A randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness of audio-visual aid and ai-personalised video self-modelling interventions to reduce dental fear and anxiety in paediatric patients.
A Tasgaonkar, N Rathi, M Tasgaonkar, P Agrawal, A Tapkir, V Mehta
{"title":"A randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness of audio-visual aid and ai-personalised video self-modelling interventions to reduce dental fear and anxiety in paediatric patients.","authors":"A Tasgaonkar, N Rathi, M Tasgaonkar, P Agrawal, A Tapkir, V Mehta","doi":"10.1007/s40368-026-01241-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Paediatric dental anxiety remains a significant challenge in clinical practice, often impacting co-operation and treatment outcomes. This randomised controlled trial compares the anxiety-reducing effects of AI-based self-modelling versus standard video modelling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-blind, parallel-arm randomised controlled trial was conducted on 80 children aged 6-12 years requiring restorative dental treatment. Participants were randomised into two groups. Dental fear and anxiety were assessed using CFSS-DS and MCDASf, along with pulse and heart rate monitoring. Data were collected pre- and post-intervention by a blinded assessor and statistically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant within-group reductions in dental fear and anxiety (p < 0.001); however, no statistically significant between-group difference was observed for the primary outcome (CFSS-DS). The AI-based personalised video self-modelling app group demonstrated a greater reduction in heart rate (7.65 vs. 2.18 bpm), with a significant between-group difference (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.89), indicating reduced short-term physiological arousal rather than overall superiority of the intervention and specific anxiety parameters, particularly related to injections and dental examinations. Intergroup analysis revealed a large effect size for heart rate (Cohen's d = 0.89) and moderate-to-large effects for selected anxiety items with some item-level differences observed. However, overall CFSS-DS score differences between groups were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both interventions were effective in reducing dental fear and anxiety. However, no superiority was demonstrated for the primary psychological outcome. The AI-based personalised intervention showed greater reduction in physiological arousal (heart rate), suggesting potential benefits in short-term anxiety modulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520615,"journal":{"name":"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"1561-1571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-026-01241-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Paediatric dental anxiety remains a significant challenge in clinical practice, often impacting co-operation and treatment outcomes. This randomised controlled trial compares the anxiety-reducing effects of AI-based self-modelling versus standard video modelling.
Methods: A single-blind, parallel-arm randomised controlled trial was conducted on 80 children aged 6-12 years requiring restorative dental treatment. Participants were randomised into two groups. Dental fear and anxiety were assessed using CFSS-DS and MCDASf, along with pulse and heart rate monitoring. Data were collected pre- and post-intervention by a blinded assessor and statistically analysed.
Results: Both groups showed significant within-group reductions in dental fear and anxiety (p < 0.001); however, no statistically significant between-group difference was observed for the primary outcome (CFSS-DS). The AI-based personalised video self-modelling app group demonstrated a greater reduction in heart rate (7.65 vs. 2.18 bpm), with a significant between-group difference (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.89), indicating reduced short-term physiological arousal rather than overall superiority of the intervention and specific anxiety parameters, particularly related to injections and dental examinations. Intergroup analysis revealed a large effect size for heart rate (Cohen's d = 0.89) and moderate-to-large effects for selected anxiety items with some item-level differences observed. However, overall CFSS-DS score differences between groups were not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Both interventions were effective in reducing dental fear and anxiety. However, no superiority was demonstrated for the primary psychological outcome. The AI-based personalised intervention showed greater reduction in physiological arousal (heart rate), suggesting potential benefits in short-term anxiety modulation.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
