When attention falters: Brain, breathing, and behavioral signals of lapses in interoceptive attention.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Isaac N Treves, Clare Shaffer, Alexandra L Decker, Nigel Jaffe, Anna O Tierney, Randy P Auerbach, Christian A Webb
{"title":"When attention falters: Brain, breathing, and behavioral signals of lapses in interoceptive attention.","authors":"Isaac N Treves, Clare Shaffer, Alexandra L Decker, Nigel Jaffe, Anna O Tierney, Randy P Auerbach, Christian A Webb","doi":"10.3758/s13415-026-01467-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mind‑body practices, such as meditation and yoga, involve paying attention to breathing sensations. During these practices, individuals report \"interoceptive lapses,\" moments when attention drifts away from internal bodily sensations. While lapses in attention to the external world have been widely studied, little is known about the physiological and neural mechanisms of interoceptive lapses. Interoceptive lapses may share markers with exteroceptive lapses-such as reaction time variability and default-mode network (DMN) connectivity-but may also depend on distinct brain systems and breathing physiology. We examined behavioral, physiological, and neural signals preceding lapses in a sample of 93 adolescents enriched for GAD and depression symptoms. Participants performed a 20-min breath counting task in the fMRI scanner with simultaneous breath recordings. Lapses were defined as moments when counting errors occurred. The sample was split into training and validation sets to test machine learning models predicting attentional lapses. The strongest predictors were timing and variability of button responses (AUCs > 0.75). Breathing variability and breathing-behavior synchronization showed smaller but generalizable predictive value (AUCs < 0.65). Whole-brain connectivity models also predicted lapses (AUC ≈ 0.65), incorporating the DMN, dorsal and ventral attention, and somatomotor networks. Furthermore, models that included brain connectivity marginally outperformed behavior-only models. Comparisons to previous exteroceptive findings indicate some common markers (e.g., reaction time variability) and some unique markers (e.g., selective perceptual coupling with attentional networks). Although limited by the clinical sample and lack of a control task, these results highlight brain-body markers of interoceptive attention that may inform real-time monitoring during mind-body interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-026-01467-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mind‑body practices, such as meditation and yoga, involve paying attention to breathing sensations. During these practices, individuals report "interoceptive lapses," moments when attention drifts away from internal bodily sensations. While lapses in attention to the external world have been widely studied, little is known about the physiological and neural mechanisms of interoceptive lapses. Interoceptive lapses may share markers with exteroceptive lapses-such as reaction time variability and default-mode network (DMN) connectivity-but may also depend on distinct brain systems and breathing physiology. We examined behavioral, physiological, and neural signals preceding lapses in a sample of 93 adolescents enriched for GAD and depression symptoms. Participants performed a 20-min breath counting task in the fMRI scanner with simultaneous breath recordings. Lapses were defined as moments when counting errors occurred. The sample was split into training and validation sets to test machine learning models predicting attentional lapses. The strongest predictors were timing and variability of button responses (AUCs > 0.75). Breathing variability and breathing-behavior synchronization showed smaller but generalizable predictive value (AUCs < 0.65). Whole-brain connectivity models also predicted lapses (AUC ≈ 0.65), incorporating the DMN, dorsal and ventral attention, and somatomotor networks. Furthermore, models that included brain connectivity marginally outperformed behavior-only models. Comparisons to previous exteroceptive findings indicate some common markers (e.g., reaction time variability) and some unique markers (e.g., selective perceptual coupling with attentional networks). Although limited by the clinical sample and lack of a control task, these results highlight brain-body markers of interoceptive attention that may inform real-time monitoring during mind-body interventions.

当注意力不集中时:大脑、呼吸和内感受性注意力缺失的行为信号。
身心练习,如冥想和瑜伽,涉及到注意呼吸的感觉。在这些练习中,个体报告“内感受缺失”,即注意力从身体内部感觉上转移的时刻。虽然对外部世界的注意力缺失已经被广泛研究,但对内感受性缺失的生理和神经机制知之甚少。内感受性失误可能与外感受性失误有共同的标志——比如反应时间的可变性和默认模式网络(DMN)的连接性——但也可能取决于不同的大脑系统和呼吸生理学。我们检查了93名患有广泛性焦虑症和抑郁症状的青少年的行为、生理和神经信号。参与者在fMRI扫描仪上进行了20分钟的呼吸计数任务,同时进行了呼吸记录。失误被定义为计数错误发生的时刻。样本被分为训练集和验证集,以测试预测注意力缺失的机器学习模型。最有力的预测因子是按钮反应的时间和可变性(auc为> 0.75)。呼吸变异性和呼吸行为同步表现出较小但可推广的预测价值(auc < 0.65)。全脑连通性模型也可以预测失误(AUC≈0.65),包括DMN、背侧和腹侧注意以及躯体运动网络。此外,包含大脑连接的模型略微优于仅包含行为的模型。与以往的外感受研究结果相比,我们发现了一些共同的标记(如反应时间变异性)和一些独特的标记(如选择性知觉与注意网络的耦合)。尽管受到临床样本和缺乏控制任务的限制,这些结果强调了内感受性注意的脑-体标记,可能为身心干预期间的实时监测提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书