Strengths Knowledge Scale (SKS) and Strengths Use Scale (SUS): Revisiting Psychometric Properties and Gender Invariance in the General Spanish Population.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Mireia Santamaria-Rincon, Marta Miragall, Pedro Sarrión, Sara Martínez-Gregorio, Lorena Desdentado, Rosa María Baños
{"title":"Strengths Knowledge Scale (SKS) and Strengths Use Scale (SUS): Revisiting Psychometric Properties and Gender Invariance in the General Spanish Population.","authors":"Mireia Santamaria-Rincon, Marta Miragall, Pedro Sarrión, Sara Martínez-Gregorio, Lorena Desdentado, Rosa María Baños","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2026.2688993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Strengths Knowledge Scale (SKS) and the Strengths Use Scale (SUS) are the most widely used instruments to measure strengths knowledge and strengths use, yet their psychometric properties have not been examined in the general Spanish population and the factor structure of the SUS remains inconclusive. This study examines the factor structure, reliability, construct validity, and gender invariance of both scales in 574 Spanish adults (<i>M</i> = 33.35, <i>SD</i> = 14.89). Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), and measurement invariance analyses were conducted. A unidimensional structure was supported for both scales, although the SUS required correlated residuals between five item pairs to achieve adequate fit. Both scales showed good reliability. Strengths knowledge and strengths use were positively associated with emotional, psychological, and social well-being, while only strengths knowledge was additionally associated with lower anxious and depressive symptomatology. Both scales demonstrated scalar gender invariance. These findings support the psychometric adequacy of the use of the SKS and SUS in the Spanish general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2026.2688993","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Strengths Knowledge Scale (SKS) and the Strengths Use Scale (SUS) are the most widely used instruments to measure strengths knowledge and strengths use, yet their psychometric properties have not been examined in the general Spanish population and the factor structure of the SUS remains inconclusive. This study examines the factor structure, reliability, construct validity, and gender invariance of both scales in 574 Spanish adults (M = 33.35, SD = 14.89). Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), and measurement invariance analyses were conducted. A unidimensional structure was supported for both scales, although the SUS required correlated residuals between five item pairs to achieve adequate fit. Both scales showed good reliability. Strengths knowledge and strengths use were positively associated with emotional, psychological, and social well-being, while only strengths knowledge was additionally associated with lower anxious and depressive symptomatology. Both scales demonstrated scalar gender invariance. These findings support the psychometric adequacy of the use of the SKS and SUS in the Spanish general population.

优势知识量表(SKS)和优势使用量表(SUS):重新审视西班牙普通人群的心理测量特性和性别不变性。
优势知识量表(SKS)和优势使用量表(SUS)是测量优势知识和优势使用的最广泛使用的工具,但它们的心理测量特性尚未在西班牙普通人群中进行检验,SUS的因素结构仍不确定。本研究对574名西班牙成年人(M = 33.35, SD = 14.89)进行了因子结构、信度、结构效度和性别不变性的检验。进行探索性图分析(EGA)、验证性因子分析(CFA)、结构方程建模(SEM)和测量不变性分析。虽然SUS需要五个项目对之间的相关残差来达到足够的拟合,但两个量表都支持单维结构。两种量表均具有良好的信度。优势知识和优势使用与情绪、心理和社会幸福感呈正相关,而只有优势知识与较低的焦虑和抑郁症状相关。两种量表均表现出标量性别不变性。这些发现支持在西班牙普通人群中使用SKS和SUS的心理测量充分性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Assessment (JPA) primarily publishes articles dealing with the development, evaluation, refinement, and application of personality assessment methods. Desirable articles address empirical, theoretical, instructional, or professional aspects of using psychological tests, interview data, or the applied clinical assessment process. They also advance the measurement, description, or understanding of personality, psychopathology, and human behavior. JPA is broadly concerned with developing and using personality assessment methods in clinical, counseling, forensic, and health psychology settings; with the assessment process in applied clinical practice; with the assessment of people of all ages and cultures; and with both normal and abnormal personality functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书