Compression equations in pharmaceutical tableting: from classical compaction models to data-driven and mechanistic approaches.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Tansel Comoglu
{"title":"Compression equations in pharmaceutical tableting: from classical compaction models to data-driven and mechanistic approaches.","authors":"Tansel Comoglu","doi":"10.1080/10837450.2026.2694094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Powder compaction remains the key step in pharmaceutical tablet manufacturing, but its multiscale and path-dependent nature makes accurate prediction of tablet properties difficult. Compression equations have long been used to relate applied pressure to densification, porosity, and mechanical strength, providing descriptors for material comparison and formulation design. Classical models such as Heckel, Kawakita-Lüdde, and Cooper-Eaton remain widely used, although they are limited by pressure-range dependence, sensitivity to in-die versus out-of-die measurements, and restricted mechanistic interpretation. Recent developments have expanded compression modeling to include extended in-die formulations incorporating solid compressibility, continuum constitutive laws for finite-element simulations, particle-scale discrete-element approaches, and data-driven process analytical technology (PAT) frameworks. These approaches are critically evaluated alongside classical equations with respect to constitutive validity, calibration transferability, contact-law realism, computational cost, data governance, model drift, and regulatory acceptability. Together, they form a hierarchical modeling framework spanning empirical screening, mechanistic prediction, and real-time process control. This review integrates classical and emerging compaction models and discusses their relevance to critical quality attributes, scale-up, and digital-twin-enabled pharmaceutical manufacturing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20004,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Development and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"935-956"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Development and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10837450.2026.2694094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Powder compaction remains the key step in pharmaceutical tablet manufacturing, but its multiscale and path-dependent nature makes accurate prediction of tablet properties difficult. Compression equations have long been used to relate applied pressure to densification, porosity, and mechanical strength, providing descriptors for material comparison and formulation design. Classical models such as Heckel, Kawakita-Lüdde, and Cooper-Eaton remain widely used, although they are limited by pressure-range dependence, sensitivity to in-die versus out-of-die measurements, and restricted mechanistic interpretation. Recent developments have expanded compression modeling to include extended in-die formulations incorporating solid compressibility, continuum constitutive laws for finite-element simulations, particle-scale discrete-element approaches, and data-driven process analytical technology (PAT) frameworks. These approaches are critically evaluated alongside classical equations with respect to constitutive validity, calibration transferability, contact-law realism, computational cost, data governance, model drift, and regulatory acceptability. Together, they form a hierarchical modeling framework spanning empirical screening, mechanistic prediction, and real-time process control. This review integrates classical and emerging compaction models and discusses their relevance to critical quality attributes, scale-up, and digital-twin-enabled pharmaceutical manufacturing.

药物压片中的压缩方程:从经典压片模型到数据驱动和机械方法。
粉末压实是制药片剂生产的关键步骤,但其多尺度和路径依赖的性质使得片剂性质的准确预测具有挑战性。长期以来,压缩方程一直用于将施加压力与致密性、孔隙率和机械强度联系起来,为材料比较和配方开发提供描述符。经典模型,包括Heckel, kawakita - ldde和Cooper-Eaton方程,仍然被广泛应用;然而,它们的效用受到压力范围依赖性、对模内和模外测量的敏感性以及有限的机理解释的限制。最近的进展已经扩展了传统经验方程之外的压缩模型。扩展的模具内公式结合了固体可压缩性、有限元法(FEM)模拟中使用的连续本构模型、颗粒尺度离散元法(DEM)方法和数据驱动过程分析技术(PAT)框架,为理解压实提供了更广泛的能力。在这篇综述中,这些方法与经典方程进行了严格的评估。FEM模型在本构有效性和校准可转移性方面进行评估,DEM方法用于接触法现实性和计算效率,PAT和机器学习框架用于数据质量,鲁棒性和监管适用性。这篇综述将经典和新兴的压实模型整合在一个跨越经验筛选、机制预测和过程控制的层次框架内。重点是将致密化行为与关键质量属性、放大考虑因素和数字孪生制造联系起来,为配方开发和制药制造中的模型选择提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
82
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Development & Technology publishes research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of conventional and novel drug delivery systems, emphasizing practical solutions and applications to theoretical and research-based problems. The journal aims to publish significant, innovative and original research to advance the frontiers of pharmaceutical development and technology. Through original articles, reviews (where prior discussion with the EIC is encouraged), short reports, book reviews and technical notes, Pharmaceutical Development & Technology covers aspects such as: -Preformulation and pharmaceutical formulation studies -Pharmaceutical materials selection and characterization -Pharmaceutical process development, engineering, scale-up and industrialisation, and process validation -QbD in the form a risk assessment and DoE driven approaches -Design of dosage forms and drug delivery systems -Emerging pharmaceutical formulation and drug delivery technologies with a focus on personalised therapies -Drug delivery systems research and quality improvement -Pharmaceutical regulatory affairs This journal will not consider for publication manuscripts focusing purely on clinical evaluations, botanicals, or animal models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书