Interplay of Left-Behind Status and Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) in Social Acceptance and Rejection Dynamics in Rural China

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Children & Society Pub Date : 2026-06-22 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI:10.1111/chso.70021
Mengkun Li, Dongbo Zhang
{"title":"Interplay of Left-Behind Status and Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) in Social Acceptance and Rejection Dynamics in Rural China","authors":"Mengkun Li,&nbsp;Dongbo Zhang","doi":"10.1111/chso.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study explores how left-behind status and special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) interact to shape peer acceptance and rejection among primary school children in rural China. While prior research has examined these groups separately, little is known about their intersection within peer dynamics. This study drew on sociometric data from 579 students across 17 classes in seven rural schools. It used the Social Inclusion Survey (SIS) to measure peer acceptance and rejection in both academic and play contexts. A two-way between-groups ANOVA revealed that children with SEND experienced lower peer acceptance and higher rejection than their non-SEND peers. In contrast, left-behind children showed higher acceptance and lower rejection than their non-left-behind classmates, challenging dominant deficit-based assumptions. Notably, left-behind children with SEND were more accepted than non-left-behind children with SEND, suggesting that left-behind status may buffer against some of the peer-related disadvantages associated with SEND. These findings emphasise that social identities do not consistently exacerbate disadvantage; rather, their impacts depend on context and interaction. The study argues against simplistic, risk-focused narratives and highlights the necessity of accounting for broader social and cultural dynamics in developing inclusive education policies and interventions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47660,"journal":{"name":"Children & Society","volume":"40 4","pages":"752-763"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/chso.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores how left-behind status and special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) interact to shape peer acceptance and rejection among primary school children in rural China. While prior research has examined these groups separately, little is known about their intersection within peer dynamics. This study drew on sociometric data from 579 students across 17 classes in seven rural schools. It used the Social Inclusion Survey (SIS) to measure peer acceptance and rejection in both academic and play contexts. A two-way between-groups ANOVA revealed that children with SEND experienced lower peer acceptance and higher rejection than their non-SEND peers. In contrast, left-behind children showed higher acceptance and lower rejection than their non-left-behind classmates, challenging dominant deficit-based assumptions. Notably, left-behind children with SEND were more accepted than non-left-behind children with SEND, suggesting that left-behind status may buffer against some of the peer-related disadvantages associated with SEND. These findings emphasise that social identities do not consistently exacerbate disadvantage; rather, their impacts depend on context and interaction. The study argues against simplistic, risk-focused narratives and highlights the necessity of accounting for broader social and cultural dynamics in developing inclusive education policies and interventions.

中国农村留守状况与特殊教育需要和残疾(SEND)在社会接受和排斥动态中的相互作用
本研究探讨了留守状况和特殊教育需求与残疾(SEND)如何相互作用,影响中国农村小学生对同伴的接受和排斥。虽然之前的研究已经分别研究了这些群体,但对他们在同伴动态中的交集知之甚少。这项研究利用了7所农村学校17个班级的579名学生的社会计量数据。它使用社会包容调查(SIS)来衡量同龄人在学术和游戏环境中的接受和拒绝。双向组间方差分析显示,SEND儿童比非SEND儿童有更低的同伴接受度和更高的排斥度。相比之下,留守儿童比非留守儿童表现出更高的接受度和更低的排斥度,挑战了主流的基于缺陷的假设。值得注意的是,患有SEND的留守儿童比患有SEND的非留守儿童更容易被接受,这表明留守状态可能会缓冲与SEND相关的一些与同龄人相关的不利因素。这些发现强调,社会身份并不总是加剧劣势;相反,它们的影响取决于环境和相互作用。该研究反对简单化、以风险为中心的叙述,并强调在制定包容性教育政策和干预措施时必须考虑更广泛的社会和文化动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Children & Society
Children & Society SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Children & Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high quality research and debate on all aspects of childhood and policies and services for children and young people. The journal is based in the United Kingdom, with an international range and scope. The journal informs all those who work with and for children, young people and their families by publishing innovative papers on research and practice across a broad spectrum of topics, including: theories of childhood; children"s everyday lives at home, school and in the community; children"s culture, rights and participation; children"s health and well-being; child protection, early prevention and intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书