The influence of passive prosthetic knee joints on uneven compliant surface walking among transfemoral amputees under dual-task versus single-task conditions.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Nur Amira Adlan, Nooranida Arifin, Noor Azuan Abu Osman, Hanie Nadia Shasmin, Saari Mohamad Yatim
{"title":"The influence of passive prosthetic knee joints on uneven compliant surface walking among transfemoral amputees under dual-task versus single-task conditions.","authors":"Nur Amira Adlan, Nooranida Arifin, Noor Azuan Abu Osman, Hanie Nadia Shasmin, Saari Mohamad Yatim","doi":"10.1177/09544119261458863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with transfemoral amputation (TFA) often experience gait adaptations when walking under environmental and cognitive challenges. This study examined the influence of passive prosthetic knee mechanisms on self-reported mobility and gait biomechanics during single-task and dual-task walking over an uneven compliant surface. Participants were grouped as able-bodied individuals (AB; <i>n</i> = 15), individuals with TFA using polycentric knees (TFA<sub>P</sub>; <i>n</i> = 6), and individuals with TFA using fluid-controlled knees (TFA<sub>FC</sub>; pneumatic/hydraulic; <i>n</i> = 5). The dual-task condition involved walking while performing an auditory Stroop task. Outcome measures included self-report questionnaires, joint kinematics, joint kinetics, and ground reaction forces. Biomechanical variables were analysed using linear mixed-effects models to examine group, task, and group × task interaction effects. Self-reported outcomes indicated reduced functional mobility in individuals with TFA compared with AB. Biomechanical findings showed altered gait patterns in both TFA groups compared with AB, particularly reduced knee flexion and ankle plantarflexion. For kinetic outcomes, significant group effects were observed for selected joint moment and power variables, although Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise differences were identified only for maximum stance hip extension moment (HM1), with lower values in TFA<sub>FC</sub> compared with AB. A significant task effect was observed for maximum stance ankle dorsiflexion (AA2) during dual-task walking across all groups. A significant group × task interaction was found for maximum hip eccentric power during late stance (HP2), with increased hip power during dual-task walking in TFA<sub>P</sub>. Overall, passive prosthetic knee mechanisms showed limited differences, although task-specific adaptations were evident under combined uneven surface and cognitive demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":20666,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"712-721"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13338487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119261458863","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals with transfemoral amputation (TFA) often experience gait adaptations when walking under environmental and cognitive challenges. This study examined the influence of passive prosthetic knee mechanisms on self-reported mobility and gait biomechanics during single-task and dual-task walking over an uneven compliant surface. Participants were grouped as able-bodied individuals (AB; n = 15), individuals with TFA using polycentric knees (TFAP; n = 6), and individuals with TFA using fluid-controlled knees (TFAFC; pneumatic/hydraulic; n = 5). The dual-task condition involved walking while performing an auditory Stroop task. Outcome measures included self-report questionnaires, joint kinematics, joint kinetics, and ground reaction forces. Biomechanical variables were analysed using linear mixed-effects models to examine group, task, and group × task interaction effects. Self-reported outcomes indicated reduced functional mobility in individuals with TFA compared with AB. Biomechanical findings showed altered gait patterns in both TFA groups compared with AB, particularly reduced knee flexion and ankle plantarflexion. For kinetic outcomes, significant group effects were observed for selected joint moment and power variables, although Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise differences were identified only for maximum stance hip extension moment (HM1), with lower values in TFAFC compared with AB. A significant task effect was observed for maximum stance ankle dorsiflexion (AA2) during dual-task walking across all groups. A significant group × task interaction was found for maximum hip eccentric power during late stance (HP2), with increased hip power during dual-task walking in TFAP. Overall, passive prosthetic knee mechanisms showed limited differences, although task-specific adaptations were evident under combined uneven surface and cognitive demands.

双任务与单任务条件下被动假肢膝关节对经股截肢者不均匀柔顺表面行走的影响。
经股骨截肢(TFA)患者在环境和认知挑战下行走时经常经历步态适应。本研究考察了被动式假膝机制对单任务和双任务在不平坦柔顺表面上行走时自我报告的活动能力和步态生物力学的影响。参与者分为健全个体(AB, n = 15)、使用多中心膝关节的TFA个体(TFAP, n = 6)和使用液体控制膝关节的TFA个体(tafc,气动/液压,n = 5)。双任务条件包括在执行听觉Stroop任务的同时行走。结果测量包括自我报告问卷、关节运动学、关节动力学和地面反作用力。采用线性混合效应模型分析生物力学变量,以检验组、任务和组×任务的相互作用效应。自我报告的结果表明,与AB相比,TFA患者的功能活动能力降低。生物力学研究结果显示,与AB相比,两组TFA患者的步态模式都发生了改变,尤其是膝关节屈曲和踝关节跖屈曲减少。对于动力学结果,在所选择的关节力矩和力量变量中观察到显著的组效应,尽管bonferroni调整后的成对差异仅在最大站位髋关节伸展力矩(HM1)中被发现,与AB相比,tafc的值较低。在双任务行走期间,所有组中最大站位踝关节背屈(AA2)均观察到显著的任务效应。在TFAP中,在站立后期(HP2)时髋关节偏心力最大,双任务行走时髋关节偏心力增加,组与任务之间存在显著的交互作用。总体而言,被动假膝机制显示出有限的差异,尽管在不均匀表面和认知需求的联合作用下,任务特异性适应很明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering in Medicine is an interdisciplinary journal encompassing all aspects of engineering in medicine. The Journal is a vital tool for maintaining an understanding of the newest techniques and research in medical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书