Correlation between Adalimumab concentration, anti-drug antibody and clinical efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Xile Wang, Tingting Wu, Xiaoxuan Xia, Qianxi Xing, Jingtian Shi, Shengqian Xu
{"title":"Correlation between Adalimumab concentration, anti-drug antibody and clinical efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.","authors":"Xile Wang, Tingting Wu, Xiaoxuan Xia, Qianxi Xing, Jingtian Shi, Shengqian Xu","doi":"10.1186/s42358-026-00560-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To detect anti-drug antibody (ADA), Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) and Adalimumab (ADL) concentration in Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and investigate correlations with clinical efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>78 active RA patients, 59 active AS patients and 30 age, sex matched healthy individuals were recruited. The treatment course was 24 weeks with assessments every 12 weeks. ADL concentration, ADA and NAb were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). SPSS 26.0 was applied for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ADA incidence in AS group was higher than that in RA group after 24 weeks of treatment. The ADL concentration in AS/RA group with ADA was lower than that without ADA after 12/24 weeks of treatment. At 24 weeks of treatment: In RA group, the Remission-Low activity group's ADL concentration was higher than that of the Moderate-Severe activity group, and the ADA positive rate was lower (χ²=4.481, P = 0.034). In AS group, the Remission-Low activity group's ADL concentration was higher than that of the High-Extreme high activity group, and the ADA positive rate was lower (χ²=5.184, P = 0.023). Logistic regression analysis showed that ADA at 12/24 weeks and disease course were risk factors for Moderate-Severe activity status in RA group and High-Extreme high activity status in AS group. In contrast, log₁₀(ADL concentration) at 24 weeks was a protective factor in RA, and log₁₀(ADL concentration) at 12 and 24 weeks were protective factors in AS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The total incidence of ADA, which is almost entirely NAb in RA and AS patients at 24 weeks after ADL treatment, is approximately 20%. AS patients show higher ADA incidence than RA patients. ADA correlates with lower ADL concentration and is closely related to disease activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48634,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13543341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-026-00560-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To detect anti-drug antibody (ADA), Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) and Adalimumab (ADL) concentration in Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and investigate correlations with clinical efficacy.

Methods: 78 active RA patients, 59 active AS patients and 30 age, sex matched healthy individuals were recruited. The treatment course was 24 weeks with assessments every 12 weeks. ADL concentration, ADA and NAb were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). SPSS 26.0 was applied for statistical analysis.

Results: The ADA incidence in AS group was higher than that in RA group after 24 weeks of treatment. The ADL concentration in AS/RA group with ADA was lower than that without ADA after 12/24 weeks of treatment. At 24 weeks of treatment: In RA group, the Remission-Low activity group's ADL concentration was higher than that of the Moderate-Severe activity group, and the ADA positive rate was lower (χ²=4.481, P = 0.034). In AS group, the Remission-Low activity group's ADL concentration was higher than that of the High-Extreme high activity group, and the ADA positive rate was lower (χ²=5.184, P = 0.023). Logistic regression analysis showed that ADA at 12/24 weeks and disease course were risk factors for Moderate-Severe activity status in RA group and High-Extreme high activity status in AS group. In contrast, log₁₀(ADL concentration) at 24 weeks was a protective factor in RA, and log₁₀(ADL concentration) at 12 and 24 weeks were protective factors in AS.

Conclusion: The total incidence of ADA, which is almost entirely NAb in RA and AS patients at 24 weeks after ADL treatment, is approximately 20%. AS patients show higher ADA incidence than RA patients. ADA correlates with lower ADL concentration and is closely related to disease activity.

阿达木单抗浓度、抗药抗体与类风湿关节炎、强直性脊柱炎临床疗效的相关性
目的:检测类风湿关节炎(RA)和强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者抗药物抗体(ADA)、中和抗体(NAb)和阿达木单抗(ADL)浓度,探讨其与临床疗效的相关性。方法:招募活动期RA患者78例,活动期AS患者59例,年龄、性别匹配的健康个体30例。疗程24周,每12周评估一次。采用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)测定ADL、ADA、NAb浓度。采用SPSS 26.0软件进行统计分析。结果:治疗24周后,AS组ADA发生率明显高于RA组。治疗12/24周后,AS/RA合并ADA组ADL浓度低于未合并ADA组。治疗24周时:RA组缓解-低活动组ADL浓度高于中重度活动组,ADA阳性率低于中重度活动组(χ 2 =4.481, P = 0.034)。AS组缓解-低活性组ADL浓度高于高-极高活性组,ADA阳性率低于高-极高活性组(χ 2 =5.184, P = 0.023)。Logistic回归分析显示,12/24周ADA和病程是RA组中重度活动状态和AS组高-极端高活动状态的危险因素。相比之下,24周的log₁₀(ADL浓度)是RA的保护因素,12周和24周的log₁₀(ADL浓度)是AS的保护因素。结论:ADL治疗后24周,RA和AS患者ADA的总发生率约为20%,几乎全部为NAb。AS患者ADA发生率高于RA患者。ADA与低ADL浓度相关,与疾病活动性密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Rheumatology
Advances in Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
41
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: Formerly named Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, the journal is celebrating its 60th year of publication. Advances in Rheumatology is an international, open access journal publishing pre-clinical, translational and clinical studies on all aspects of paediatric and adult rheumatic diseases, including degenerative, inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. The journal is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology and welcomes original research (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses), literature reviews, guidelines and letters arising from published material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书