to existing knowledge. Keywords: achievement level, concept network, connected concept network, learning concept, teaching concept
不同成绩水平的光合作用概念网络教学差异
学生通过课堂学习理解大部分科学概念。因此,教师如何呈现概念对学生对科学概念的理解有着决定性的影响。因此,本研究旨在通过比较教师使用的教学概念网络和学生构建的学习概念网络所反映的光合作用的概念结构,来确定概念教与学的意义。在此过程中,使用语义网络分析法对教师讲授的概念网络的构建与各成绩水平学生所学的概念进行比较和分析。老师教的概念和学生学的概念在很大程度上是相似的,但是概念之间联系的强度和复杂性不同。此外,老师在教学过程中没有明确区分子主题。结果,学生们认识到概念,但往往不能区分副标题。高成就者比低成就者学到了更多的概念,并且在概念之间表现出更复杂的联系。研究结果表明,教师应该将科学概念分解成小主题,并以更小的、相互关联的块来呈现,以帮助学生将新知识与现有知识联系起来。关键词:成就水平、概念网络、连接概念网络、学习概念、教学概念
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Baltic Science Education
Journal of Baltic Science Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书