Can long-term survival models improve inference in seed germination studies? Evidence from tropical forest species.

IF 4.1 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Sebastião Martins Filho, Marciel Lelis Duarte, Lausanne Soraya de Almeida, Glauciana da Mata Ataíde, Barbara França Dantas
{"title":"Can long-term survival models improve inference in seed germination studies? Evidence from tropical forest species.","authors":"Sebastião Martins Filho, Marciel Lelis Duarte, Lausanne Soraya de Almeida, Glauciana da Mata Ataíde, Barbara França Dantas","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcag175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Seed germination analysis often ignores temporal dynamics and non-germinating fractions, limiting biological inference. Conventional methods assume all seeds germinate, which is unrealistic for heterogeneous forest seed lots. Long-term survival (cure fraction) models offer a framework to address this limitation. This study uses seed germination of native Brazilian forest species to demonstrate the applicability and advantages of long-term modelling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five independent datasets from native Brazilian forest species were analysed under varying environmental conditions, including temperature, osmotic stress, light and seed traits. Germination was modelled as a time-to-event process using parametric (log-normal, Weibull, log-logistic) and semiparametric (Cox) approaches with long-term survival models. Kaplan-Meier estimators were used for initial exploration and model comparison. Model selection was based on graphical fit and Cox-Snell residuals.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>All datasets showed a fraction of non-germinated seeds, with germination curves stabilizing below 100 %, which corroborates the use of cure models. Long-term models consistently outperformed traditional survival approaches, providing better fit and biological interpretability. Environmental factors differentially affected incidence and latency components: extreme temperatures and water stress significantly reduced the probability of germination, while having smaller effects on germination speed. The probability of germination varied widely between species and conditions, from 10 to 95 %. The models also revealed complex interactions between environmental and seed characteristics that influence germination dynamics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that long-term survival models provide a robust, biologically realistic statistical framework for analysing germination data from forest seeds. Partitioning the germination process into incidence (probability of germination) and latency (time to germination) components enabled key advances. First, it allowed precise quantification of the fractions of germinating and non-germinating seeds. Second, it provided more accurate and informative estimates than traditional survival methods. Finally, it enabled the isolation of the effects of environmental factors on germination capacity and speed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":"1277-1293"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13595234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcag175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Seed germination analysis often ignores temporal dynamics and non-germinating fractions, limiting biological inference. Conventional methods assume all seeds germinate, which is unrealistic for heterogeneous forest seed lots. Long-term survival (cure fraction) models offer a framework to address this limitation. This study uses seed germination of native Brazilian forest species to demonstrate the applicability and advantages of long-term modelling.

Methods: Five independent datasets from native Brazilian forest species were analysed under varying environmental conditions, including temperature, osmotic stress, light and seed traits. Germination was modelled as a time-to-event process using parametric (log-normal, Weibull, log-logistic) and semiparametric (Cox) approaches with long-term survival models. Kaplan-Meier estimators were used for initial exploration and model comparison. Model selection was based on graphical fit and Cox-Snell residuals.

Key results: All datasets showed a fraction of non-germinated seeds, with germination curves stabilizing below 100 %, which corroborates the use of cure models. Long-term models consistently outperformed traditional survival approaches, providing better fit and biological interpretability. Environmental factors differentially affected incidence and latency components: extreme temperatures and water stress significantly reduced the probability of germination, while having smaller effects on germination speed. The probability of germination varied widely between species and conditions, from 10 to 95 %. The models also revealed complex interactions between environmental and seed characteristics that influence germination dynamics.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that long-term survival models provide a robust, biologically realistic statistical framework for analysing germination data from forest seeds. Partitioning the germination process into incidence (probability of germination) and latency (time to germination) components enabled key advances. First, it allowed precise quantification of the fractions of germinating and non-germinating seeds. Second, it provided more accurate and informative estimates than traditional survival methods. Finally, it enabled the isolation of the effects of environmental factors on germination capacity and speed.

长期生存模型能改善种子萌发研究中的推断吗?来自热带森林物种的证据。
背景和目的:种子发芽分析常常忽略时间动态和非发芽部分,限制了生物学推断。传统的方法假设所有的种子都能发芽,这对于异质森林种子地来说是不现实的。长期生存(治愈率)模型为解决这一局限性提供了一个框架。本研究以巴西原生森林物种种子萌发为研究对象,验证了长期模型的适用性和优势。方法:在温度、渗透胁迫、光照和种子性状等不同环境条件下,对5个独立的巴西原生森林物种数据进行分析。采用参数(对数正态、威布尔、对数逻辑)和半参数(Cox)方法和长期生存模型,将发芽建模为时间到事件的过程。Kaplan-Meier估计用于初始探索和模型比较。模型选择基于图形拟合和Cox-Snell残差。关键结果:所有数据集都显示了一部分未发芽的种子,发芽曲线稳定在100%以下,这证实了cure模型的使用。长期模型始终优于传统的生存方法,提供更好的拟合和生物可解释性。环境因素对萌发率和潜伏期的影响存在差异:极端温度和水分胁迫显著降低了萌发率,而对萌发速度的影响较小。种子的发芽率在不同种类和条件下差别很大,从10%到95%不等。这些模型还揭示了影响发芽动力学的环境和种子特性之间复杂的相互作用。结论:本研究表明,长期生存模型为分析森林种子发芽数据提供了一个强大的、生物学上真实的统计框架。将发芽过程划分为发生率(发芽概率)和潜伏期(发芽时间)组件,使关键进展成为可能。首先,它可以精确地量化发芽和不发芽种子的比例。其次,它提供了比传统生存方法更准确和信息丰富的估计。最后,分离了环境因素对发芽量和发芽速度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书