{"title":"Clinical efficacy of lacosamide in neuropathic pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Gurleen Kaur, Chander Singh, Maryam Altuhafy, Junad Khan","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2026.2688513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neuropathic pain is considered the most difficult to manage, with many patients getting inadequate relief from the current pharmacotherapy. While many drugs have been added to the regimen, Lacosamide has emerged as a promising therapeutic option. This systematic review focuses on the efficacy and safety of lacosamide in adult patients with neuropathic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched thoroughly for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) published in English through November 2025. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs involving 976 participants with different neuropathic pain conditions met the inclusion criteria. Across the included studies, Lacosamide (200-600 mg/day) provided a modest reduction in their pain scores. However, it didn't have much of a positive impact on quality of life, limited function, adverse effects were common, and a high dropout rate was observed in several trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lacosamide might provide a modest analgesic benefit across multiple neuropathic conditions. But its extensive, long-term use requires more research to confirm its benefits, particularly the optimum dosing protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"805-815"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2026.2688513","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Neuropathic pain is considered the most difficult to manage, with many patients getting inadequate relief from the current pharmacotherapy. While many drugs have been added to the regimen, Lacosamide has emerged as a promising therapeutic option. This systematic review focuses on the efficacy and safety of lacosamide in adult patients with neuropathic pain.
Methods: Databases such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched thoroughly for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) published in English through November 2025. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.
Results: Eight RCTs involving 976 participants with different neuropathic pain conditions met the inclusion criteria. Across the included studies, Lacosamide (200-600 mg/day) provided a modest reduction in their pain scores. However, it didn't have much of a positive impact on quality of life, limited function, adverse effects were common, and a high dropout rate was observed in several trials.
Conclusion: Lacosamide might provide a modest analgesic benefit across multiple neuropathic conditions. But its extensive, long-term use requires more research to confirm its benefits, particularly the optimum dosing protocols.
导读:神经性疼痛被认为是最难控制的,许多患者从目前的药物治疗中得不到充分的缓解。虽然许多药物已被添加到该方案中,但拉科沙胺已成为一种有希望的治疗选择。本系统综述的重点是拉科沙胺在成人神经性疼痛患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:全面检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane等数据库,检索截至2025年11月发表的英文随机对照试验(RCTs)。使用Cochrane风险偏倚2工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。结果:8项随机对照试验共纳入976名不同神经性疼痛症状的受试者,符合纳入标准。在纳入的研究中,拉科沙胺(200-600毫克/天)可以适度降低疼痛评分。然而,它对生活质量没有太大的积极影响,功能受限,不良反应很常见,并且在几个试验中观察到高辍学率。结论:拉科沙胺可能对多种神经性疾病提供适度的镇痛作用。但它的广泛、长期使用需要更多的研究来证实它的好处,特别是最佳的给药方案。
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points