Julia Thomas, Kevin Wenzel, Jennifer Carrano, Marc Fishman
{"title":"Inconsistent Self-Reports of Lifetime Suicide Attempts During Residential Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Julia Thomas, Kevin Wenzel, Jennifer Carrano, Marc Fishman","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2026.2675226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) are disproportionately at risk for suicide. Residential OUD treatment programs routinely assess suicide risk factors. However, the degree to which patients consistently self report lifetime suicide attempts (LSAs) on these measures is unknown. Using patient data from electronic health records, we examined the prevalence of self-reported LSAs, consistency of reporting on assessment measures within one treatment episode and across multiple episodes, and predictors of consistent reporting. <b>Methods:</b> Our sample consisted of all patient records for residential OUD treatment from 12/01/2020- 11/30/2021 with data on LSAs (<i>N</i> = 1,206). Three self-report assessments conducted by clinical staff during the treatment episodes measured LSAs. <b>Results:</b> LSAs were reported during 22% of residential treatment episodes on at least one measure. Within one treatment episode, 13% of individuals inconsistently self-reported LSAs across the different measures, and across multiple episodes, 23%. Those who were younger, female, identified as LGB, endorsed co-occurring anxiety or depressive symptoms and reported lifetime intravenous opioid use were more likely to inconsistently self report LSAs. <b>Conclusions:</b> These results suggest that single administration self-report instruments may be insufficient to adequately assess LSAs in patients with OUD. Care should be taken to assess suicide in this population that is already at increased risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"205-213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2026.2675226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) are disproportionately at risk for suicide. Residential OUD treatment programs routinely assess suicide risk factors. However, the degree to which patients consistently self report lifetime suicide attempts (LSAs) on these measures is unknown. Using patient data from electronic health records, we examined the prevalence of self-reported LSAs, consistency of reporting on assessment measures within one treatment episode and across multiple episodes, and predictors of consistent reporting. Methods: Our sample consisted of all patient records for residential OUD treatment from 12/01/2020- 11/30/2021 with data on LSAs (N = 1,206). Three self-report assessments conducted by clinical staff during the treatment episodes measured LSAs. Results: LSAs were reported during 22% of residential treatment episodes on at least one measure. Within one treatment episode, 13% of individuals inconsistently self-reported LSAs across the different measures, and across multiple episodes, 23%. Those who were younger, female, identified as LGB, endorsed co-occurring anxiety or depressive symptoms and reported lifetime intravenous opioid use were more likely to inconsistently self report LSAs. Conclusions: These results suggest that single administration self-report instruments may be insufficient to adequately assess LSAs in patients with OUD. Care should be taken to assess suicide in this population that is already at increased risk.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.