Comparison of Salivary Stress Biomarkers in Patients with and without Periodontal Diseases: A Cross-sectional Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Rana Hameed Jabr, Omar Husham Ali
{"title":"Comparison of Salivary Stress Biomarkers in Patients with and without Periodontal Diseases: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Rana Hameed Jabr, Omar Husham Ali","doi":"10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the salivary concentrations of cortisol (Cort), chromogranin A (CgA), and alpha-amylase (sAA) in periodontally healthy individuals and individuals with periodontal disease, and to investigate their association with perceived psychological stress, as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 400 participants aged ≥18 years (117 healthy participants, 140 with gingivitis, and 143 with periodontitis). Unstimulated salivary samples were collected from 90 participants systematically randomized from the 400 enrolled in this study. Subsequently, psychological stress was assessed using the PSS, and periodontal parameters were recorded. The ELISA test was used to measure salivary levels of Cort, CgA, and sAA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The means of salivary cortisol concentrations were 33.54 (± 3.77 ng/ml) in controls, 65.89 (± 16.41 ng/ml) and 47.06 (± 4.55 ng/ml) in the gingivitis and periodontitis groups, respectively. Mean CgA concentrations were 724.75 (± 90.70 pg/ml) in controls, 1133.47 (± 302.49 pg/ml) in gingivitis, and 1526.30 (± 433.81 pg/ml) in periodontitis. Additionally, the mean of sAA levels was 24.40 (± 6.91 ng/ml) in the control group, 31.44 (± 3.91 ng/ml) and 34.13 (± 5.64 ng/ml) in the gingivitis and periodontitis groups, respectively. PSS scores were considerably higher in individuals with periodontal disease than in healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Salivary levels of Cort, CgA, and sAA were elevated in individuals with periodontal disease compared to healthy controls. These biomarkers may serve as supportive indicators in the assessment of periodontal disease. However, further studies are required to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19696,"journal":{"name":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","volume":"24 ","pages":"451-460"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13288478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2741","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the salivary concentrations of cortisol (Cort), chromogranin A (CgA), and alpha-amylase (sAA) in periodontally healthy individuals and individuals with periodontal disease, and to investigate their association with perceived psychological stress, as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS).

Materials and methods: The study included 400 participants aged ≥18 years (117 healthy participants, 140 with gingivitis, and 143 with periodontitis). Unstimulated salivary samples were collected from 90 participants systematically randomized from the 400 enrolled in this study. Subsequently, psychological stress was assessed using the PSS, and periodontal parameters were recorded. The ELISA test was used to measure salivary levels of Cort, CgA, and sAA.

Results: The means of salivary cortisol concentrations were 33.54 (± 3.77 ng/ml) in controls, 65.89 (± 16.41 ng/ml) and 47.06 (± 4.55 ng/ml) in the gingivitis and periodontitis groups, respectively. Mean CgA concentrations were 724.75 (± 90.70 pg/ml) in controls, 1133.47 (± 302.49 pg/ml) in gingivitis, and 1526.30 (± 433.81 pg/ml) in periodontitis. Additionally, the mean of sAA levels was 24.40 (± 6.91 ng/ml) in the control group, 31.44 (± 3.91 ng/ml) and 34.13 (± 5.64 ng/ml) in the gingivitis and periodontitis groups, respectively. PSS scores were considerably higher in individuals with periodontal disease than in healthy controls.

Conclusion: Salivary levels of Cort, CgA, and sAA were elevated in individuals with periodontal disease compared to healthy controls. These biomarkers may serve as supportive indicators in the assessment of periodontal disease. However, further studies are required to validate these findings.

牙周病患者和非牙周病患者唾液应激生物标志物的比较:一项横断面研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估牙周健康个体和牙周病患者唾液中皮质醇(Cort)、铬粒蛋白A (CgA)和α -淀粉酶(sAA)的浓度,并通过感知压力量表(PSS)研究它们与感知心理压力的关系。材料与方法:本研究纳入400名年龄≥18岁的受试者(117名健康受试者,140名牙龈炎患者,143名牙周炎患者)。本研究从400名参与者中系统随机抽取90名参与者的非刺激唾液样本。随后使用PSS评估心理压力,并记录牙周参数。ELISA检测唾液中Cort、CgA和sAA的水平。结果:对照组唾液皮质醇浓度均值为33.54(±3.77 ng/ml),牙龈炎组为65.89(±16.41 ng/ml),牙周炎组为47.06(±4.55 ng/ml)。对照组平均CgA浓度为724.75(±90.70 pg/ml),牙龈炎组为1133.47(±302.49 pg/ml),牙周炎组为1526.30(±433.81 pg/ml)。对照组sAA水平平均值为24.40(±6.91 ng/ml),牙龈炎组和牙周炎组sAA水平平均值分别为31.44(±3.91 ng/ml)和34.13(±5.64 ng/ml)。牙周病患者的PSS评分明显高于健康对照组。结论:与健康对照相比,牙周病患者唾液中Cort、CgA和sAA水平升高。这些生物标志物可作为牙周病评估的支持性指标。然而,需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral health & preventive dentistry
Oral health & preventive dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinicians, general practitioners, teachers, researchers, and public health administrators will find this journal an indispensable source of essential, timely information about scientific progress in the fields of oral health and the prevention of caries, periodontal diseases, oral mucosal diseases, and dental trauma. Central topics, including oral hygiene, oral epidemiology, oral health promotion, and public health issues, are covered in peer-reviewed articles such as clinical and basic science research reports; reviews; invited focus articles, commentaries, and guest editorials; and symposium, workshop, and conference proceedings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书