An in vitro comparison of bacterial touch contamination prevention between a novel APD cycler connector and existing APD connectors.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
James A Sloand, Jeremy P Burton, Chris I Munday, Arsh K Jain, Osama El Shamy, Rick Pendergraft, Steve J Lindo
{"title":"An in vitro comparison of bacterial touch contamination prevention between a novel APD cycler connector and existing APD connectors.","authors":"James A Sloand, Jeremy P Burton, Chris I Munday, Arsh K Jain, Osama El Shamy, Rick Pendergraft, Steve J Lindo","doi":"10.1177/08968608261461078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPeritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis remains a leading cause of hospitalization, technique failure, and transfer to in-center hemodialysis, with touch contamination during connections accounting for many episodes. Although shrouded connectors and \"flush before fill\" mechanisms reduce contamination risk, most automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) systems incorporate recessed fluid paths on only one side of the tubing-bag interface, potentially allowing bacterial transfer. We evaluated whether bilateral shrouded connectors with recessed fluid paths reduce bacterial contamination during simulated APD therapy.MethodsIn vitro microbiological testing was performed using three APD systems: Vantive/Baxter Claria™ (System A), Fresenius Liberty™ (System C), and Simergent Archimedes™ (System B). Connectors were deliberately contaminated with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> to simulate touch contamination, followed by a simulated APD treatment. Bacterial growth was quantified from pre-therapy flush fluid and the first patient fill (\"mock peritoneum\"). Agar imprinting was used to assess bacterial distribution relative to connector geometry.ResultsBacterial growth adjacent to the fluid path was observed with contaminated System A connectors but not with System B or System C, where growth was confined to the shroud. Quantitative cultures demonstrated markedly higher bacterial transfer with System A compared with System B and System C across both flush and mock peritoneal samples. Systems B and C employing bilateral shrouded, recessed connectors showed bacterial counts several orders of magnitude lower. All aseptic controls were sterile.ConclusionBilateral shrouded connectors with recessed fluid paths substantially reduce transfer of touch contaminants during simulated APD therapy. This design may mitigate a major mechanism of PD-related peritonitis, warranting clinical evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19969,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","volume":" ","pages":"8968608261461078"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608261461078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPeritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis remains a leading cause of hospitalization, technique failure, and transfer to in-center hemodialysis, with touch contamination during connections accounting for many episodes. Although shrouded connectors and "flush before fill" mechanisms reduce contamination risk, most automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) systems incorporate recessed fluid paths on only one side of the tubing-bag interface, potentially allowing bacterial transfer. We evaluated whether bilateral shrouded connectors with recessed fluid paths reduce bacterial contamination during simulated APD therapy.MethodsIn vitro microbiological testing was performed using three APD systems: Vantive/Baxter Claria™ (System A), Fresenius Liberty™ (System C), and Simergent Archimedes™ (System B). Connectors were deliberately contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus to simulate touch contamination, followed by a simulated APD treatment. Bacterial growth was quantified from pre-therapy flush fluid and the first patient fill ("mock peritoneum"). Agar imprinting was used to assess bacterial distribution relative to connector geometry.ResultsBacterial growth adjacent to the fluid path was observed with contaminated System A connectors but not with System B or System C, where growth was confined to the shroud. Quantitative cultures demonstrated markedly higher bacterial transfer with System A compared with System B and System C across both flush and mock peritoneal samples. Systems B and C employing bilateral shrouded, recessed connectors showed bacterial counts several orders of magnitude lower. All aseptic controls were sterile.ConclusionBilateral shrouded connectors with recessed fluid paths substantially reduce transfer of touch contaminants during simulated APD therapy. This design may mitigate a major mechanism of PD-related peritonitis, warranting clinical evaluation.

新型APD循环器连接器与现有APD连接器的体外细菌接触污染预防比较。
背景腹膜透析(PD)相关性腹膜炎仍然是住院、技术失败和转移到中心血液透析的主要原因,在连接过程中接触污染占许多事件。尽管遮盖式接头和“先冲洗后填充”机制降低了污染风险,但大多数自动腹膜透析(APD)系统仅在管袋界面的一侧采用了嵌入式流体路径,这可能会导致细菌转移。我们评估了在模拟APD治疗过程中,带有凹槽流体路径的双侧遮蔽连接器是否减少了细菌污染。方法采用三种APD系统:Vantive/Baxter Claria™(系统A)、Fresenius Liberty™(系统C)和Simergent Archimedes™(系统B)进行体外微生物学检测。故意用金黄色葡萄球菌污染连接器以模拟触摸污染,然后进行模拟APD处理。从治疗前冲洗液和第一次患者填充物(“模拟腹膜”)中量化细菌生长。琼脂印迹用于评估细菌分布相对于连接器的几何形状。结果受污染的系统A接头可观察到流体路径附近的细菌生长,而系统B或系统C则未观察到细菌生长,其生长仅限于覆盖层。定量培养表明,在冲洗和模拟腹膜样本中,与系统B和系统C相比,系统A的细菌转移明显更高。系统B和系统C采用双侧遮蔽的,嵌入式连接器显示细菌计数低几个数量级。所有无菌对照均无菌。结论:在模拟APD治疗过程中,双侧带隐蔽性流体通道的封闭接头可显著减少接触污染物的转移。这种设计可能减轻pd相关腹膜炎的主要机制,值得临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Peritoneal Dialysis International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peritoneal Dialysis International (PDI) is an international publication dedicated to peritoneal dialysis. PDI welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of peritoneal dialysis from scientists working in the peritoneal dialysis field around the world. Peritoneal Dialysis International is included in Index Medicus and indexed in Current Contents/Clinical Practice, the Science Citation Index, and Excerpta Medica (Nephrology/Urology Core Journal). It is also abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts (CA), as well as being indexed in Embase as a priority journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书