Total hip replacement after gunshot hip injuries: a severity-based clinical framework-a single-centre experience.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Mohamed Abo-Elsoud, Mostafa Ahmed Shawky, Mahmoud Fahmy
{"title":"Total hip replacement after gunshot hip injuries: a severity-based clinical framework-a single-centre experience.","authors":"Mohamed Abo-Elsoud, Mostafa Ahmed Shawky, Mahmoud Fahmy","doi":"10.1186/s13018-026-07037-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Gunshot hip injuries present major reconstructive challenges due to contamination, retained projectiles, soft-tissue compromise, and variable bone loss. Total hip replacement (THR) in this setting carries increased risks of infection, instability, and technical failure. This study evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of THR following gunshot hip trauma using a structured, severity-based subclassification to inform reconstructive strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients with gunshot hip injuries underwent surgical debridement followed by THR, performed as single-stage or staged procedures according to injury severity, contamination, and systemic condition. Injuries were categorized into three groups: structurally benign injuries; severe or neglected injuries with major bone or soft-tissue compromise; and complex abdominopelvic traversing injuries with visceral involvement. Reconstruction predominantly used cementless acetabular components, with selective use of long femoral stems, revision cups, dual-mobility designs, and bone grafts or porous metal augments. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and WOMAC index, and radiological evaluation focused on component stability and graft incorporation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 patients were included: 11 in Group I (structurally benign injuries), 10 in Group II (severe or neglected injuries), and 9 in Group III (complex abdominopelvic traversing injuries). At a mean follow-up of 46 ± 10 (24-72) months, the mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) was 84 ± 10 and the mean WOMAC score was 19 ± 7. Operative complexity and blood loss increased with injury severity. Two-stage THR was required in 27% of Group I, 60% of Group II, and 100% of Group III. Radiographs demonstrated stable component fixation in all hips, with complete graft or augment incorporation within 6-12 months. Postoperative complications occurred in five patients, predominantly in higher-severity groups. Functional outcomes were inversely related to injury severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>THR after gunshot hip injury achieved satisfactory mid-term functional and radiological outcomes in this single-center cohort. Staged reconstruction and advanced implant strategies appear beneficial in managing complex and contaminated injuries. These findings are descriptive and intended to inform clinical decision-making; further studies are required for external validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13307706/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07037-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Gunshot hip injuries present major reconstructive challenges due to contamination, retained projectiles, soft-tissue compromise, and variable bone loss. Total hip replacement (THR) in this setting carries increased risks of infection, instability, and technical failure. This study evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of THR following gunshot hip trauma using a structured, severity-based subclassification to inform reconstructive strategy.

Methods: Thirty patients with gunshot hip injuries underwent surgical debridement followed by THR, performed as single-stage or staged procedures according to injury severity, contamination, and systemic condition. Injuries were categorized into three groups: structurally benign injuries; severe or neglected injuries with major bone or soft-tissue compromise; and complex abdominopelvic traversing injuries with visceral involvement. Reconstruction predominantly used cementless acetabular components, with selective use of long femoral stems, revision cups, dual-mobility designs, and bone grafts or porous metal augments. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and WOMAC index, and radiological evaluation focused on component stability and graft incorporation.

Results: A total of 30 patients were included: 11 in Group I (structurally benign injuries), 10 in Group II (severe or neglected injuries), and 9 in Group III (complex abdominopelvic traversing injuries). At a mean follow-up of 46 ± 10 (24-72) months, the mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) was 84 ± 10 and the mean WOMAC score was 19 ± 7. Operative complexity and blood loss increased with injury severity. Two-stage THR was required in 27% of Group I, 60% of Group II, and 100% of Group III. Radiographs demonstrated stable component fixation in all hips, with complete graft or augment incorporation within 6-12 months. Postoperative complications occurred in five patients, predominantly in higher-severity groups. Functional outcomes were inversely related to injury severity.

Conclusions: THR after gunshot hip injury achieved satisfactory mid-term functional and radiological outcomes in this single-center cohort. Staged reconstruction and advanced implant strategies appear beneficial in managing complex and contaminated injuries. These findings are descriptive and intended to inform clinical decision-making; further studies are required for external validation.

髋部枪伤后全髋关节置换术:基于严重程度的临床框架-单中心经验。
目的:由于污染、残留弹丸、软组织损伤和可变骨丢失,髋部枪伤带来了重大的重建挑战。在这种情况下,全髋关节置换术(THR)会增加感染、不稳定和技术失败的风险。本研究采用结构化的、基于严重程度的亚分类来评估髋部枪伤后THR的临床和放射学结果,为重建策略提供信息。方法:30例髋部枪伤患者行手术清创后THR,根据损伤严重程度、污染程度和全身状况分为单阶段或分阶段进行。损伤分为三组:结构良性损伤;严重的或被忽视的损伤,主要的骨骼或软组织受损;以及累及内脏的复杂的骨盆穿越伤。重建主要使用无骨水泥的髋臼假体,选择性使用长股骨干、翻修杯、双活动设计、骨移植物或多孔金属增强物。临床结果采用Harris髋关节评分(HHS)和WOMAC指数进行评估,放射学评估侧重于组件稳定性和移植物结合。结果:共纳入30例患者:ⅰ组11例(结构良性损伤),ⅱ组10例(严重或忽视损伤),ⅲ组9例(复杂的腹部-骨盆穿越损伤)。平均随访46±10(24-72)个月,Harris髋关节评分(HHS)平均值为84±10,WOMAC评分平均值为19±7。手术复杂性和出血量随损伤严重程度的增加而增加。27%的组I、60%的组II和100%的组III需要两阶段THR。x线片显示在6-12个月内,所有髋关节均有稳定的假体固定。5例患者出现术后并发症,主要发生在严重程度较高的组。功能结局与损伤严重程度呈负相关。结论:在这个单中心队列中,髋关节枪伤后THR获得了令人满意的中期功能和放射学结果。分阶段重建和先进的种植策略似乎有利于处理复杂和污染的损伤。这些发现是描述性的,旨在为临床决策提供信息;需要进一步的研究来进行外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书