Effect of Visualized Respiratory Training on Patient Cooperation and Image Quality in Gadoxetic Acid Disodium-Enhanced Liver MRI: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-23 DOI:10.1002/jmri.70423
Li Mei, Xin Luo, Bingyan Wang, Junfeng Wang, Chao Huang, Xuemei Hu, Qin Li, Wenyan Zhang
{"title":"Effect of Visualized Respiratory Training on Patient Cooperation and Image Quality in Gadoxetic Acid Disodium-Enhanced Liver MRI: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Li Mei, Xin Luo, Bingyan Wang, Junfeng Wang, Chao Huang, Xuemei Hu, Qin Li, Wenyan Zhang","doi":"10.1002/jmri.70423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory motion artifacts impair diagnostic accuracy in gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced liver MRI. Conventional verbal pre-scan breathing training often yields inconsistent patient cooperation and image quality, creating an urgent clinical need for optimized training methods.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of a visualized respiratory training method integrated into clinical workflow on patient cooperation, image quality, and examination efficiency for Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>One hundred and eighty-four patients (135 males; mean age 53.5 ± 13.3 years) scheduled for first-time Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI.</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>3 T; Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging was performed with a 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence, covering pre-contrast, arterial, portal venous, transitional, and hepatobiliary phases.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Primary outcome was patient cooperation rate assessed by blinded MRI technologists. Secondary outcomes included motion artifact scores (rated by three blinded radiologists), Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR), transient severe motion (TSM) incidence, and examination duration.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, and Gamma correlation; two-tailed p < 0.05 indicated significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experimental group (85 patients) had a significantly higher full cooperation rate (56.5% [48/85] vs. 27.3% [27/99], OR = 3.46, 95% CI: 1.87, 6.40, γ = 0.406), significantly lower motion artifact scores in arterial/portal venous/transitional phases, and significantly higher arterial and transitional phase SNR/CNR. The experimental group also showed significantly shorter preparation time (14.40 ± 2.36 vs. 16.16 ± 2.20 min; mean difference: -1.76 min; 95% CI: -2.42, -1.101). Scanning time did not differ significantly between groups (24.60 ± 1.60 vs. 24.89 ± 2.21 min; p = 0.329). TSM incidence did not differ significantly between groups (1.18% vs. 5.05%, p = 0.219).</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>Visualized respiratory training significantly improves patient cooperation, image quality, and workflow efficiency in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI, with no additional resource requirements supporting its routine clinical adoption.</p><p><strong>Evidence level: </strong>2.</p><p><strong>Technical efficacy: </strong>Stage 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"1384-1395"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13667308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Respiratory motion artifacts impair diagnostic accuracy in gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced liver MRI. Conventional verbal pre-scan breathing training often yields inconsistent patient cooperation and image quality, creating an urgent clinical need for optimized training methods.

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of a visualized respiratory training method integrated into clinical workflow on patient cooperation, image quality, and examination efficiency for Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI.

Study type: Prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial.

Population: One hundred and eighty-four patients (135 males; mean age 53.5 ± 13.3 years) scheduled for first-time Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI.

Field strength/sequence: 3 T; Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging was performed with a 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence, covering pre-contrast, arterial, portal venous, transitional, and hepatobiliary phases.

Assessment: Primary outcome was patient cooperation rate assessed by blinded MRI technologists. Secondary outcomes included motion artifact scores (rated by three blinded radiologists), Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR), transient severe motion (TSM) incidence, and examination duration.

Statistical tests: Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, and Gamma correlation; two-tailed p < 0.05 indicated significance.

Results: The experimental group (85 patients) had a significantly higher full cooperation rate (56.5% [48/85] vs. 27.3% [27/99], OR = 3.46, 95% CI: 1.87, 6.40, γ = 0.406), significantly lower motion artifact scores in arterial/portal venous/transitional phases, and significantly higher arterial and transitional phase SNR/CNR. The experimental group also showed significantly shorter preparation time (14.40 ± 2.36 vs. 16.16 ± 2.20 min; mean difference: -1.76 min; 95% CI: -2.42, -1.101). Scanning time did not differ significantly between groups (24.60 ± 1.60 vs. 24.89 ± 2.21 min; p = 0.329). TSM incidence did not differ significantly between groups (1.18% vs. 5.05%, p = 0.219).

Data conclusion: Visualized respiratory training significantly improves patient cooperation, image quality, and workflow efficiency in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI, with no additional resource requirements supporting its routine clinical adoption.

Evidence level: 2.

Technical efficacy: Stage 1.

可视化呼吸训练对加多乙酸二钠增强肝脏MRI患者配合和图像质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:呼吸运动伪影影响加多己酸二钠(Gd-EOB-DTPA)增强肝脏MRI的诊断准确性。传统的口头扫描前呼吸训练通常会产生不一致的患者合作和图像质量,因此迫切需要优化的训练方法。目的:评估可视化呼吸训练方法与临床工作流程相结合对gd - eob - dtpa增强肝脏MRI患者配合、图像质量和检查效率的影响。研究类型:前瞻性、单中心、随机对照试验。人群:184例患者(男性135例,平均年龄53.5±13.3岁)计划首次进行gd - eob - dtpa增强肝脏MRI。场强/序列:3t;采用3D快速破坏梯度回声序列进行动态增强成像,覆盖对比前、动脉、门静脉、过渡期和肝胆期。评估:主要结果是盲法MRI技术评估患者的配合率。次要结果包括运动伪影评分(由三名盲法放射科医生评定)、信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)、短暂严重运动发生率(TSM)和检查持续时间。统计检验:学生t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、卡方检验和Gamma相关性;结果:实验组(85例)患者的完全配合率显著高于对照组(56.5% [48/85]vs. 27.3% [27/99], OR = 3.46, 95% CI: 1.87, 6.40, γ = 0.406),动脉/门静脉/过渡期运动伪像评分显著低于对照组,动脉和过渡期SNR/CNR显著高于对照组。实验组的制备时间也明显缩短(14.40±2.36 vs. 16.16±2.20 min,平均差值:-1.76 min, 95% CI: -2.42, -1.101)。扫描时间组间差异无统计学意义(24.60±1.60 vs. 24.89±2.21 min; p = 0.329)。两组间TSM发病率无显著差异(1.18% vs. 5.05%, p = 0.219)。数据结论:可视化呼吸训练显著提高了gd - eob - dtpa增强肝脏MRI的患者配合度、图像质量和工作效率,无需额外的资源支持其常规临床应用。证据等级:2。技术功效:第一阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书