Yield of Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Adults Aged 45-49 vs 50-54 years.

Le Wang,Chen Zhu,Yu Qiu,Weimiao Wu,Tingting Pan,Weiwei Gong,Shi Wang,Wei Wu,Dong Hang,Ni Li,Partha Basu,Lingbin Du
{"title":"Yield of Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Adults Aged 45-49 vs 50-54 years.","authors":"Le Wang,Chen Zhu,Yu Qiu,Weimiao Wu,Tingting Pan,Weiwei Gong,Shi Wang,Wei Wu,Dong Hang,Ni Li,Partha Basu,Lingbin Du","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000004087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe rising incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) has prompted debate over lowering screening initiation age. However, real-world evidence on fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening effectiveness in 45-49 years remains limited. Our study aimed to evaluate screening yield of FIT-based CRC screening between 45-49 and 50-54 years.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nConducted within a provincial CRC screening program in China, this study employed two-sample FIT screening followed by colonoscopy for positive results. Screening outcomes, including FIT positivity, colonoscopy completion, positive predictive values (PPVs) and detection rates of adenoma and advanced colorectal neoplasia, were compared between participants aged 45-49 and 50-54 years. Robust Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRRs), using 50-54-year-old group as reference.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong 733,137 participants, 89,446 were aged 45-49 years and 643,691 aged 50-54 years. Participants aged 45-49 years had higher FIT positivity (10.61%) and colonoscopy completion (46.75%) than those aged 50-54 years. However, detection rates for advanced neoplasia (0.30% vs. 0.39%; aRR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.88) and any adenoma (0.78% vs. 0.95%; aRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.90) were significantly lower in the younger group, with similar results observed for PPVs. Within the 45-49 year group, comparable detection rates to 50-54 year age group were observed among individuals with established risk factors, most notably among smokers (RR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.22-1.84), frequent alcohol drinkers (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01-1.75), and males (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.03-1.40).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOverall, adults aged 45-49 years showed higher screening participation but lower screening yield than those aged 50-54 years. These findings highlight the importance of prioritizing individuals with elevated risk profiles for CRC screening in younger populations.","PeriodicalId":520099,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000004087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The rising incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) has prompted debate over lowering screening initiation age. However, real-world evidence on fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening effectiveness in 45-49 years remains limited. Our study aimed to evaluate screening yield of FIT-based CRC screening between 45-49 and 50-54 years. METHODS Conducted within a provincial CRC screening program in China, this study employed two-sample FIT screening followed by colonoscopy for positive results. Screening outcomes, including FIT positivity, colonoscopy completion, positive predictive values (PPVs) and detection rates of adenoma and advanced colorectal neoplasia, were compared between participants aged 45-49 and 50-54 years. Robust Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRRs), using 50-54-year-old group as reference. RESULTS Among 733,137 participants, 89,446 were aged 45-49 years and 643,691 aged 50-54 years. Participants aged 45-49 years had higher FIT positivity (10.61%) and colonoscopy completion (46.75%) than those aged 50-54 years. However, detection rates for advanced neoplasia (0.30% vs. 0.39%; aRR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.88) and any adenoma (0.78% vs. 0.95%; aRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.90) were significantly lower in the younger group, with similar results observed for PPVs. Within the 45-49 year group, comparable detection rates to 50-54 year age group were observed among individuals with established risk factors, most notably among smokers (RR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.22-1.84), frequent alcohol drinkers (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01-1.75), and males (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.03-1.40). CONCLUSIONS Overall, adults aged 45-49 years showed higher screening participation but lower screening yield than those aged 50-54 years. These findings highlight the importance of prioritizing individuals with elevated risk profiles for CRC screening in younger populations.
45-49岁与50-54岁成人粪便免疫化学试验筛查结直肠癌的效果比较
背景:早发性结直肠癌(CRC)发病率的上升引发了降低筛查起始年龄的争论。然而,基于粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)的45-49岁筛查有效性的真实证据仍然有限。我们的研究旨在评估45-49岁和50-54岁之间基于fit的CRC筛查的筛查率。方法:本研究在中国的一个省级CRC筛查项目中进行,采用两样本FIT筛查,然后进行结肠镜检查以获得阳性结果。筛选结果,包括FIT阳性,结肠镜检查完成,阳性预测值(ppv)和腺瘤和晚期结直肠肿瘤的检出率,在45-49岁和50-54岁的参与者之间进行比较。采用稳健泊松回归估计校正风险比(aRRs),以50-54岁年龄组为参照。结果在733,137名参与者中,89,446名年龄在45-49岁之间,643,691名年龄在50-54岁之间。45-49岁的参与者FIT阳性(10.61%)和结肠镜检查完成率(46.75%)高于50-54岁的参与者。然而,晚期肿瘤(0.30% vs. 0.39%; aRR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.88)和任何腺瘤(0.78% vs. 0.95%; aRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.90)的检出率在年轻组中明显较低,ppv的结果相似。在45-49岁年龄组中,在具有确定危险因素的个体中观察到与50-54岁年龄组相当的检出率,最明显的是吸烟者(RR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.22-1.84)、经常饮酒者(RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01-1.75)和男性(RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.03-1.40)。结论总体而言,45-49岁成人的筛查参与率高于50-54岁成人,但筛查率较低。这些发现强调了在年轻人群中优先考虑高危人群进行结直肠癌筛查的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书