Context-dependent motor-semantic interactions: evidence from dual-task paradigms in semantic fluency.

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Cosimo Tuena, Francesco Ianì, Daniele Di Lernia, Gian Nicolò Russo, Rosalia Meo, Giuseppe Riva, Claudia Repetto
{"title":"Context-dependent motor-semantic interactions: evidence from dual-task paradigms in semantic fluency.","authors":"Cosimo Tuena, Francesco Ianì, Daniele Di Lernia, Gian Nicolò Russo, Rosalia Meo, Giuseppe Riva, Claudia Repetto","doi":"10.1007/s00426-026-02323-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Embodied cognition theories propose that conceptual knowledge is grounded in sensorimotor experience, but evidence for motor involvement in semantic memory retrieval for natural items remains inconsistent. Across two pre-registered experiments, we investigated whether motor dual-tasks and body posture manipulations affect semantic recall for natural manipulable concepts (fruits) versus non-manipulable concepts (colors) during semantic fluency (SF) tasks. In Experiment 1, 46 young adults performed SF while executing concurrent motor sequences with either upper limbs or lower limbs as control. In Experiment 2, 46 young adults completed the same task while adopting either restricted or unrestricted control postures. Contrary to predictions of interference, Experiment 1 revealed facilitation: participants retrieved fruits significantly faster during upper limbs motor tasks compared to control dual-task, with no effects for the color category. This facilitation affected retrieval speed rather than semantic network structure, suggesting that semantically congruent movement might prime semantic recall, consistent with theories proposing that unbound motor feature activation facilitates conceptual access. Experiment 2 showed no significant posture effects on SF measures for either category. These findings support a weak embodiment perspective where motor systems influence semantic retrieval processes rather than core representations themselves. The context-dependent nature of the effects highlights that embodied influences on semantic memory are more flexible and task-sensitive than previously assumed. Motor involvement in semantic processing appears to depend critically on the specific relationship between concurrent motor activity and the conceptual domain being accessed, challenging assumptions about robust, context-independent embodied effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":48184,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","volume":"90 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-026-02323-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Embodied cognition theories propose that conceptual knowledge is grounded in sensorimotor experience, but evidence for motor involvement in semantic memory retrieval for natural items remains inconsistent. Across two pre-registered experiments, we investigated whether motor dual-tasks and body posture manipulations affect semantic recall for natural manipulable concepts (fruits) versus non-manipulable concepts (colors) during semantic fluency (SF) tasks. In Experiment 1, 46 young adults performed SF while executing concurrent motor sequences with either upper limbs or lower limbs as control. In Experiment 2, 46 young adults completed the same task while adopting either restricted or unrestricted control postures. Contrary to predictions of interference, Experiment 1 revealed facilitation: participants retrieved fruits significantly faster during upper limbs motor tasks compared to control dual-task, with no effects for the color category. This facilitation affected retrieval speed rather than semantic network structure, suggesting that semantically congruent movement might prime semantic recall, consistent with theories proposing that unbound motor feature activation facilitates conceptual access. Experiment 2 showed no significant posture effects on SF measures for either category. These findings support a weak embodiment perspective where motor systems influence semantic retrieval processes rather than core representations themselves. The context-dependent nature of the effects highlights that embodied influences on semantic memory are more flexible and task-sensitive than previously assumed. Motor involvement in semantic processing appears to depend critically on the specific relationship between concurrent motor activity and the conceptual domain being accessed, challenging assumptions about robust, context-independent embodied effects.

语境依赖的运动-语义相互作用:来自语义流畅性双任务范式的证据。
具身认知理论认为,概念知识是建立在感觉运动经验的基础上的,但运动参与自然项目的语义记忆检索的证据仍然不一致。在两个预注册实验中,我们研究了在语义流畅性(SF)任务中,运动双任务和身体姿势操作是否影响对自然可操作概念(水果)和非可操作概念(颜色)的语义回忆。在实验1中,46名年轻成人以上肢或下肢为对照,同时进行SF动作。在实验2中,46名年轻人在采取限制或不限制的控制姿势时完成了同样的任务。与干扰预测相反,实验1显示了促进作用:参与者在上肢运动任务中取回水果的速度明显快于对照双任务,对颜色类别没有影响。这种促进作用影响的是检索速度而不是语义网络结构,这表明语义一致的运动可能启动语义回忆,这与无约束运动特征激活促进概念访问的理论一致。实验2显示姿势对两类SF测量均无显著影响。这些发现支持弱体现的观点,即运动系统影响语义检索过程而不是核心表征本身。这些效应的上下文依赖性质强调了对语义记忆的具体影响比以前假设的更灵活和任务敏感。语义加工中的运动参与似乎主要依赖于并发运动活动与被访问的概念域之间的特定关系,这挑战了关于稳健的、与上下文无关的具身效应的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of human perception, attention, memory, and action. The Journal is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge based on firm experimental ground, but not to particular approaches or schools of thought. Theoretical and historical papers are welcome to the extent that they serve this general purpose; papers of an applied nature are acceptable if they contribute to basic understanding or serve to bridge the often felt gap between basic and applied research in the field covered by the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书