[Keeping track of things: large language models for patient synopses : Source-bound system for clinical information systems].

IF 0.6
Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-23 DOI:10.1007/s00117-026-01632-4
Philipp Arnold, Johannes Jahn, Fabian Bamberg, Elmar Kotter
{"title":"[Keeping track of things: large language models for patient synopses : Source-bound system for clinical information systems].","authors":"Philipp Arnold, Johannes Jahn, Fabian Bamberg, Elmar Kotter","doi":"10.1007/s00117-026-01632-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing documentation burden in electronic health records makes it difficult to obtain a rapid overview of relevant prior information in complex disease courses. Especially in highly digitized settings such as radiology and interdisciplinary case conferences, large volumes of heterogeneous documents must be reviewed under time pressure.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to develop a large language model (LLM)-based patient synopsis to accelerate information retrieval while ensuring transparency, physician oversight, and data protection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>At the University Medical Center Freiburg, a system was developed for the automated integration of clinical documents from multiple primary systems, including the electronic health record (EHR), picture archiving and communication system (PACS), and other subsystems. It uses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), metadata harmonization, vector search, and agentic retrieval for the context-sensitive selection of relevant content. The system operates with role-based access control, end-to-end source attribution, and processing in a sovereign cloud without persistent data storage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The system enables patient-specific queries, structured longitudinal summaries, and automated, source-grounded summaries to support preparation for interdisciplinary case discussions. All statements remain traceable to primary documents, while medical interpretation and decision-making remain the responsibility of the treating physician. Interoperable information systems and a data protection framework in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the German Social Code Book V (SGB V), and the EU Artificial Intelligence Act are prerequisites for implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LLM-based patient synopses can support text-intensive clinical workflows, provided that controlled retrieval, clear source attribution, physician validation, and an interoperable, regulation-compliant system architecture are in place. Prospective evaluations are required before routine clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":74635,"journal":{"name":"Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"606-612"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-026-01632-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing documentation burden in electronic health records makes it difficult to obtain a rapid overview of relevant prior information in complex disease courses. Especially in highly digitized settings such as radiology and interdisciplinary case conferences, large volumes of heterogeneous documents must be reviewed under time pressure.

Objective: The aim was to develop a large language model (LLM)-based patient synopsis to accelerate information retrieval while ensuring transparency, physician oversight, and data protection.

Materials and methods: At the University Medical Center Freiburg, a system was developed for the automated integration of clinical documents from multiple primary systems, including the electronic health record (EHR), picture archiving and communication system (PACS), and other subsystems. It uses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), metadata harmonization, vector search, and agentic retrieval for the context-sensitive selection of relevant content. The system operates with role-based access control, end-to-end source attribution, and processing in a sovereign cloud without persistent data storage.

Results: The system enables patient-specific queries, structured longitudinal summaries, and automated, source-grounded summaries to support preparation for interdisciplinary case discussions. All statements remain traceable to primary documents, while medical interpretation and decision-making remain the responsibility of the treating physician. Interoperable information systems and a data protection framework in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the German Social Code Book V (SGB V), and the EU Artificial Intelligence Act are prerequisites for implementation.

Conclusion: LLM-based patient synopses can support text-intensive clinical workflows, provided that controlled retrieval, clear source attribution, physician validation, and an interoperable, regulation-compliant system architecture are in place. Prospective evaluations are required before routine clinical use.

[跟踪事物:用于患者概要的大型语言模型:用于临床信息系统的源绑定系统]。
背景:电子健康记录中日益增加的文件负担使得在复杂的疾病过程中获得相关先前信息的快速概述变得困难。特别是在高度数字化的环境中,如放射学和跨学科病例会议,必须在时间压力下审查大量异构文件。目的:目的是开发一个基于大语言模型(LLM)的患者摘要,以加速信息检索,同时确保透明度、医生监督和数据保护。材料和方法:在弗莱堡大学医学中心,开发了一个系统,用于自动集成来自多个主要系统的临床文件,包括电子健康记录(EHR)、图片存档和通信系统(PACS)和其他子系统。它使用检索增强生成(retrieve -augmented generation, RAG)、元数据协调、向量搜索和代理检索来对相关内容进行上下文敏感的选择。该系统使用基于角色的访问控制、端到端源归属以及在独立云中进行处理,而不需要持久的数据存储。结果:该系统支持患者特定查询、结构化纵向摘要和自动化、基于源的摘要,以支持跨学科病例讨论的准备工作。所有陈述均可追溯到原始文件,而医疗解释和决策仍由治疗医生负责。根据通用数据保护条例(GDPR)、德国社会法典第五册(SGB V)和欧盟人工智能法案,可互操作的信息系统和数据保护框架是实施的先决条件。结论:基于法学硕士的患者概要可以支持文本密集型临床工作流程,前提是受控检索、明确来源归属、医生验证以及可互操作、符合法规的系统架构到位。在常规临床使用前需要进行前瞻性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书