A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Biological Sex Differences in Sleep Spindles and Slow Wave Activity in Adults With and Without Insomnia

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Sleep Research Pub Date : 2026-09-28 Epub Date: 2026-06-22 DOI:10.1111/jsr.70388
Nyissa A. Walsh, Emma-Maria Phillips, Arsenio Páez, Nathan E. Cross, Thien Thanh Dang-Vu, Aurore A. Perrault
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Biological Sex Differences in Sleep Spindles and Slow Wave Activity in Adults With and Without Insomnia","authors":"Nyissa A. Walsh,&nbsp;Emma-Maria Phillips,&nbsp;Arsenio Páez,&nbsp;Nathan E. Cross,&nbsp;Thien Thanh Dang-Vu,&nbsp;Aurore A. Perrault","doi":"10.1111/jsr.70388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mounting evidence shows sex-based differences in sleep experiences and outcomes, including the prevalence of insomnia disorder. However, the impact of biological sex on brain oscillations during sleep remains poorly understood, especially in the context of insomnia disorder. This is a notable gap, given that neurophysiological aspects of sleep are associated with brain health and overall sleep quality. We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed data from studies reporting spindle and slow wave activity in adults with and without insomnia disorder. We conducted systematic searches in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and PsycInfo. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa and the PEDro scales. Forty-three studies met our inclusion criteria, with thirteen studies of normal sleepers (<i>N</i> = 668) reporting sufficient data for random-effects meta-analyses. Compared with males, female normal sleepers had higher spindle density, sigma and delta power. Most studies recruited individuals with primary insomnia, and data pooling for insomnia and mixed groups was not possible due to insufficient statistical reporting. Moreover, group-by-sex interactions were limited, inconsistent, and varied across studies and sample characteristics. Further research is needed to explore sex-specific differences in sleep microarchitecture and their role in normal sleep and the manifestation of insomnia disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":"35 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jsr.70388","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsr.70388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mounting evidence shows sex-based differences in sleep experiences and outcomes, including the prevalence of insomnia disorder. However, the impact of biological sex on brain oscillations during sleep remains poorly understood, especially in the context of insomnia disorder. This is a notable gap, given that neurophysiological aspects of sleep are associated with brain health and overall sleep quality. We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed data from studies reporting spindle and slow wave activity in adults with and without insomnia disorder. We conducted systematic searches in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and PsycInfo. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa and the PEDro scales. Forty-three studies met our inclusion criteria, with thirteen studies of normal sleepers (N = 668) reporting sufficient data for random-effects meta-analyses. Compared with males, female normal sleepers had higher spindle density, sigma and delta power. Most studies recruited individuals with primary insomnia, and data pooling for insomnia and mixed groups was not possible due to insufficient statistical reporting. Moreover, group-by-sex interactions were limited, inconsistent, and varied across studies and sample characteristics. Further research is needed to explore sex-specific differences in sleep microarchitecture and their role in normal sleep and the manifestation of insomnia disorder.

有失眠和无失眠的成人睡眠纺锤波和慢波活动的生物学性别差异的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
越来越多的证据表明,睡眠经历和结果的性别差异,包括失眠障碍的患病率。然而,生理性别对睡眠期间大脑振荡的影响仍然知之甚少,特别是在失眠障碍的背景下。这是一个显著的差距,因为睡眠的神经生理方面与大脑健康和整体睡眠质量有关。我们系统地回顾和荟萃分析了来自有和没有失眠障碍的成年人的纺锤波和慢波活动的研究数据。我们在PubMed, Embase, Scopus和PsycInfo中进行了系统的搜索。使用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表和佩德罗量表评估偏倚风险。43项研究符合我们的纳入标准,其中13项正常睡眠者研究(N = 668)报告了足够的随机效应荟萃分析数据。与男性相比,女性正常睡眠者的纺锤体密度、sigma和delta功率更高。大多数研究招募了原发性失眠症患者,由于统计报告不足,无法对失眠症和混合组进行数据汇集。此外,性别群体的相互作用是有限的、不一致的,并且在研究和样本特征之间存在差异。睡眠微结构的性别差异及其在正常睡眠和失眠障碍表现中的作用有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书