[Distributive justice in healthcare during times of change: a medical ethics perspective].

IF 0.6
Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-23 DOI:10.1007/s00108-026-02143-z
Urban Wiesing
{"title":"[Distributive justice in healthcare during times of change: a medical ethics perspective].","authors":"Urban Wiesing","doi":"10.1007/s00108-026-02143-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines existing funding structures and options for cost savings in the healthcare sector from the perspective of fairness. Funding via wage-related contributions with an income ceiling is criticised since other forms of income are not taken into account and the wealthy are relatively spared. The separation of statutory and private health insurance creates inequalities. Three options for savings are examined: avoiding unnecessary measures, increasing the efficiency of effective services, and prioritisation based on need, benefit, and cost. The advantages of the first two options over prioritisation are outlined, as are the respective responsibilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73385,"journal":{"name":"Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"978-984"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-026-02143-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines existing funding structures and options for cost savings in the healthcare sector from the perspective of fairness. Funding via wage-related contributions with an income ceiling is criticised since other forms of income are not taken into account and the wealthy are relatively spared. The separation of statutory and private health insurance creates inequalities. Three options for savings are examined: avoiding unnecessary measures, increasing the efficiency of effective services, and prioritisation based on need, benefit, and cost. The advantages of the first two options over prioritisation are outlined, as are the respective responsibilities.

[变革时期医疗保健的分配正义:医学伦理学的视角]。
本文从公平的角度考察了医疗保健部门现有的资金结构和成本节约方案。通过与工资相关的、有收入上限的捐款提供资金受到了批评,因为其他形式的收入没有被考虑在内,富人相对没有受到影响。法定医疗保险和私人医疗保险的分离造成了不平等。研究了节约的三种选择:避免不必要的措施,提高有效服务的效率,以及根据需要、效益和成本确定优先次序。本文概述了前两种选择相对于优先排序的优势,以及各自的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书