Sara Sousi, Geva Greenfield, Benedict W J Hayhoe, Natasha Singh, Azeem Majeed, Ara Darzi, Ana Luísa Neves
{"title":"The impact of remote care on the quality of care of pregnant women with diabetes: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Sara Sousi, Geva Greenfield, Benedict W J Hayhoe, Natasha Singh, Azeem Majeed, Ara Darzi, Ana Luísa Neves","doi":"10.1186/s13643-026-03244-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes during pregnancy, whether gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or pre-existing diabetes mellitus (DM), is associated with increased maternal and neonatal risks. Remote care has shown promise in managing diabetes in the general population, however, its impact on the quality of antenatal care for pregnant women with diabetes remains unclear. Considering the growing adoption of remote care globally, it is vital to understand its impact on the quality of care. This review aims to evaluate the impact of remote care on the quality of care for pregnant women with diabetes. This manuscript describes the protocol for the review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, MIDIRS, Scopus, Cochrane, and Global Health databases will be searched to identify studies published from 2005 to 2025. Eligible studies will include original empirical research, encompassing both interventional (e.g. randomised controlled trials) and observational designs (e.g. cohort and cross-sectional studies), assessing remote care, including both virtual consultations and remote monitoring, for pregnant women with GDM, Type 1 or 2 DM. Quality of care will be assessed using the Institute of Medicine healthcare quality framework: patient-centredness, effectiveness, safety, efficiency, timeliness, and equity. Screening and data extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers. The quality of the studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. Subgroup analyses will be undertaken to explore variation by diabetes and intervention type. This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P) guideline.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings of this review will provide evidence on the impact of remote care on the quality of care for pregnant women with pre-existing DM and GDM. Strengthening the evidence will support the development of evidence-based implementation strategies and inform policy decisions to ensure safe, effective, and patient-centred use of remote care interventions.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD420251024685.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13543511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03244-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Diabetes during pregnancy, whether gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or pre-existing diabetes mellitus (DM), is associated with increased maternal and neonatal risks. Remote care has shown promise in managing diabetes in the general population, however, its impact on the quality of antenatal care for pregnant women with diabetes remains unclear. Considering the growing adoption of remote care globally, it is vital to understand its impact on the quality of care. This review aims to evaluate the impact of remote care on the quality of care for pregnant women with diabetes. This manuscript describes the protocol for the review.
Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, MIDIRS, Scopus, Cochrane, and Global Health databases will be searched to identify studies published from 2005 to 2025. Eligible studies will include original empirical research, encompassing both interventional (e.g. randomised controlled trials) and observational designs (e.g. cohort and cross-sectional studies), assessing remote care, including both virtual consultations and remote monitoring, for pregnant women with GDM, Type 1 or 2 DM. Quality of care will be assessed using the Institute of Medicine healthcare quality framework: patient-centredness, effectiveness, safety, efficiency, timeliness, and equity. Screening and data extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers. The quality of the studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. Subgroup analyses will be undertaken to explore variation by diabetes and intervention type. This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P) guideline.
Discussion: The findings of this review will provide evidence on the impact of remote care on the quality of care for pregnant women with pre-existing DM and GDM. Strengthening the evidence will support the development of evidence-based implementation strategies and inform policy decisions to ensure safe, effective, and patient-centred use of remote care interventions.
期刊介绍：
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
