Federal Borrowing Limits and Physician Associate/Assistant Education: A National Survey of Pre-Physician Associate/Assistant Students, Physician Associate/Assistant Students, and Practicing Physician Associates/Assistants.

Q2 Health Professions
Jennifer A Snyder, Stephen Lewia, Sean Kolhoff, Dominique Frias-Sarmiento, Tyler Smith
{"title":"Federal Borrowing Limits and Physician Associate/Assistant Education: A National Survey of Pre-Physician Associate/Assistant Students, Physician Associate/Assistant Students, and Practicing Physician Associates/Assistants.","authors":"Jennifer A Snyder, Stephen Lewia, Sean Kolhoff, Dominique Frias-Sarmiento, Tyler Smith","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The One Big Beautiful Bill Act eliminates the Grad PLUS program and establishes annual and aggregate federal student loan caps beginning July 1, 2026. Physician associate/assistant (PA) programs are currently classified as graduate-level for federal aid purposes, potentially subjecting PA students to lower borrowing limits than other health professions. This study examined perceptions of federal loan caps and anticipated impacts on PA education and workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, anonymous, web-based survey was administered in January 2026 to pre-PAs, PA students, and practicing PAs across the United States. Items assessed demographics, borrowing patterns, perceived affordability, and anticipated behavioral responses under a proposed $20,500 annual federal loan cap. Descriptive statistics, chi-square analyses, independent samples t -tests, and multivariate logistic regression were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4,000+ respondents, concern regarding restrictions was high; 72% of PA students and practicing PAs reported being very or extremely concerned. Overall, 90.8% anticipated decreased applicant volume and 89.6% predicted reduced diversity under a $20,500 annual cap. Logistic regression (N = 3,106) indicated that each additional economic disadvantage factor increased odds of reporting discouragement from pursuing PA education by 20% (odds ratio = 1.20; 95% confidence interval: 1.12-1.29). Underrepresented in medicine respondents were disproportionately represented in the highest educational cost and borrowing categories ( p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Respondents anticipate negative implications of federal borrowing caps for PA applicant volume, diversity, and service to underserved areas. Financial vulnerability appears central to perceived feasibility of PA education under proposed loan limits, raising equity and workforce sustainability concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The One Big Beautiful Bill Act eliminates the Grad PLUS program and establishes annual and aggregate federal student loan caps beginning July 1, 2026. Physician associate/assistant (PA) programs are currently classified as graduate-level for federal aid purposes, potentially subjecting PA students to lower borrowing limits than other health professions. This study examined perceptions of federal loan caps and anticipated impacts on PA education and workforce.

Methods: A cross-sectional, anonymous, web-based survey was administered in January 2026 to pre-PAs, PA students, and practicing PAs across the United States. Items assessed demographics, borrowing patterns, perceived affordability, and anticipated behavioral responses under a proposed $20,500 annual federal loan cap. Descriptive statistics, chi-square analyses, independent samples t -tests, and multivariate logistic regression were performed.

Results: Among 4,000+ respondents, concern regarding restrictions was high; 72% of PA students and practicing PAs reported being very or extremely concerned. Overall, 90.8% anticipated decreased applicant volume and 89.6% predicted reduced diversity under a $20,500 annual cap. Logistic regression (N = 3,106) indicated that each additional economic disadvantage factor increased odds of reporting discouragement from pursuing PA education by 20% (odds ratio = 1.20; 95% confidence interval: 1.12-1.29). Underrepresented in medicine respondents were disproportionately represented in the highest educational cost and borrowing categories ( p < 0.001).

Discussion: Respondents anticipate negative implications of federal borrowing caps for PA applicant volume, diversity, and service to underserved areas. Financial vulnerability appears central to perceived feasibility of PA education under proposed loan limits, raising equity and workforce sustainability concerns.

联邦借款限额和医师助理/助理教育:对预备医师助理/助理学生、医师助理/助理学生和执业医师助理/助理的全国调查。
简介:《一个大的美丽法案》取消了“毕业生PLUS”计划,并从2026年7月1日起建立了年度和总联邦学生贷款上限。医师助理/助理(PA)项目目前被归类为联邦资助目的的研究生水平,可能使PA学生比其他卫生专业的学生借款限额更低。本研究考察了对联邦贷款上限的看法以及对PA教育和劳动力的预期影响。方法:一项横断面、匿名、基于网络的调查于2016年1月对美国各地的助理教师预科、助理教师学生和执业助理教师进行了调查。项目评估了人口统计、借贷模式、感知负担能力以及在建议的20,500美元年度联邦贷款上限下的预期行为反应。进行了描述性统计、卡方分析、独立样本t检验和多变量逻辑回归。结果:在4000多名受访者中,对限制的关注度较高;72%的私人助理学生和执业私人助理表示非常或非常担心。总体而言,90.8%的人预计申请人数量会减少,89.6%的人预计在20,500美元的年度上限下会减少多样性。逻辑回归(N = 3,106)表明,每增加一个经济劣势因素,报告不愿接受研究生教育的几率就会增加20%(优势比= 1.20;95%置信区间:1.12-1.29)。在医学领域代表性不足的受访者中,教育成本最高和借贷类别的比例不成比例(p < 0.001)。讨论:受访者预计联邦借款上限对PA申请人数量、多样性和服务不足地区的服务产生负面影响。在拟议的贷款限额下,财务脆弱性似乎是PA教育可行性的核心,引起了对公平和劳动力可持续性的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书