Acceptance and commitment therapy combined with behavioural strategies and self-compassion versus cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia: Feasibility, acceptability, and randomized pilot.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Mariana Miller-Mendes, Paula Castilho, Maria Inês Clara, Vanda Clemente, Ana Allen Gomes
{"title":"Acceptance and commitment therapy combined with behavioural strategies and self-compassion versus cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia: Feasibility, acceptability, and randomized pilot.","authors":"Mariana Miller-Mendes, Paula Castilho, Maria Inês Clara, Vanda Clemente, Ana Allen Gomes","doi":"10.1111/bjc.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary clinical benefits of ACTCOM-I, a novel intervention combining Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with behavioural strategies and self-compassion, compared with CBT-I.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analytic sample of 19 participants (63% women; M = 43.26 years, SD = 12.77) with chronic insomnia was randomized to ACTCOM-I (n = 10) or CBT-I (n = 9). Assessments occurred at baseline (T0), post-treatment (T1), 3-months (T2) and 6-months (T3) follow-ups. Measures included insomnia severity, beliefs, pre-sleep arousal, sleep effort, sleep diary, anxiety/depression, affect, quality of life, mindfulness, psychological flexibility, cognitive fusion, progress/obstructions to valued living, and self-compassion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Linear mixed models showed significant Time effects for insomnia severity (p < .001), with large within-group effect sizes maintained at follow-up. No significant between-group differences were found (p = .88), indicating similar improvement trajectories over time. Reliable change analysis (RCI) confirmed that 90% of ACTCOM-I and 89% of CBT-I participants achieved clinically significant improvements at post-treatment, with high response and remission rates. No participants deteriorated. Both interventions also led to comparable improvements in secondary sleep-related outcomes, anxiety/depression, and positive affect, while negative affect remained stable. Most process-related measures showed significant Time effects but no TimeXGroup interactions, further supporting similar patterns of change. Within-group analyses suggested greater improvements in psychological flexibility, cognitive fusion, obstructions to valued living and self-compassion in ACTCOM-I, particularly at follow-up. Despite high attrition, ACTCOM-I was feasible, well-accepted, and thematic analysis identified six overarching themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that ACTCOM-I is feasible, well-accepted, and preliminary findings support further studies on its potential as a complementary treatment to chronic insomnia.</p>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.70077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary clinical benefits of ACTCOM-I, a novel intervention combining Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with behavioural strategies and self-compassion, compared with CBT-I.

Methods: An analytic sample of 19 participants (63% women; M = 43.26 years, SD = 12.77) with chronic insomnia was randomized to ACTCOM-I (n = 10) or CBT-I (n = 9). Assessments occurred at baseline (T0), post-treatment (T1), 3-months (T2) and 6-months (T3) follow-ups. Measures included insomnia severity, beliefs, pre-sleep arousal, sleep effort, sleep diary, anxiety/depression, affect, quality of life, mindfulness, psychological flexibility, cognitive fusion, progress/obstructions to valued living, and self-compassion.

Results: Linear mixed models showed significant Time effects for insomnia severity (p < .001), with large within-group effect sizes maintained at follow-up. No significant between-group differences were found (p = .88), indicating similar improvement trajectories over time. Reliable change analysis (RCI) confirmed that 90% of ACTCOM-I and 89% of CBT-I participants achieved clinically significant improvements at post-treatment, with high response and remission rates. No participants deteriorated. Both interventions also led to comparable improvements in secondary sleep-related outcomes, anxiety/depression, and positive affect, while negative affect remained stable. Most process-related measures showed significant Time effects but no TimeXGroup interactions, further supporting similar patterns of change. Within-group analyses suggested greater improvements in psychological flexibility, cognitive fusion, obstructions to valued living and self-compassion in ACTCOM-I, particularly at follow-up. Despite high attrition, ACTCOM-I was feasible, well-accepted, and thematic analysis identified six overarching themes.

Conclusions: Results suggest that ACTCOM-I is feasible, well-accepted, and preliminary findings support further studies on its potential as a complementary treatment to chronic insomnia.

接受承诺疗法结合行为策略和自我同情与认知行为疗法治疗失眠:可行性、可接受性和随机试验。
目的:本随机对照试验(RCT)评估ACTCOM-I的可行性、可接受性和初步临床疗效,ACTCOM-I是一种将接受承诺疗法与行为策略和自我同情相结合的新型干预措施,与CBT-I进行比较。方法:分析19例慢性失眠症患者(63%为女性,M = 43.26岁,SD = 12.77),随机分为ACTCOM-I组(n = 10)和CBT-I组(n = 9)。在基线(T0)、治疗后(T1)、3个月(T2)和6个月(T3)随访时进行评估。测量包括失眠严重程度、信念、睡前觉醒、睡眠努力、睡眠日记、焦虑/抑郁、影响、生活质量、正念、心理灵活性、认知融合、有价值生活的进展/障碍以及自我同情。结果:线性混合模型显示失眠严重程度有显著的时间效应(p)。结论:结果表明actcom - 1是可行的,被广泛接受,初步发现支持进一步研究其作为慢性失眠补充治疗的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书