Online Andrology: Real-World Status Quo of Patients' Online Information Sources and Comparison With Large Language Models in Germany.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ANDROLOGY
Andrology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-22 DOI:10.1111/andr.70286
Traeger Max, Gloeckler Paulina, Hess Jochen, Kranz Jennifer, Morgenstern Saskia, Himmelsbach Ruth, Gratzke Christian, Schlager Daniel
{"title":"Online Andrology: Real-World Status Quo of Patients' Online Information Sources and Comparison With Large Language Models in Germany.","authors":"Traeger Max, Gloeckler Paulina, Hess Jochen, Kranz Jennifer, Morgenstern Saskia, Himmelsbach Ruth, Gratzke Christian, Schlager Daniel","doi":"10.1111/andr.70286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The internet, including websites and large language models (LLMs), is an increasingly important information resource for medical patients. However, information quality varies, potentially leading to misinformation. Andrological patients may particularly rely on online sources due to the sensitive nature of their conditions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the prevalence and quality of internet research among andrological patients and evaluate common online sources for comprehensibility, readability, and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients (n = 283) at four German andrological centers completed a questionnaire on their online information behavior between November 2022 and October 2023. Common online sources were objectively evaluated using the DISCERN tool and Flesch readability index in 2023. Popular LLMs were also assessed in October 2024 and compared to traditional websites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>67% (n = 190/283) of andrological patients seek medical information before appointments, primarily using the internet (52%, n = 148/283) and general practitioners (49%, n = 139/283). Patients under 50 predominantly use online sources (60%, n = 74/122). Official medical association websites and Wikipedia are preferred, but 30% also use commercial sites (n = 91/283). In general, most common websites and LLMs provide sufficient information but lack easy comprehensibility and readability.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study highlights the widespread use of online resources by andrological patients and emphasizes the importance of high-quality medical information. While online tools show promise, the value of physician-patient communication remains irreplaceable and cannot be replaced by chatting with LLMs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Official medical association should provide accurate and easily understood information for andrological patients. Efforts to improve the online media literacy and communication skills of medical personnel are necessary.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>The study was registered in the German WHO primary registry, the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) (Number: DRKS00029651).</p>","PeriodicalId":7898,"journal":{"name":"Andrology","volume":" ","pages":"1823-1830"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13432683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.70286","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The internet, including websites and large language models (LLMs), is an increasingly important information resource for medical patients. However, information quality varies, potentially leading to misinformation. Andrological patients may particularly rely on online sources due to the sensitive nature of their conditions.

Objectives: To assess the prevalence and quality of internet research among andrological patients and evaluate common online sources for comprehensibility, readability, and accuracy.

Materials and methods: Patients (n = 283) at four German andrological centers completed a questionnaire on their online information behavior between November 2022 and October 2023. Common online sources were objectively evaluated using the DISCERN tool and Flesch readability index in 2023. Popular LLMs were also assessed in October 2024 and compared to traditional websites.

Results: 67% (n = 190/283) of andrological patients seek medical information before appointments, primarily using the internet (52%, n = 148/283) and general practitioners (49%, n = 139/283). Patients under 50 predominantly use online sources (60%, n = 74/122). Official medical association websites and Wikipedia are preferred, but 30% also use commercial sites (n = 91/283). In general, most common websites and LLMs provide sufficient information but lack easy comprehensibility and readability.

Discussion: The study highlights the widespread use of online resources by andrological patients and emphasizes the importance of high-quality medical information. While online tools show promise, the value of physician-patient communication remains irreplaceable and cannot be replaced by chatting with LLMs.

Conclusion: Official medical association should provide accurate and easily understood information for andrological patients. Efforts to improve the online media literacy and communication skills of medical personnel are necessary.

Trial registration number: The study was registered in the German WHO primary registry, the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) (Number: DRKS00029651).

在线男科:德国患者在线信息源的现实现状及与大型语言模型的比较
背景:互联网,包括网站和大型语言模型(llm),是医疗患者越来越重要的信息资源。然而,信息质量参差不齐,可能导致错误信息。由于其病情的敏感性,男性患者可能特别依赖在线资源。目的:评估男科患者中互联网研究的流行程度和质量,并评估常见的在线资源的可理解性、可读性和准确性。材料和方法:在2022年11月至2023年10月期间,德国四个男科中心的患者(n = 283)完成了一份关于他们在线信息行为的调查问卷。在2023年使用DISCERN工具和Flesch可读性指数对常见的在线资源进行客观评估。热门法学硕士也在2024年10月进行了评估,并与传统网站进行了比较。结果:67% (n = 190/283)的男科患者在预约前寻求医疗信息,主要是通过互联网(52%,n = 148/283)和全科医生(49%,n = 139/283)。50岁以下的患者主要使用在线资源(60%,n = 74/122)。官方医学协会网站和维基百科是首选,但30%的人也使用商业网站(n = 91/283)。一般来说,大多数常见的网站和法学硕士提供了足够的信息,但缺乏易于理解和可读性。讨论:该研究强调了男性患者广泛使用在线资源,并强调了高质量医疗信息的重要性。虽然在线工具显示出前景,但医患交流的价值仍然是不可替代的,不能被与法学硕士聊天所取代。结论:官方医学协会应为男性患者提供准确易懂的信息。必须努力提高医务人员的网络媒体素养和沟通技巧。试验注册号:该研究已在德国世卫组织主要注册中心德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS)注册(编号:DRKS00029651)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Andrology
Andrology ANDROLOGY-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Andrology is the study of the male reproductive system and other male gender related health issues. Andrology deals with basic and clinical aspects of the male reproductive system (gonads, endocrine and accessory organs) in all species, including the diagnosis and treatment of medical problems associated with sexual development, infertility, sexual dysfunction, sex hormone action and other urological problems. In medicine, Andrology as a specialty is a recent development, as it had previously been considered a subspecialty of urology or endocrinology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书