Anatomic Feasibility of 4-Legged Staples for Naviculocuneiform Arthrodesis.

IF 2.1
Steven R Cooperman, Lauren M Christie, Travis M Langan, Patrick E Bull, Mark A Prissel
{"title":"Anatomic Feasibility of 4-Legged Staples for Naviculocuneiform Arthrodesis.","authors":"Steven R Cooperman, Lauren M Christie, Travis M Langan, Patrick E Bull, Mark A Prissel","doi":"10.1177/19386400261456898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Naviculocuneiform (NC) arthrodesis is indicated for multiple pathologies, including degenerative and traumatic arthritis, progressive collapsing foot deformity, and medial column instability. Despite its broad application, no consensus exists regarding the optimal fixation construct. Shape-memory dynamic compression staples offer potential advantages in midfoot fusion compared to static fixation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of using 4-legged dynamic compression staples for NC arthrodesis and to characterize NC joint anatomy to guide implant selection and orientation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong><i>Level IV cadaveric study</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs (10 pairs) were dissected to expose the NC joint. Measurements of the medial and intermediate cuneiform and navicular facets were recorded. Four-legged staples (26 and 30 mm) were inserted, and adjacent joints were examined for proximal or distal penetrance. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U tests with significance set at P ≤ .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Staple fixation across the medial cuneiform-navicular articulation was safe in all 40 applications without talonavicular or tarsometatarsal breakthrough. In contrast, the intermediate segment demonstrated a significantly shorter length (35.83 ± 3.24 mm vs 46.40 ± 4.15 mm; P = .0002) and higher rates of talonavicular breakthrough at 20% for 26 mm staples and 60% for 30 mm staples. Longer intermediate segments correlated with reduced breakthrough (P = .0190).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify NC articulation lengths. Four-legged staples up to 30 mm in length were shown to be feasible for use in both dorsal-to-plantar or medial-to-lateral orientations at the medial cuneiform articulation. Due to breakthrough with the 4-legged staples, 2-legged staples (16-20 mm bridge) and staple legs ≤20 mm are advised for the intermediate segment to minimize iatrogenic injury risk.<b>Level of Evidence:</b> <i>Level IV Cadaveric Study</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"19386400261456898"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400261456898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Naviculocuneiform (NC) arthrodesis is indicated for multiple pathologies, including degenerative and traumatic arthritis, progressive collapsing foot deformity, and medial column instability. Despite its broad application, no consensus exists regarding the optimal fixation construct. Shape-memory dynamic compression staples offer potential advantages in midfoot fusion compared to static fixation.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of using 4-legged dynamic compression staples for NC arthrodesis and to characterize NC joint anatomy to guide implant selection and orientation.

Study design: Level IV cadaveric study.

Methods: Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs (10 pairs) were dissected to expose the NC joint. Measurements of the medial and intermediate cuneiform and navicular facets were recorded. Four-legged staples (26 and 30 mm) were inserted, and adjacent joints were examined for proximal or distal penetrance. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U tests with significance set at P ≤ .05.

Results: Staple fixation across the medial cuneiform-navicular articulation was safe in all 40 applications without talonavicular or tarsometatarsal breakthrough. In contrast, the intermediate segment demonstrated a significantly shorter length (35.83 ± 3.24 mm vs 46.40 ± 4.15 mm; P = .0002) and higher rates of talonavicular breakthrough at 20% for 26 mm staples and 60% for 30 mm staples. Longer intermediate segments correlated with reduced breakthrough (P = .0190).

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify NC articulation lengths. Four-legged staples up to 30 mm in length were shown to be feasible for use in both dorsal-to-plantar or medial-to-lateral orientations at the medial cuneiform articulation. Due to breakthrough with the 4-legged staples, 2-legged staples (16-20 mm bridge) and staple legs ≤20 mm are advised for the intermediate segment to minimize iatrogenic injury risk.Level of Evidence: Level IV Cadaveric Study.

四足钉用于船椎板关节融合术的解剖学可行性。
背景:船状脐(NC)关节融合术适用于多种疾病,包括退行性和外伤性关节炎,进行性塌陷足畸形和内侧柱不稳定。尽管其应用广泛,但对于最佳固定结构尚无共识。与静态固定相比,形状记忆动态压缩订书钉在中足融合中具有潜在的优势。目的:评估四足动态加压钉用于NC关节融合术的可行性,并对NC关节的解剖特征进行表征,以指导假体的选择和定位。研究设计:四级尸体研究。方法:解剖新鲜冷冻尸体下肢20例(10对),暴露NC关节。测量内侧和中间楔形骨和舟状骨。插入四足订钉(26和30毫米),检查邻近关节的近端或远端外穿性。采用Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计学分析,显著性P≤0.05。结果:在所有40例应用中,短钉固定穿过内侧舟状关节是安全的,没有突破距舟骨或跗跖骨。相比之下,中间节段的长度明显较短(35.83±3.24 mm vs 46.40±4.15 mm; P = 0.0002), 26 mm订书钉的距骨突破率为20%,30 mm订书钉的距骨突破率为60%。较长的中间段与较少的突破相关(P = 0.0190)。结论:据我们所知,这是第一个量化NC关节长度的研究。长达30毫米的四足钉被证明可用于内侧楔形关节的背到足底或内侧到外侧方向。由于4腿钉的突破,中间段建议使用2腿钉(16- 20mm桥)和≤20mm的钉腿,以减少医源性损伤的风险。证据等级:四级尸体研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书