Clinical scope and workforce contribution of advanced nurse practitioners in general practice: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.1 Q2 NURSING
Catriona Keye, Pamela McCann, Orla Loftus Moran, Melissa Hammond, Jane Deehan, Louise Nolan Ryan, Katy Lynch, Carol Kelly
{"title":"Clinical scope and workforce contribution of advanced nurse practitioners in general practice: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Catriona Keye, Pamela McCann, Orla Loftus Moran, Melissa Hammond, Jane Deehan, Louise Nolan Ryan, Katy Lynch, Carol Kelly","doi":"10.1177/17449871261452880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the clinical activity and workforce contribution of Advanced Nurse Practitioners (ANPs) working in general practice.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary care systems internationally are experiencing increasing demand due to ageing populations, rising multimorbidity and workforce shortages. Advanced nursing practice has expanded globally as a strategy to strengthen service capacity, improve access and maintain quality outcomes. Although there is substantial evidence regarding patient outcomes associated with advanced practice roles, there is comparatively limited empirical data describing the day-to-day clinical activity of ANPs in primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This national cross-sectional descriptive study, conducted in Ireland and reported in accordance with the STROBE Statement, involved a 1-week activity capture of General Practice Advanced Nurse Practitioners (GP ANPs) and candidate ANPs (cANPs) working across general practice settings. Data collected included consultation type, prescribing activity, complexity of care and clinical outcomes. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty GP ANPs/candidate ANPs recorded 1659 consultations, including 757 full episodes of care (45.6%). Practice spanned acute illness (adults and children), chronic disease management, women's health and preventive services. Medication optimisation activity included 503 medication reviews, 251 prescriptions issued and 59 medications deprescribed. About 15% of consultations were classified as complex and 14.8% involved multiple presenting complaints. Most consultations were independently managed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GP ANPs demonstrate broad clinical capability and contribute substantially to general practice capacity. The findings highlight the value of a holistic nursing approach, which is well suited to chronic disease management, health promotion, patient education and the management of multimorbidity, supporting access to care and strengthening primary care workforce capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"17449871261452880"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13283603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871261452880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To examine the clinical activity and workforce contribution of Advanced Nurse Practitioners (ANPs) working in general practice.

Background: Primary care systems internationally are experiencing increasing demand due to ageing populations, rising multimorbidity and workforce shortages. Advanced nursing practice has expanded globally as a strategy to strengthen service capacity, improve access and maintain quality outcomes. Although there is substantial evidence regarding patient outcomes associated with advanced practice roles, there is comparatively limited empirical data describing the day-to-day clinical activity of ANPs in primary care settings.

Methods: This national cross-sectional descriptive study, conducted in Ireland and reported in accordance with the STROBE Statement, involved a 1-week activity capture of General Practice Advanced Nurse Practitioners (GP ANPs) and candidate ANPs (cANPs) working across general practice settings. Data collected included consultation type, prescribing activity, complexity of care and clinical outcomes. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results: Twenty GP ANPs/candidate ANPs recorded 1659 consultations, including 757 full episodes of care (45.6%). Practice spanned acute illness (adults and children), chronic disease management, women's health and preventive services. Medication optimisation activity included 503 medication reviews, 251 prescriptions issued and 59 medications deprescribed. About 15% of consultations were classified as complex and 14.8% involved multiple presenting complaints. Most consultations were independently managed.

Conclusion: GP ANPs demonstrate broad clinical capability and contribute substantially to general practice capacity. The findings highlight the value of a holistic nursing approach, which is well suited to chronic disease management, health promotion, patient education and the management of multimorbidity, supporting access to care and strengthening primary care workforce capacity.

临床范围和劳动力贡献的高级护士从业人员在全科实践:横断面研究。
目的:探讨全科执业高级护士(ANPs)的临床活动和劳动力贡献。背景:由于人口老龄化、多病上升和劳动力短缺,国际上初级保健系统的需求正在增加。作为一项加强服务能力、改善获取途径和保持高质量结果的战略,先进护理实践已在全球范围内扩大。尽管有大量证据表明患者的预后与高级实践角色有关,但描述初级保健机构中ANPs的日常临床活动的经验数据相对有限。方法:这项全国性的横断面描述性研究,在爱尔兰进行,并根据STROBE声明进行报告,涉及在全科执业环境中工作的全科执业高级护士(GP ANPs)和候选ANPs (cANPs)为期一周的活动捕捉。收集的数据包括咨询类型、处方活动、护理复杂性和临床结果。数据分析采用描述性统计。结果:20名GP ANPs/候选ANPs记录了1659次咨询,包括757次完整的护理(45.6%)。实践涵盖急性病(成人和儿童)、慢性病管理、妇女保健和预防服务。药物优化活动包括503个药物评价,251个处方和59个药物处方。约15%的咨询被归类为复杂,14.8%涉及多次投诉。大多数咨询都是独立管理的。结论:全科医生ANPs表现出广泛的临床能力,并对全科医生的能力做出了重大贡献。研究结果强调了整体护理方法的价值,它非常适合于慢性病管理、健康促进、患者教育和多病管理,支持获得护理和加强初级保健工作人员的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书