What matters beyond model choice for wearable sleep staging? How personalization, evaluation choices, and easy-to-classify wake impact performance.

Eric Canton, Franco Tavella, Christopher Drake, Olivia Walch, Philip Cheng
{"title":"What matters beyond model choice for wearable sleep staging? How personalization, evaluation choices, and easy-to-classify wake impact performance.","authors":"Eric Canton, Franco Tavella, Christopher Drake, Olivia Walch, Philip Cheng","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpag051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Methods to improve sleep classification of wearable data often emphasize model choice. However, without widely used benchmark datasets, it is difficult to determine factors driving performance gains (model architecture, dataset selection, or evaluation decisions). This study examines how dataset characteristics influence sleep classification performance beyond model choice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected SleepAccel-Clinical, a dataset of Apple Watch acceleration and polysomnography from 28 individuals with sleep apnea. Neural network models were trained on this dataset alongside SleepAccel (31 healthy individuals) and DREAMT (100 individuals with suspected sleep disorders) to evaluate how training and testing set choices impact performance. All models were compared against an Easy To Classify (ETC) wake model, which estimates wake probability by smoothing and scaling activity in a brief time window. The ETC model's average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) on each dataset was used to quantify intrinsic ease of classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ETC model accounted for substantial amount of the models' performance across the architectures, datasets, and training conditions, with significant correlations (<i>p≪</i> .01) between ETC performance and all other scenarios. Including individuals with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the training data improved performance when testing on datasets in which sleep disorders were suspected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sleep classification performance depends heavily on training and testing dataset characteristics, not solely on model choice. The presence of ETC wake epochs can markedly inflate performance metrics. Researchers should benchmark models on widely available datasets and quantify intrinsic class separability when introducing new datasets. <i>This article is part of the Consumer Sleep Technology Special Collection</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":74808,"journal":{"name":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","volume":"7 2","pages":"zpag051"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13283449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpag051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: Methods to improve sleep classification of wearable data often emphasize model choice. However, without widely used benchmark datasets, it is difficult to determine factors driving performance gains (model architecture, dataset selection, or evaluation decisions). This study examines how dataset characteristics influence sleep classification performance beyond model choice.

Methods: We collected SleepAccel-Clinical, a dataset of Apple Watch acceleration and polysomnography from 28 individuals with sleep apnea. Neural network models were trained on this dataset alongside SleepAccel (31 healthy individuals) and DREAMT (100 individuals with suspected sleep disorders) to evaluate how training and testing set choices impact performance. All models were compared against an Easy To Classify (ETC) wake model, which estimates wake probability by smoothing and scaling activity in a brief time window. The ETC model's average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) on each dataset was used to quantify intrinsic ease of classification.

Results: The ETC model accounted for substantial amount of the models' performance across the architectures, datasets, and training conditions, with significant correlations (p≪ .01) between ETC performance and all other scenarios. Including individuals with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the training data improved performance when testing on datasets in which sleep disorders were suspected.

Conclusions: Sleep classification performance depends heavily on training and testing dataset characteristics, not solely on model choice. The presence of ETC wake epochs can markedly inflate performance metrics. Researchers should benchmark models on widely available datasets and quantify intrinsic class separability when introducing new datasets. This article is part of the Consumer Sleep Technology Special Collection.

除了可穿戴式睡眠分期的模型选择之外,还有什么更重要?如何个性化,评估选择,并易于分类尾流影响性能。
研究目的:改进可穿戴数据睡眠分类的方法往往强调模型的选择。然而,如果没有广泛使用的基准数据集,就很难确定驱动性能提升的因素(模型架构、数据集选择或评估决策)。本研究探讨了数据集特征如何影响模型选择之外的睡眠分类性能。方法:我们收集了来自28名睡眠呼吸暂停患者的Apple Watch加速和多导睡眠图数据集SleepAccel-Clinical。神经网络模型与SleepAccel(31名健康个体)和DREAMT(100名疑似睡眠障碍个体)一起在该数据集上进行训练,以评估训练和测试集选择如何影响表现。所有模型都与易分类(ETC)尾流模型进行了比较,该模型通过在短时间窗口内平滑和缩放活动来估计尾流概率。使用ETC模型在每个数据集上的接受者工作特征曲线下的平均面积(AUROC)来量化分类的内在容易程度。结果:ETC模型在各种体系结构、数据集和训练条件下的性能中占了很大一部分,ETC性能与所有其他情况之间存在显著相关性(p≪0.01)。在训练数据中包括阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者,在对怀疑存在睡眠障碍的数据集进行测试时,可以提高性能。结论:睡眠分类性能在很大程度上取决于训练和测试数据集的特征,而不仅仅取决于模型选择。ETC尾流时代的存在可以显著提高性能指标。研究人员应该在广泛可用的数据集上对模型进行基准测试,并在引入新数据集时量化内在的类可分性。这篇文章是《消费者睡眠技术特别合集》的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书