Strengths Knowledge Scale (SKS) and Strengths Use Scale (SUS): Revisiting Psychometric Properties and Gender Invariance in the General Spanish Population.
Mireia Santamaria-Rincon, Marta Miragall, Pedro Sarrión, Sara Martínez-Gregorio, Lorena Desdentado, Rosa María Baños
{"title":"Strengths Knowledge Scale (SKS) and Strengths Use Scale (SUS): Revisiting Psychometric Properties and Gender Invariance in the General Spanish Population.","authors":"Mireia Santamaria-Rincon, Marta Miragall, Pedro Sarrión, Sara Martínez-Gregorio, Lorena Desdentado, Rosa María Baños","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2026.2688993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Strengths Knowledge Scale (SKS) and the Strengths Use Scale (SUS) are the most widely used instruments to measure strengths knowledge and strengths use, yet their psychometric properties have not been examined in the general Spanish population and the factor structure of the SUS remains inconclusive. This study examines the factor structure, reliability, construct validity, and gender invariance of both scales in 574 Spanish adults (<i>M</i> = 33.35, <i>SD</i> = 14.89). Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), and measurement invariance analyses were conducted. A unidimensional structure was supported for both scales, although the SUS required correlated residuals between five item pairs to achieve adequate fit. Both scales showed good reliability. Strengths knowledge and strengths use were positively associated with emotional, psychological, and social well-being, while only strengths knowledge was additionally associated with lower anxious and depressive symptomatology. Both scales demonstrated scalar gender invariance. These findings support the psychometric adequacy of the use of the SKS and SUS in the Spanish general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2026.2688993","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Strengths Knowledge Scale (SKS) and the Strengths Use Scale (SUS) are the most widely used instruments to measure strengths knowledge and strengths use, yet their psychometric properties have not been examined in the general Spanish population and the factor structure of the SUS remains inconclusive. This study examines the factor structure, reliability, construct validity, and gender invariance of both scales in 574 Spanish adults (M = 33.35, SD = 14.89). Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), and measurement invariance analyses were conducted. A unidimensional structure was supported for both scales, although the SUS required correlated residuals between five item pairs to achieve adequate fit. Both scales showed good reliability. Strengths knowledge and strengths use were positively associated with emotional, psychological, and social well-being, while only strengths knowledge was additionally associated with lower anxious and depressive symptomatology. Both scales demonstrated scalar gender invariance. These findings support the psychometric adequacy of the use of the SKS and SUS in the Spanish general population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Personality Assessment (JPA) primarily publishes articles dealing with the development, evaluation, refinement, and application of personality assessment methods. Desirable articles address empirical, theoretical, instructional, or professional aspects of using psychological tests, interview data, or the applied clinical assessment process. They also advance the measurement, description, or understanding of personality, psychopathology, and human behavior. JPA is broadly concerned with developing and using personality assessment methods in clinical, counseling, forensic, and health psychology settings; with the assessment process in applied clinical practice; with the assessment of people of all ages and cultures; and with both normal and abnormal personality functioning.