{"title":"Winner takes all? Understanding the impact of energy transition on employment under the constraint of China’s carbon peak target","authors":"Jianhui Cong, Rui Li, Weiqiang Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13021-026-00475-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Achieving carbon peak and carbon neutrality requires not only reducing emissions but also managing the macroeconomic side effects of the energy transition. This study examines employment reallocation as a carbon transition management problem rather than as a conventional labor market performance issue. We develop an integrated multi-regional input-output (MRIO) and multi-objective optimization model to simulate how China’s carbon peak constrained energy transition reshapes formal labor demand across 42 sectors and 31 provinces. The novelty of this study lies in linking a theoretical mechanism of capital biased energy transition with a detailed interregional production network, thereby identifying where the social costs of decarbonization are likely to concentrate. Our results show that although the transition increases aggregate employment, it generates a clear “winner takes all” pattern. Employment gains are captured mainly by economically developed coastal regions and high value added service and power related sectors, while less developed inland and resource dependent regions face severe losses. Shanxi, a typical coal dependent province, could lose nearly 10% of formal employment opportunities, and job growth in renewables is insufficient to fully offset losses in traditional fossil fuel and power industries. These findings provide policy relevant evidence for carbon management by showing that carbon peak pathways must be evaluated not only by emission outcomes but also by their spatial and sectoral employment risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13021-026-00475-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-026-00475-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Achieving carbon peak and carbon neutrality requires not only reducing emissions but also managing the macroeconomic side effects of the energy transition. This study examines employment reallocation as a carbon transition management problem rather than as a conventional labor market performance issue. We develop an integrated multi-regional input-output (MRIO) and multi-objective optimization model to simulate how China’s carbon peak constrained energy transition reshapes formal labor demand across 42 sectors and 31 provinces. The novelty of this study lies in linking a theoretical mechanism of capital biased energy transition with a detailed interregional production network, thereby identifying where the social costs of decarbonization are likely to concentrate. Our results show that although the transition increases aggregate employment, it generates a clear “winner takes all” pattern. Employment gains are captured mainly by economically developed coastal regions and high value added service and power related sectors, while less developed inland and resource dependent regions face severe losses. Shanxi, a typical coal dependent province, could lose nearly 10% of formal employment opportunities, and job growth in renewables is insufficient to fully offset losses in traditional fossil fuel and power industries. These findings provide policy relevant evidence for carbon management by showing that carbon peak pathways must be evaluated not only by emission outcomes but also by their spatial and sectoral employment risks.
期刊介绍:
Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle.
The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community.
This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system.
Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.