Winner takes all? Understanding the impact of energy transition on employment under the constraint of China’s carbon peak target

IF 7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Carbon Balance and Management Pub Date : 2026-06-23 Epub Date: 2026-06-29 DOI:10.1186/s13021-026-00475-9
Jianhui Cong, Rui Li, Weiqiang Zhang
{"title":"Winner takes all? Understanding the impact of energy transition on employment under the constraint of China’s carbon peak target","authors":"Jianhui Cong,&nbsp;Rui Li,&nbsp;Weiqiang Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13021-026-00475-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Achieving carbon peak and carbon neutrality requires not only reducing emissions but also managing the macroeconomic side effects of the energy transition. This study examines employment reallocation as a carbon transition management problem rather than as a conventional labor market performance issue. We develop an integrated multi-regional input-output (MRIO) and multi-objective optimization model to simulate how China’s carbon peak constrained energy transition reshapes formal labor demand across 42 sectors and 31 provinces. The novelty of this study lies in linking a theoretical mechanism of capital biased energy transition with a detailed interregional production network, thereby identifying where the social costs of decarbonization are likely to concentrate. Our results show that although the transition increases aggregate employment, it generates a clear “winner takes all” pattern. Employment gains are captured mainly by economically developed coastal regions and high value added service and power related sectors, while less developed inland and resource dependent regions face severe losses. Shanxi, a typical coal dependent province, could lose nearly 10% of formal employment opportunities, and job growth in renewables is insufficient to fully offset losses in traditional fossil fuel and power industries. These findings provide policy relevant evidence for carbon management by showing that carbon peak pathways must be evaluated not only by emission outcomes but also by their spatial and sectoral employment risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13021-026-00475-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-026-00475-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving carbon peak and carbon neutrality requires not only reducing emissions but also managing the macroeconomic side effects of the energy transition. This study examines employment reallocation as a carbon transition management problem rather than as a conventional labor market performance issue. We develop an integrated multi-regional input-output (MRIO) and multi-objective optimization model to simulate how China’s carbon peak constrained energy transition reshapes formal labor demand across 42 sectors and 31 provinces. The novelty of this study lies in linking a theoretical mechanism of capital biased energy transition with a detailed interregional production network, thereby identifying where the social costs of decarbonization are likely to concentrate. Our results show that although the transition increases aggregate employment, it generates a clear “winner takes all” pattern. Employment gains are captured mainly by economically developed coastal regions and high value added service and power related sectors, while less developed inland and resource dependent regions face severe losses. Shanxi, a typical coal dependent province, could lose nearly 10% of formal employment opportunities, and job growth in renewables is insufficient to fully offset losses in traditional fossil fuel and power industries. These findings provide policy relevant evidence for carbon management by showing that carbon peak pathways must be evaluated not only by emission outcomes but also by their spatial and sectoral employment risks.

Abstract Image

赢家通吃?理解中国碳峰值目标约束下能源转型对就业的影响。
实现碳峰值和碳中和不仅需要减少排放,还需要管理能源转型的宏观经济副作用。本研究将就业再分配视为碳转型管理问题,而不是传统的劳动力市场绩效问题。我们建立了一个多区域投入产出(MRIO)和多目标优化模型,模拟中国碳峰值约束下的能源转型如何重塑中国31个省份42个行业的正式劳动力需求。本研究的新颖之处在于将资本偏向能源转型的理论机制与详细的区域间生产网络联系起来,从而确定脱碳的社会成本可能集中在哪里。我们的研究结果表明,虽然转型增加了总就业,但它产生了明显的“赢家通吃”模式。就业增长主要由经济发达的沿海地区和高附加值的服务和电力相关部门获得,而欠发达的内陆和依赖资源的地区则面临严重损失。作为一个典型的煤炭依赖省份,山西可能会失去近10%的正式就业机会,而可再生能源的就业增长不足以完全抵消传统化石燃料和电力行业的损失。这些发现表明,评估碳峰值路径不仅要考虑排放结果,还要考虑其空间和部门就业风险,为碳管理提供了与政策相关的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Carbon Balance and Management
Carbon Balance and Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle. The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community. This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system. Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书