Inconsistent Self-Reports of Lifetime Suicide Attempts During Residential Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Dual Diagnosis Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-22 DOI:10.1080/15504263.2026.2675226
Julia Thomas, Kevin Wenzel, Jennifer Carrano, Marc Fishman
{"title":"Inconsistent Self-Reports of Lifetime Suicide Attempts During Residential Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Julia Thomas, Kevin Wenzel, Jennifer Carrano, Marc Fishman","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2026.2675226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) are disproportionately at risk for suicide. Residential OUD treatment programs routinely assess suicide risk factors. However, the degree to which patients consistently self report lifetime suicide attempts (LSAs) on these measures is unknown. Using patient data from electronic health records, we examined the prevalence of self-reported LSAs, consistency of reporting on assessment measures within one treatment episode and across multiple episodes, and predictors of consistent reporting. <b>Methods:</b> Our sample consisted of all patient records for residential OUD treatment from 12/01/2020- 11/30/2021 with data on LSAs (<i>N</i> = 1,206). Three self-report assessments conducted by clinical staff during the treatment episodes measured LSAs. <b>Results:</b> LSAs were reported during 22% of residential treatment episodes on at least one measure. Within one treatment episode, 13% of individuals inconsistently self-reported LSAs across the different measures, and across multiple episodes, 23%. Those who were younger, female, identified as LGB, endorsed co-occurring anxiety or depressive symptoms and reported lifetime intravenous opioid use were more likely to inconsistently self report LSAs. <b>Conclusions:</b> These results suggest that single administration self-report instruments may be insufficient to adequately assess LSAs in patients with OUD. Care should be taken to assess suicide in this population that is already at increased risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"205-213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2026.2675226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) are disproportionately at risk for suicide. Residential OUD treatment programs routinely assess suicide risk factors. However, the degree to which patients consistently self report lifetime suicide attempts (LSAs) on these measures is unknown. Using patient data from electronic health records, we examined the prevalence of self-reported LSAs, consistency of reporting on assessment measures within one treatment episode and across multiple episodes, and predictors of consistent reporting. Methods: Our sample consisted of all patient records for residential OUD treatment from 12/01/2020- 11/30/2021 with data on LSAs (N = 1,206). Three self-report assessments conducted by clinical staff during the treatment episodes measured LSAs. Results: LSAs were reported during 22% of residential treatment episodes on at least one measure. Within one treatment episode, 13% of individuals inconsistently self-reported LSAs across the different measures, and across multiple episodes, 23%. Those who were younger, female, identified as LGB, endorsed co-occurring anxiety or depressive symptoms and reported lifetime intravenous opioid use were more likely to inconsistently self report LSAs. Conclusions: These results suggest that single administration self-report instruments may be insufficient to adequately assess LSAs in patients with OUD. Care should be taken to assess suicide in this population that is already at increased risk.

阿片类药物使用障碍住院治疗期间终生自杀企图不一致的自我报告。
目的:阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者的自杀风险不成比例。住宅OUD治疗项目常规评估自杀风险因素。然而,在这些测量中,患者持续自我报告终生自杀企图(LSAs)的程度是未知的。使用来自电子健康记录的患者数据,我们检查了自我报告的LSAs的流行程度,一次治疗发作和多次治疗发作中评估措施报告的一致性,以及一致报告的预测因素。方法:我们的样本包括2020年1月12日至2021年11月30日期间所有住院OUD治疗的患者记录,包括LSAs数据(N = 1,206)。临床工作人员在治疗期间进行的三次自我报告评估测量了LSAs。结果:在至少一项测量中,22%的住院治疗期间报告了lsa。在一次治疗中,13%的个体在不同的测量中自我报告的LSAs不一致,而在多次治疗中,这一比例为23%。那些年轻、女性、被确定为LGB、认可共发生焦虑或抑郁症状并报告终生静脉注射阿片类药物的人更有可能不一致地自我报告LSAs。结论:这些结果表明,单药自我报告工具可能不足以充分评估OUD患者的LSAs。应谨慎评估这一人群的自杀风险,因为他们的自杀风险已经在增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书