Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Malay Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for Low Back Pain.

IF 2.8 Q1 REHABILITATION
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-23 DOI:10.5535/arm.250173
Nur Sakinah Mohd Yasin, Erna Faryza Mohd Poot, Husna Ahmad Ainuddin, Noor Aziella Mohd Nayan, Mohammed Alrashdi, Nizam Baharom, Ahmad Zamir Che Daud
{"title":"Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Malay Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for Low Back Pain.","authors":"Nur Sakinah Mohd Yasin, Erna Faryza Mohd Poot, Husna Ahmad Ainuddin, Noor Aziella Mohd Nayan, Mohammed Alrashdi, Nizam Baharom, Ahmad Zamir Che Daud","doi":"10.5535/arm.250173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) for Malay-speaking individuals with low back pain (LBP) in Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A methodological study was conducted following established international guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation. The process included forward-backward translation, expert review, content validation, face validation, and psychometric testing among individuals with LBP. Content and face validity indices were evaluated by rehabilitation professionals (n=8) and individuals with LBP (n=9). Psychometric testing was conducted with 102 participants to assess internal consistency, test-retest reliability (n=31), concurrent validity using the Malay Oswestry Disability Index, and known-groups validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All items demonstrated excellent content and face validity (I-CVI, I-FVI, S-CVI/Ave, and S-FVI/Ave=1.00). The Malay RMDQ showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.932) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.996). Concurrent validity with the Malay Oswestry Disability Index was moderate (r=0.742, p<0.001). A preliminary known-groups comparison showed a statistically significant difference in the Malay RMDQ scores between participants with LBP and those without LBP (p=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Malay RMDQ demonstrated preliminary psychometric support, including evidence of reliability, validity, and cultural appropriateness, for assessing disability in individuals with LBP. Future research should explore its responsiveness and utility in broader populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47738,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","volume":" ","pages":"188-195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13329519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.250173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) for Malay-speaking individuals with low back pain (LBP) in Malaysia.

Methods: A methodological study was conducted following established international guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation. The process included forward-backward translation, expert review, content validation, face validation, and psychometric testing among individuals with LBP. Content and face validity indices were evaluated by rehabilitation professionals (n=8) and individuals with LBP (n=9). Psychometric testing was conducted with 102 participants to assess internal consistency, test-retest reliability (n=31), concurrent validity using the Malay Oswestry Disability Index, and known-groups validity.

Results: All items demonstrated excellent content and face validity (I-CVI, I-FVI, S-CVI/Ave, and S-FVI/Ave=1.00). The Malay RMDQ showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.932) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.996). Concurrent validity with the Malay Oswestry Disability Index was moderate (r=0.742, p<0.001). A preliminary known-groups comparison showed a statistically significant difference in the Malay RMDQ scores between participants with LBP and those without LBP (p=0.03).

Conclusion: The Malay RMDQ demonstrated preliminary psychometric support, including evidence of reliability, validity, and cultural appropriateness, for assessing disability in individuals with LBP. Future research should explore its responsiveness and utility in broader populations.

马来语版罗兰-莫里斯下腰痛残疾问卷的翻译、跨文化适应与验证。
目的:翻译,文化适应,并验证罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)在马来西亚讲马来语的个体腰痛(LBP)。方法:根据跨文化适应和心理测量验证的国际准则进行方法学研究。研究过程包括前向后翻译、专家评审、内容验证、面部验证和LBP个体的心理测试。8名康复专业人员和9名LBP患者分别对内容效度和面部效度进行评价。对102名参与者进行了心理测试,以评估内部一致性,重测信度(n=31),使用马来Oswestry残疾指数的并发效度和已知组效度。结果:所有条目的内容和面效度都很好(I-CVI, I-FVI, S-CVI/Ave, S-FVI/Ave=1.00)。马来语RMDQ具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α=0.932)和良好的重测信度(ICC=0.996)。马来语Oswestry残疾指数的同时效度为中等(r=0.742, p)。结论:马来语RMDQ在评估LBP患者的残疾方面显示了初步的心理测量支持,包括信度、效度和文化适宜性的证据。未来的研究应探索其在更广泛人群中的响应性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书