Backward Incline Walking in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Feasibility Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Restorative neurology and neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-23 DOI:10.1177/09226028261451969
Sharareh Sharififar, Chris Lamprecht, Anna Yozefovich Khanna, Parisa Rashidi, Paula Ackerman, Parisa Zarreii, Cynthia Garvan, Hassan Azari, Chandramouli Krishnan
{"title":"Backward Incline Walking in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Feasibility Study.","authors":"Sharareh Sharififar, Chris Lamprecht, Anna Yozefovich Khanna, Parisa Rashidi, Paula Ackerman, Parisa Zarreii, Cynthia Garvan, Hassan Azari, Chandramouli Krishnan","doi":"10.1177/09226028261451969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionRestoring normal gait function remains a major clinical challenge in post-stroke rehabilitation. Backward walking may increase neuromotor demands compared with forward walking and performing it on an incline may further augment task complexity. However, the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of backward incline walking in individuals with chronic stroke have not been systematically examined.ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of a single-session treadmill-based backward incline walking protocol in individuals with chronic stroke, focusing on recruitment, adherence, safety, tolerability, and participant acceptability.MethodsDesignProspective, nonrandomized pilot feasibility study.SettingClinical Human Dynamic Laboratory at a university-affiliated rehabilitation program.ParticipantsSix individuals with chronic stroke (≥6 months post-event) were enrolled (median age 68 years, interquartile range [IQR] 56-73, median time since stroke of 19 months IQR [15-98]). Inclusion criteria included ambulatory ability with or without a single cane for ≥10-meter and absence of cognitive, orthopedic, or cardiopulmonary contraindications, and ability to tolerate 15 min of treadmill walking. All participants met these criteria and provided informed consent.InterventionParticipants completed three treadmill walking conditions delivered in a fixed order (level, forward incline, and backward incline walking), each for up to 15 min at self-selected speeds. Rest breaks and manual support were provided as needed.Main OutcomesFeasibility metrics included recruitment rate, protocol adherence, safety (adverse events), tolerability (rating of perceived exertion), and participant acceptability.Secondary Descriptive MeasuresOverground walking speed and spatiotemporal gait parameters recorded using an instrumented walkway before and after the treadmill conditions. These data were summarized descriptively without inferential statistical testing.ResultsRecruitment was feasible, with 40% of eligible individuals enrolled. All participants completed the single-session protocol without adverse events. Perceived exertion increased in our sample with task complexity and was highest during backward incline walking (median RPE = 6). Participant acceptability was high, with all individuals expressing willingness to repeat the protocol.SignificanceA single-session treadmill-based backward incline walking was feasible, safe, and well-tolerated in this pilot sample of ambulatory individuals with chronic stroke. These findings progression to adequately-powered, randomized studies designed to evaluate efficacy and to address order effects and individualized gait responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":21130,"journal":{"name":"Restorative neurology and neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"390-398"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative neurology and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09226028261451969","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionRestoring normal gait function remains a major clinical challenge in post-stroke rehabilitation. Backward walking may increase neuromotor demands compared with forward walking and performing it on an incline may further augment task complexity. However, the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of backward incline walking in individuals with chronic stroke have not been systematically examined.ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of a single-session treadmill-based backward incline walking protocol in individuals with chronic stroke, focusing on recruitment, adherence, safety, tolerability, and participant acceptability.MethodsDesignProspective, nonrandomized pilot feasibility study.SettingClinical Human Dynamic Laboratory at a university-affiliated rehabilitation program.ParticipantsSix individuals with chronic stroke (≥6 months post-event) were enrolled (median age 68 years, interquartile range [IQR] 56-73, median time since stroke of 19 months IQR [15-98]). Inclusion criteria included ambulatory ability with or without a single cane for ≥10-meter and absence of cognitive, orthopedic, or cardiopulmonary contraindications, and ability to tolerate 15 min of treadmill walking. All participants met these criteria and provided informed consent.InterventionParticipants completed three treadmill walking conditions delivered in a fixed order (level, forward incline, and backward incline walking), each for up to 15 min at self-selected speeds. Rest breaks and manual support were provided as needed.Main OutcomesFeasibility metrics included recruitment rate, protocol adherence, safety (adverse events), tolerability (rating of perceived exertion), and participant acceptability.Secondary Descriptive MeasuresOverground walking speed and spatiotemporal gait parameters recorded using an instrumented walkway before and after the treadmill conditions. These data were summarized descriptively without inferential statistical testing.ResultsRecruitment was feasible, with 40% of eligible individuals enrolled. All participants completed the single-session protocol without adverse events. Perceived exertion increased in our sample with task complexity and was highest during backward incline walking (median RPE = 6). Participant acceptability was high, with all individuals expressing willingness to repeat the protocol.SignificanceA single-session treadmill-based backward incline walking was feasible, safe, and well-tolerated in this pilot sample of ambulatory individuals with chronic stroke. These findings progression to adequately-powered, randomized studies designed to evaluate efficacy and to address order effects and individualized gait responses.

脑卒中康复后倾斜行走:一项试点可行性研究。
恢复正常的步态功能仍然是脑卒中后康复的主要临床挑战。与向前行走相比,向后行走可能会增加神经运动需求,而在斜坡上行走可能会进一步增加任务的复杂性。然而,对慢性脑卒中患者进行后倾斜行走的可行性、安全性和耐受性还没有系统的研究。目的评估基于跑步机的单次后倾步行方案在慢性脑卒中患者中的可行性,重点关注招募、依从性、安全性、耐受性和参与者可接受性。方法设计前瞻性、非随机的试点可行性研究。一所大学附属康复项目的临床人体动态实验室。6例慢性卒中患者(≥6个月)被纳入研究(中位年龄68岁,四分位数范围[IQR] 56-73,中位卒中发生时间[15-98]为19个月)。纳入标准包括使用或不使用单手杖行走≥10米,无认知、骨科或心肺禁忌症,能够忍受15分钟的跑步机行走。所有参与者都符合这些标准并提供知情同意。干预:参与者按照固定的顺序完成三种跑步机行走条件(水平、前倾和后倾行走),每一种以自己选择的速度行走15分钟。根据需要提供休息时间和体力支持。可行性指标包括招募率、方案依从性、安全性(不良事件)、耐受性(感觉劳累程度)和参与者可接受性。次要描述性测量在跑步机条件之前和之后,使用仪器人行道记录地面行走速度和时空步态参数。这些数据是描述性总结,没有推论统计检验。结果招募是可行的,有40%的符合条件的人入组。所有参与者均完成了单次治疗方案,无不良事件发生。在我们的样本中,随着任务复杂性的增加,感知劳累增加,在向后倾斜行走时最高(中位RPE = 6)。参与者的可接受性很高,所有个体都表示愿意重复该方案。在慢性脑卒中患者中,基于跑步机的单次后倾行走是可行、安全且耐受性良好的。这些发现进展为足够有力的随机研究,旨在评估疗效,解决顺序效应和个体化步态反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal publishes papers relating to the plasticity and response of the nervous system to accidental or experimental injuries and their interventions, transplantation, neurodegenerative disorders and experimental strategies to improve regeneration or functional recovery and rehabilitation. Experimental and clinical research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant experimental or clinical relevance and interest to a multidisciplinary audience. Experiments on un-anesthetized animals should conform with the standards for the use of laboratory animals as established by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, US National Academy of Sciences. Experiments in which paralytic agents are used must be justified. Patient identity should be concealed. All manuscripts are sent out for blind peer review to editorial board members or outside reviewers. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience is a member of Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书