{"title":"Rehabilitation and Management in Lateral Medullary Stroke (Wallenberg Syndrome): A Scoping Review and Evidence Map.","authors":"Takafumi Izutsu, Nobuo Kutsuna, Syota Toyama, Kasumi Fujiwara, Kosei Goto, Takao Nakamura","doi":"10.1177/10538135261459633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo map rehabilitation interventions and rehabilitation-relevant management reported for lateral medullary stroke (Wallenberg syndrome) and distinguish direct intervention evidence from management and assessment reports.Data sourcesPubMed/MEDLINE, Ichushi-Web, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception to 12 March 2026. Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature was searched on 24 April 2026. Citation tracking was performed.Review methodsReports were eligible if they described rehabilitation, rehabilitation-relevant management, assessment, prognosis, or monitoring relevant to recovery or safety. Two reviewers screened records; charting and classification were verified by a second reviewer using operational definitions. Reports were grouped by clinical phase, target domain, safety management, outcome measures, and primary reporting function.ResultsThe searches identified 741 records; 486 unique records were screened and 78 reports were included. Publication years ranged from 1997 to 2026; 60 reports were case reports or case series. Primary reporting functions were categorized as explicit intervention/program (n = 29), management/procedural pathway (n = 21), assessment/prognostic/monitoring (n = 18), and minimal-detail supportive/diagnostic (n = 10). Dysphagia was addressed in 63 reports, but only 22 were explicit intervention/program reports. No included report explicitly described sensory safety education.ConclusionThe accessible literature is useful but mixed. Interpretation is limited by unretrieved full-text candidates, omitted databases/grey literature, no critical appraisal, and no independent agreement statistic for post hoc reporting-function classification. Future reports should separate therapeutic training from management pathways and describe dosage, safety management, reassessment timing, discharge function, sensory safety education, and daily-life precautions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"36-47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135261459633","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveTo map rehabilitation interventions and rehabilitation-relevant management reported for lateral medullary stroke (Wallenberg syndrome) and distinguish direct intervention evidence from management and assessment reports.Data sourcesPubMed/MEDLINE, Ichushi-Web, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception to 12 March 2026. Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature was searched on 24 April 2026. Citation tracking was performed.Review methodsReports were eligible if they described rehabilitation, rehabilitation-relevant management, assessment, prognosis, or monitoring relevant to recovery or safety. Two reviewers screened records; charting and classification were verified by a second reviewer using operational definitions. Reports were grouped by clinical phase, target domain, safety management, outcome measures, and primary reporting function.ResultsThe searches identified 741 records; 486 unique records were screened and 78 reports were included. Publication years ranged from 1997 to 2026; 60 reports were case reports or case series. Primary reporting functions were categorized as explicit intervention/program (n = 29), management/procedural pathway (n = 21), assessment/prognostic/monitoring (n = 18), and minimal-detail supportive/diagnostic (n = 10). Dysphagia was addressed in 63 reports, but only 22 were explicit intervention/program reports. No included report explicitly described sensory safety education.ConclusionThe accessible literature is useful but mixed. Interpretation is limited by unretrieved full-text candidates, omitted databases/grey literature, no critical appraisal, and no independent agreement statistic for post hoc reporting-function classification. Future reports should separate therapeutic training from management pathways and describe dosage, safety management, reassessment timing, discharge function, sensory safety education, and daily-life precautions.
期刊介绍:
NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders.
We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.