Imagery rescripting for generalized anxiety disorder: A case series.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
L Stavropoulos, A B Phipps, I Sabel, D D J Cooper, N Briggs, J M Newby, J R Grisham
{"title":"Imagery rescripting for generalized anxiety disorder: A case series.","authors":"L Stavropoulos, A B Phipps, I Sabel, D D J Cooper, N Briggs, J M Newby, J R Grisham","doi":"10.1111/bjc.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This is the first clinical pilot to explore the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of imagery rescripting in individuals with a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with GAD (N = 18) attended assessment and 10 weekly sessions of imagery rescripting with a psychologist in person or via Telehealth. The protocol was based on Arntz's phased protocol and common rescripting procedures with adaptations to target the future orientation of worry. Measures of trait worry and GAD symptoms were administered pre-baseline (before a two-week baseline monitoring period), pre-, mid- and post-treatment, and at 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As hypothesized, linear mixed models revealed large change over time between baseline and post-treatment on all measures (PSWQ: d = -1.18; GAD-7: d = -1.04; PHQ-9: d = -.79), and no significant change in these measures between baseline and pre-treatment. Results were maintained at follow-up. Change in PSWQ and GAD-7 scores were clinically and reliably significant for over half the sample (59% and 53%, respectively). On a measure of credibility of the intervention completed after the first session, participants reported a mean score of 36.34 (SD = 6.38) out of 45. On a measure of patient satisfaction post-treatment, participants reported a mean score of 8.94 (SD = 1.35) out of 12, indicating high credibility and satisfaction. No adverse experiences were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot provides evidence that imagery rescripting is feasible and acceptable and improves symptoms of anxiety and worry in individuals with GAD. Future studies should evaluate the intervention in a randomized controlled trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.70073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This is the first clinical pilot to explore the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of imagery rescripting in individuals with a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).

Methods: Participants with GAD (N = 18) attended assessment and 10 weekly sessions of imagery rescripting with a psychologist in person or via Telehealth. The protocol was based on Arntz's phased protocol and common rescripting procedures with adaptations to target the future orientation of worry. Measures of trait worry and GAD symptoms were administered pre-baseline (before a two-week baseline monitoring period), pre-, mid- and post-treatment, and at 3-month follow-up.

Results: As hypothesized, linear mixed models revealed large change over time between baseline and post-treatment on all measures (PSWQ: d = -1.18; GAD-7: d = -1.04; PHQ-9: d = -.79), and no significant change in these measures between baseline and pre-treatment. Results were maintained at follow-up. Change in PSWQ and GAD-7 scores were clinically and reliably significant for over half the sample (59% and 53%, respectively). On a measure of credibility of the intervention completed after the first session, participants reported a mean score of 36.34 (SD = 6.38) out of 45. On a measure of patient satisfaction post-treatment, participants reported a mean score of 8.94 (SD = 1.35) out of 12, indicating high credibility and satisfaction. No adverse experiences were reported.

Conclusions: This pilot provides evidence that imagery rescripting is feasible and acceptable and improves symptoms of anxiety and worry in individuals with GAD. Future studies should evaluate the intervention in a randomized controlled trial.

广泛性焦虑障碍的意象处方:一个案例系列。
简介:这是第一个临床试验,旨在探讨图像处方在诊断为广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的个体中的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效。方法:患有广泛性焦虑症的参与者(N = 18)参加了评估和每周10次的意象重新描述会议,由心理学家亲自或通过远程医疗进行。该方案基于Arntz的分阶段方案和通用的处方程序,并针对未来的担忧方向进行了调整。在基线前(两周基线监测期之前)、治疗前、治疗中和治疗后以及3个月的随访中,对特质焦虑和广泛性焦虑症进行测量。结果:正如假设的那样,线性混合模型显示,基线和治疗后所有测量值(PSWQ: d = -1.18; GAD-7: d = -1.04; PHQ-9: d = - 0.79)随时间变化很大,基线和治疗前这些测量值没有显著变化。结果在随访中保持不变。超过一半的样本(分别为59%和53%)PSWQ和GAD-7评分的变化具有临床和可靠的显著性。在第一次会议后完成的干预可信度测量中,参与者报告的平均得分为36.34 (SD = 6.38)。在治疗后患者满意度的测量中,参与者报告的平均得分为8.94 (SD = 1.35),满分为12分,表明高可信度和满意度。没有不良经历的报告。结论:该试验提供了证据,表明图像处方是可行和可接受的,并改善了广泛性焦虑症患者的焦虑和担忧症状。未来的研究应在随机对照试验中评估干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书