Quantitative microbial risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis of Legionella contamination in the water system of a large hospital in Southern Italy

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Valentina Spagnuolo, Paolo Trerotoli, Giusy Diella, Fabrizio Fasano, Letizia Lorusso, Antonella Francesca Savino, Francesco Triggiano, Maria Teresa Montagna, Osvalda De Giglio
{"title":"Quantitative microbial risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis of Legionella contamination in the water system of a large hospital in Southern Italy","authors":"Valentina Spagnuolo,&nbsp;Paolo Trerotoli,&nbsp;Giusy Diella,&nbsp;Fabrizio Fasano,&nbsp;Letizia Lorusso,&nbsp;Antonella Francesca Savino,&nbsp;Francesco Triggiano,&nbsp;Maria Teresa Montagna,&nbsp;Osvalda De Giglio","doi":"10.1016/j.ijheh.2026.114852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water used in healthcare facilities for human consumption can pose a health risk to patients, healthcare workers, and visitors. Directive (EU) 2020/2184, transposed in Italy by Legislative Decree 18/23 promotes a preventive, risk-based approach along the entire water supply chain through the Water Safety Plans (WSPs). Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA), combined with Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA), allows integrated evaluation of health impacts and economic sustainability of control strategies.This study aimed to develop a decision support method to define a hospital water network surveillance strategy in the Apulia region (Italy) by estimating the risk of <em>Legionella</em> infection and the related costs and benefits under different exposure scenarios. All wards were included, comparing two surveillance strategies: total surveillance (SA) of all water endpoints, and reduced surveillance (SRED), with a limited number of sampling points. Using a Bayesian framework and a dose-response model, the probability of infection and the expected number of Legionnaires’ disease cases were estimated for wards with different risk levels. In parallel, CBA evaluated direct costs, including microbiological analyses, point of use filters, and hospitalization days, economic indicators such as Net Benefit (NB), Willingness to Pay (WP), Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER), and Expected Incremental Benefit (EIB). Results showed lower infection probabilities with SA (2.6×10<sup>−5</sup>–2.95 × 10<sup>−7</sup>) compared to SRED (3.2×10<sup>−5</sup>–3.1 × 10<sup>−6</sup>), with expected cases of 0.4 vs 1.7. However, SRED was more cost-effective (€276,700 vs €422,900), showing positive NB (€149,959) and EIB (€ 348,787) and negative ICER (−9621.7). Even assuming a WTP of €25,000 per prevented case, surveillance costs exceeded benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13994,"journal":{"name":"International journal of hygiene and environmental health","volume":"276 ","pages":"Article 114852"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of hygiene and environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438463926001124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water used in healthcare facilities for human consumption can pose a health risk to patients, healthcare workers, and visitors. Directive (EU) 2020/2184, transposed in Italy by Legislative Decree 18/23 promotes a preventive, risk-based approach along the entire water supply chain through the Water Safety Plans (WSPs). Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA), combined with Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA), allows integrated evaluation of health impacts and economic sustainability of control strategies.This study aimed to develop a decision support method to define a hospital water network surveillance strategy in the Apulia region (Italy) by estimating the risk of Legionella infection and the related costs and benefits under different exposure scenarios. All wards were included, comparing two surveillance strategies: total surveillance (SA) of all water endpoints, and reduced surveillance (SRED), with a limited number of sampling points. Using a Bayesian framework and a dose-response model, the probability of infection and the expected number of Legionnaires’ disease cases were estimated for wards with different risk levels. In parallel, CBA evaluated direct costs, including microbiological analyses, point of use filters, and hospitalization days, economic indicators such as Net Benefit (NB), Willingness to Pay (WP), Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER), and Expected Incremental Benefit (EIB). Results showed lower infection probabilities with SA (2.6×10−5–2.95 × 10−7) compared to SRED (3.2×10−5–3.1 × 10−6), with expected cases of 0.4 vs 1.7. However, SRED was more cost-effective (€276,700 vs €422,900), showing positive NB (€149,959) and EIB (€ 348,787) and negative ICER (−9621.7). Even assuming a WTP of €25,000 per prevented case, surveillance costs exceeded benefits.
意大利南部一家大型医院供水系统军团菌污染的定量微生物风险评估及成本效益分析。
卫生保健设施中供人类使用的水可能对患者、卫生保健工作者和访客构成健康风险。第(EU) 2020/2184号指令通过第18/23号法令在意大利进行了修订,通过水安全计划(WSPs),在整个水供应链中推广了一种基于风险的预防性方法。定量微生物风险评估(QMRA)与成本效益分析(CBA)相结合,可对控制战略的健康影响和经济可持续性进行综合评价。本研究旨在通过评估军团菌感染风险以及不同暴露情景下的相关成本和收益,开发一种决策支持方法,以确定意大利普利亚地区医院供水网络监测策略。包括所有病房,比较两种监测策略:所有水端点的总监测(SA)和取样点数量有限的减少监测(SRED)。使用贝叶斯框架和剂量反应模型,对不同风险水平病房的感染概率和军团病病例的预期数量进行了估计。与此同时,CBA还评估了直接成本,包括微生物分析、使用点过滤器和住院天数,以及净效益(NB)、支付意愿(WP)、增量成本效益比(ICER)和预期增量效益(EIB)等经济指标。结果显示,SA感染概率(2.6×10-5-2.95 × 10-7)低于SRED (3.2×10-5-3.1 × 10-6),预期病例数为0.4 vs 1.7。然而,SRED更具成本效益(276,700欧元对422,900欧元),NB(149,959欧元)和EIB(348,787欧元)呈阳性,ICER(-9621.7欧元)呈阴性。即使假设每个预防病例的WTP为2.5万欧元,监测成本也超过了收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health serves as a multidisciplinary forum for original reports on exposure assessment and the reactions to and consequences of human exposure to the biological, chemical, and physical environment. Research reports, short communications, reviews, scientific comments, technical notes, and editorials will be peer-reviewed before acceptance for publication. Priority will be given to articles on epidemiological aspects of environmental toxicology, health risk assessments, susceptible (sub) populations, sanitation and clean water, human biomonitoring, environmental medicine, and public health aspects of exposure-related outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书