Branching out: Resolving plant evolution through phylogenetic networks

IF 3.5 3区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Applications in Plant Sciences Pub Date : 2026-06-23 Epub Date: 2026-06-18 DOI:10.1002/aps3.70065
George P. Tiley, Claudia Solís-Lemus
{"title":"Branching out: Resolving plant evolution through phylogenetic networks","authors":"George P. Tiley,&nbsp;Claudia Solís-Lemus","doi":"10.1002/aps3.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The diversity of life is shaped by the interplay of multiple evolutionary processes. Some of these processes, like speciation, are well represented by a bifurcating tree. Others, like gene flow, hybridization, and introgression, are more appropriately described by networks. In plants, there are other common processes, such as polyploidy, reproductive mechanisms, and rapid shifts in life history characters, that can blur lineage boundaries and complicate evolutionary histories. As high-quality genomic data have become increasingly accessible, it has become evident that some of the most persistent challenges in resolving relationships in the plant tree of life do not arise from insufficient data, but from the need to model these reticulate processes explicitly.</p><p>To better detect patterns of reticulate evolution in plants and infer the mechanisms underlying those patterns, new method development and increased accessibility of bioinformatic tools that especially consider plant biology are needed. However, methodological progress has not kept pace with the increasing amounts of genomic data and its now routine application to basic research in plant evolutionary biology. Inferring phylogenetic networks remains considerably more difficult than estimating trees, both statistically and computationally. Models that accommodate reticulation must also account for other sources of discordance, such as incomplete lineage sorting, leading to a rapid increase in complexity even for modest datasets. Moreover, the evolution of a hybridizing complex or even a single species can involve multiple overlapping events, producing network structures that are challenging to estimate and interpret. Practical limitations, such as computational scalability to large numbers of taxa, sensitivity to noise and missing data, and limited incorporation of biologically relevant processes, further constrain current approaches. As a result, there remains a substantial methodological gap to detect the signatures of reticulate evolution in modern plant phylogenomic datasets.</p><p>This special issue presents a collection of papers that showcase the breadth of current work on phylogenetic networks and related approaches for studying reticulate evolution in plants. The contributions include new tools for network visualization (Schliep et al., <span>2026</span>), streamlined hybrid enrichment (Hyb-Seq) phylogenomic workflows (Liu et al., <span>2026</span>), haplotype assembly from long-read amplicon data (Fakoya et al., <span>2026</span>), detection of introgression from site-frequency patterns with machine learning (McKenzie and Eaton, <span>2026</span>), and statistical detection of ghost lineage introgression (Forsythe et al., <span>2026</span>). These methodological advances are complemented by empirical studies that creatively harness the information within genomic data: repurposing population genomic datasets to characterize plant-associated microbiomes (Gonzalez-Ramirez et al., <span>2026</span>), dissecting ancient hybridization and gene tree discordance across Asteraceae (Ellestad et al., <span>2026</span>), and developing Hyb-Seq-based DNA barcodes for timber identification from wood specimens (Bellot et al., <span>2026</span>), a historically challenging task yet critical to conservation biology.</p><p>Several contributions to this issue develop new methods to detect and characterize reticulate evolutionary history at different scales and levels of resolution. At the sequence level, Fakoya et al. (<span>2026</span>) introduce HapAsmbl, which reconstructs diploid haplotypes from multi-locus Nanopore amplicon data, enabling fine-grained studies of allelic diversity in polymorphic populations such as perennial ryegrass. Scaling up to broader phylogenetic comparisons, McKenzie and Eaton (<span>2026</span>) show how coalescent simulations with their program simcat can be used to train a neural network model to identify introgression signals from SNP frequency patterns across many quartet combinations simultaneously, extending the reach of invariant-based inference well beyond the traditional quartet analyses. Yet, even a well-supported introgression signal may be erroneous if its true source is an unsampled or extinct lineage. This challenge of missing lineages is addressed by Forsythe et al. (<span>2026</span>), who leverage branch length information to distinguish ghost lineage introgression from gene flow among sampled lineages in four-taxon tests. The new Python package ghostbuster (Forsythe et al., <span>2026</span>) should provide a reproducible approach to detecting ghost introgression, as demonstrated through reanalysis of previously identified introgression events in Brassicaceae.</p><p>In addition to analytical advances, the accurate representation of reticulate evolution depends on the infrastructure available to generate and communicate the underlying data. Liu et al. (<span>2026</span>) introduce HybSuite, which consolidates the major steps of hybrid-capture phylogenomics from raw read retrieval and preprocessing to assembly, paralog handling, and species tree inference into a single reproducible Bash-based workflow, lowering the practical barriers between sequencing data and biological interpretation. Once high-quality datasets are in hand and analytical methods have been run, communicating the resulting complex evolutionary relationships requires equally capable visualization tools. Schliep et al. (<span>2026</span>) meet this need with tanggle, an R package extending the ggtree (Yu et al., <span>2017</span>) and ggplot2 (Wickham, <span>2016</span>) frameworks to support flexible, publication-quality visualization of phylogenetic networks, including the integration of morphological and geographic data. Together, these contributions span the full arc from data generation to evolutionary inference, reflecting a field that is evolving both in its analytical modeling as well as the practical bioinformatics tools that are needed to reconstruct reticulate processes in the plant tree of life.</p><p>Beyond methodological development, the remaining contributions illustrate how phylogenomic approaches can reveal complex evolutionary and ecological patterns across diverse plant systems. Gonzalez-Ramirez et al. (<span>2026</span>) draw attention to an often overlooked feature of genomic datasets: the off-target reads that accumulate alongside intended sequence data. Using whole-genome sequencing from the liverwort <i>Calasterella californica</i> (Hampe ex Austin) D.G. Long and T.X. Zheng, they characterize associated bacterial communities and show that these vary geographically across California, with <i>Methylobacterium</i> and related taxa dominating and spatial patterns likely tied to precipitation and temperature seasonality. The study makes a broader point as well: population genomic datasets can be repurposed to investigate host-associated microbiomes, opening new windows into ecological interactions that would otherwise require separate sampling efforts.</p><p>Ellestad et al. (<span>2026</span>) confront a persistent challenge in plant systematics: pervasive phylogenetic discordance in Asteraceae, one of the most species-rich families of flowering plants. Integrating Hyb-Seq and transcriptomic data, they disentangle the contributions of hybridization, incomplete lineage sorting, and paralogy from ancient whole-genome duplication to gene tree discordance. The authors found evidence of ancient reticulation particularly among South American lineages alongside widespread but difficult-to-interpret signatures of whole-genome duplication. Recognizing that such analyses can be difficult to replicate, the authors pair their empirical results with a detailed tutorial designed to promote transparency and reproducibility in studies of complex evolutionary histories.</p><p>The question of how phylogenomic resources translate into real-world utility finds a concrete answer in the final contribution. Bellot et al. (<span>2026</span>) turn to herbarium specimens in the mahogany family (Meliaceae) to develop a workflow for identifying short, informative DNA barcodes suitable for timber identification. By screening hundreds of nuclear and plastid loci from Hyb-Seq and genome skimming data, they identify candidate regions that can be reliably amplified and sequenced from wood samples, achieving high rates of species-level identification. The result is both a practical tool for tracking and regulating the timber trade and a demonstration of how legacy herbarium collections, combined with modern genomic approaches, can be mobilized to address urgent conservation challenges.</p><p>The contributions in this issue show that reticulate evolution research is impactful and can help bring clarity to complex plant evolution. Continuing to build methodological infrastructure in this area is an ongoing goal, as much remains to be resolved. More work on the statistical modeling of overlapping evolutionary processes and the computational scalability of network-based inference with genomic data is needed, but the trajectory is clear: the study of reticulate evolution in plants is becoming at once more rigorous, more accessible, and more consequential, and the papers collected here reflect that momentum.</p><p>C.S.-L. wrote the first draft of the introduction, and G.P.T. and C.S.-L. edited the introduction and approved the final version. Both reviewed initial proposals and handled manuscripts contributed to this special issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":8022,"journal":{"name":"Applications in Plant Sciences","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aps3.70065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applications in Plant Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aps3.70065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diversity of life is shaped by the interplay of multiple evolutionary processes. Some of these processes, like speciation, are well represented by a bifurcating tree. Others, like gene flow, hybridization, and introgression, are more appropriately described by networks. In plants, there are other common processes, such as polyploidy, reproductive mechanisms, and rapid shifts in life history characters, that can blur lineage boundaries and complicate evolutionary histories. As high-quality genomic data have become increasingly accessible, it has become evident that some of the most persistent challenges in resolving relationships in the plant tree of life do not arise from insufficient data, but from the need to model these reticulate processes explicitly.

To better detect patterns of reticulate evolution in plants and infer the mechanisms underlying those patterns, new method development and increased accessibility of bioinformatic tools that especially consider plant biology are needed. However, methodological progress has not kept pace with the increasing amounts of genomic data and its now routine application to basic research in plant evolutionary biology. Inferring phylogenetic networks remains considerably more difficult than estimating trees, both statistically and computationally. Models that accommodate reticulation must also account for other sources of discordance, such as incomplete lineage sorting, leading to a rapid increase in complexity even for modest datasets. Moreover, the evolution of a hybridizing complex or even a single species can involve multiple overlapping events, producing network structures that are challenging to estimate and interpret. Practical limitations, such as computational scalability to large numbers of taxa, sensitivity to noise and missing data, and limited incorporation of biologically relevant processes, further constrain current approaches. As a result, there remains a substantial methodological gap to detect the signatures of reticulate evolution in modern plant phylogenomic datasets.

This special issue presents a collection of papers that showcase the breadth of current work on phylogenetic networks and related approaches for studying reticulate evolution in plants. The contributions include new tools for network visualization (Schliep et al., 2026), streamlined hybrid enrichment (Hyb-Seq) phylogenomic workflows (Liu et al., 2026), haplotype assembly from long-read amplicon data (Fakoya et al., 2026), detection of introgression from site-frequency patterns with machine learning (McKenzie and Eaton, 2026), and statistical detection of ghost lineage introgression (Forsythe et al., 2026). These methodological advances are complemented by empirical studies that creatively harness the information within genomic data: repurposing population genomic datasets to characterize plant-associated microbiomes (Gonzalez-Ramirez et al., 2026), dissecting ancient hybridization and gene tree discordance across Asteraceae (Ellestad et al., 2026), and developing Hyb-Seq-based DNA barcodes for timber identification from wood specimens (Bellot et al., 2026), a historically challenging task yet critical to conservation biology.

Several contributions to this issue develop new methods to detect and characterize reticulate evolutionary history at different scales and levels of resolution. At the sequence level, Fakoya et al. (2026) introduce HapAsmbl, which reconstructs diploid haplotypes from multi-locus Nanopore amplicon data, enabling fine-grained studies of allelic diversity in polymorphic populations such as perennial ryegrass. Scaling up to broader phylogenetic comparisons, McKenzie and Eaton (2026) show how coalescent simulations with their program simcat can be used to train a neural network model to identify introgression signals from SNP frequency patterns across many quartet combinations simultaneously, extending the reach of invariant-based inference well beyond the traditional quartet analyses. Yet, even a well-supported introgression signal may be erroneous if its true source is an unsampled or extinct lineage. This challenge of missing lineages is addressed by Forsythe et al. (2026), who leverage branch length information to distinguish ghost lineage introgression from gene flow among sampled lineages in four-taxon tests. The new Python package ghostbuster (Forsythe et al., 2026) should provide a reproducible approach to detecting ghost introgression, as demonstrated through reanalysis of previously identified introgression events in Brassicaceae.

In addition to analytical advances, the accurate representation of reticulate evolution depends on the infrastructure available to generate and communicate the underlying data. Liu et al. (2026) introduce HybSuite, which consolidates the major steps of hybrid-capture phylogenomics from raw read retrieval and preprocessing to assembly, paralog handling, and species tree inference into a single reproducible Bash-based workflow, lowering the practical barriers between sequencing data and biological interpretation. Once high-quality datasets are in hand and analytical methods have been run, communicating the resulting complex evolutionary relationships requires equally capable visualization tools. Schliep et al. (2026) meet this need with tanggle, an R package extending the ggtree (Yu et al., 2017) and ggplot2 (Wickham, 2016) frameworks to support flexible, publication-quality visualization of phylogenetic networks, including the integration of morphological and geographic data. Together, these contributions span the full arc from data generation to evolutionary inference, reflecting a field that is evolving both in its analytical modeling as well as the practical bioinformatics tools that are needed to reconstruct reticulate processes in the plant tree of life.

Beyond methodological development, the remaining contributions illustrate how phylogenomic approaches can reveal complex evolutionary and ecological patterns across diverse plant systems. Gonzalez-Ramirez et al. (2026) draw attention to an often overlooked feature of genomic datasets: the off-target reads that accumulate alongside intended sequence data. Using whole-genome sequencing from the liverwort Calasterella californica (Hampe ex Austin) D.G. Long and T.X. Zheng, they characterize associated bacterial communities and show that these vary geographically across California, with Methylobacterium and related taxa dominating and spatial patterns likely tied to precipitation and temperature seasonality. The study makes a broader point as well: population genomic datasets can be repurposed to investigate host-associated microbiomes, opening new windows into ecological interactions that would otherwise require separate sampling efforts.

Ellestad et al. (2026) confront a persistent challenge in plant systematics: pervasive phylogenetic discordance in Asteraceae, one of the most species-rich families of flowering plants. Integrating Hyb-Seq and transcriptomic data, they disentangle the contributions of hybridization, incomplete lineage sorting, and paralogy from ancient whole-genome duplication to gene tree discordance. The authors found evidence of ancient reticulation particularly among South American lineages alongside widespread but difficult-to-interpret signatures of whole-genome duplication. Recognizing that such analyses can be difficult to replicate, the authors pair their empirical results with a detailed tutorial designed to promote transparency and reproducibility in studies of complex evolutionary histories.

The question of how phylogenomic resources translate into real-world utility finds a concrete answer in the final contribution. Bellot et al. (2026) turn to herbarium specimens in the mahogany family (Meliaceae) to develop a workflow for identifying short, informative DNA barcodes suitable for timber identification. By screening hundreds of nuclear and plastid loci from Hyb-Seq and genome skimming data, they identify candidate regions that can be reliably amplified and sequenced from wood samples, achieving high rates of species-level identification. The result is both a practical tool for tracking and regulating the timber trade and a demonstration of how legacy herbarium collections, combined with modern genomic approaches, can be mobilized to address urgent conservation challenges.

The contributions in this issue show that reticulate evolution research is impactful and can help bring clarity to complex plant evolution. Continuing to build methodological infrastructure in this area is an ongoing goal, as much remains to be resolved. More work on the statistical modeling of overlapping evolutionary processes and the computational scalability of network-based inference with genomic data is needed, but the trajectory is clear: the study of reticulate evolution in plants is becoming at once more rigorous, more accessible, and more consequential, and the papers collected here reflect that momentum.

C.S.-L. wrote the first draft of the introduction, and G.P.T. and C.S.-L. edited the introduction and approved the final version. Both reviewed initial proposals and handled manuscripts contributed to this special issue.

分支:通过系统发育网络解决植物进化
生命的多样性是由多种进化过程的相互作用形成的。其中一些过程,如物种形成,可以很好地用分岔树来表示。其他的,如基因流动、杂交和基因渗入,则更适合用网络来描述。在植物中,还有其他共同的过程,如多倍体、生殖机制和生活史特征的快速变化,这些过程可能模糊谱系界限并使进化史复杂化。随着高质量的基因组数据越来越容易获得,很明显,解决植物生命之树关系的一些最持久的挑战不是来自数据不足,而是来自明确建模这些网状过程的需要。为了更好地检测植物网状进化的模式并推断这些模式背后的机制,需要开发新的方法和增加生物信息学工具的可及性,特别是考虑植物生物学。然而,方法的进步并没有跟上基因组数据量的增长及其在植物进化生物学基础研究中的常规应用。在统计和计算上,推断系统发育网络仍然比估计树要困难得多。适应网状结构的模型还必须考虑到其他不一致的来源,例如不完整的谱系排序,即使对于适度的数据集,也会导致复杂性的迅速增加。此外,杂交复合体甚至单个物种的进化可能涉及多个重叠事件,产生难以估计和解释的网络结构。实际的限制,如对大量分类群的计算可扩展性,对噪声和缺失数据的敏感性,以及生物相关过程的有限结合,进一步限制了当前的方法。因此,在现代植物系统基因组数据集中检测网状进化的特征仍然存在实质性的方法差距。本期特刊介绍了一系列论文,这些论文展示了当前系统发育网络和研究植物网状进化的相关方法的广度。贡献包括用于网络可视化的新工具(Schliep等人,2026)、流线杂交富集(Hyb-Seq)系统基因组工作流程(Liu等人,2026)、来自长读扩增子数据的单倍型组装(Fakoya等人,2026)、使用机器学习从位点频率模式检测渗入(McKenzie和Eaton, 2026)以及统计检测ghost lineage渗入(Forsythe等人,2026)。这些方法上的进步是由创造性地利用基因组数据中的信息的实证研究补充的:重新利用群体基因组数据集来表征与植物相关的微生物组(Gonzalez-Ramirez等人,2026),解剖跨Asteraceae的古代杂交和基因树不一致性(Ellestad等人,2026),以及开发基于hyb - seq的DNA条形码,用于木材标本的木材鉴定(Bellot等人,2026),这是一项具有历史挑战性的任务,但对保护生物学至关重要。在这一问题上的一些贡献发展了在不同尺度和分辨率水平上检测和表征网状进化史的新方法。在序列水平上,Fakoya等人(2026)引入了HapAsmbl,它从多位点纳米孔扩增子数据中重建二倍体单倍型,从而可以对多年生黑麦草等多态种群的等位基因多样性进行细致的研究。扩大到更广泛的系统发育比较,McKenzie和Eaton(2026)展示了如何使用他们的程序simcat进行聚结模拟,以训练神经网络模型,以同时识别跨许多四重奏组合的SNP频率模式的渗入信号,将基于不变量的推断的范围远远超出传统的四重奏分析。然而,即使是一个得到充分支持的基因渗入信号,如果它的真正来源是一个未采样或已灭绝的谱系,也可能是错误的。Forsythe等人(2026)解决了这一缺失谱系的挑战,他们利用分支长度信息在四个分类单元测试的样本谱系中区分幽灵谱系渗入和基因流动。新的Python包ghostbuster (Forsythe et al., 2026)应该提供一种可重复的方法来检测幽灵渗入,正如通过重新分析先前确定的十字花科渗入事件所证明的那样。除了分析方面的进步外,网状进化的准确表示还取决于可用于生成和交流底层数据的基础设施。Liu等人。 (2026)引入HybSuite,它将混合捕获系统基因组学的主要步骤从原始读取检索和预处理到组装,平行处理和物种树推断整合到一个可重复的基于bash的工作流程中,降低了测序数据和生物解释之间的实际障碍。一旦掌握了高质量的数据集,并且运行了分析方法,那么传达由此产生的复杂进化关系就需要同样强大的可视化工具。Schliep等人(2026)使用tangle满足了这一需求,这是一个扩展ggtree (Yu等人,2017)和ggplot2 (Wickham, 2016)框架的R包,以支持灵活的、出版质量的系统发育网络可视化,包括形态和地理数据的集成。总之,这些贡献跨越了从数据生成到进化推理的整个弧形,反映了一个领域在其分析建模以及重建植物生命树网状过程所需的实用生物信息学工具方面都在不断发展。除了方法论的发展之外,其余的贡献说明了系统基因组学方法如何揭示不同植物系统中复杂的进化和生态模式。Gonzalez-Ramirez等人(2026)提请注意基因组数据集经常被忽视的特征:与预期序列数据一起积累的脱靶读取。利用加利福尼亚Calasterella Calasterella (Hampe ex Austin) D.G. Long和T.X. Zheng的全基因组测序,他们描述了相关细菌群落的特征,并表明这些细菌群落在加利福尼亚的地理位置上存在差异,甲基细菌和相关分类群占主导地位,空间格局可能与降水和温度季节性有关。这项研究还提出了一个更广泛的观点:种群基因组数据集可以重新用于研究宿主相关的微生物组,为研究生态相互作用打开了新的窗口,否则就需要单独的采样工作。Ellestad等人(2026)在植物系统学中面临一个持续的挑战:菊科(开花植物中物种最丰富的科之一)普遍存在系统发育不一致性。整合Hyb-Seq和转录组学数据,他们解开了杂交、不完整谱系分类和从古代全基因组复制到基因树不一致的相似性的贡献。作者发现了古代网状结构的证据,特别是在南美洲的血统中,以及广泛但难以解释的全基因组复制特征。认识到这样的分析很难复制,作者将他们的经验结果与详细的教程相结合,旨在提高复杂进化史研究的透明度和可重复性。系统基因组资源如何转化为现实世界的效用的问题在最后的贡献中找到了具体的答案。Bellot等人(2026)转向红木科(Meliaceae)的植物标本馆标本,开发了一种适合木材识别的短而信息丰富的DNA条形码的工作流程。通过筛选来自Hyb-Seq和基因组浏览数据的数百个核和质体位点,他们确定了候选区域,这些区域可以可靠地从木材样本中扩增和测序,从而实现了物种水平的高鉴定率。其结果既是跟踪和管理木材贸易的实用工具,也是如何利用传统植物标本馆藏品与现代基因组方法相结合来应对紧迫的保护挑战的示范。这一期的文章表明网状进化研究是有影响力的,可以帮助厘清复杂植物的进化。继续在这一领域建立方法论基础设施是一个持续的目标,因为还有许多问题有待解决。在重叠进化过程的统计建模和基于基因组数据的网络推理的计算可扩展性方面还需要更多的工作,但轨迹是明确的:植物网状进化的研究正变得更加严格,更容易获得,更重要,这里收集的论文反映了这种势头。写了引言的初稿,还有G.P.T.和c.s.l。编辑导言,审定定稿。两人都审查了最初的建议,并处理了为本期特刊贡献的手稿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Applications in Plant Sciences (APPS) is a monthly, peer-reviewed, open access journal promoting the rapid dissemination of newly developed, innovative tools and protocols in all areas of the plant sciences, including genetics, structure, function, development, evolution, systematics, and ecology. Given the rapid progress today in technology and its application in the plant sciences, the goal of APPS is to foster communication within the plant science community to advance scientific research. APPS is a publication of the Botanical Society of America, originating in 2009 as the American Journal of Botany''s online-only section, AJB Primer Notes & Protocols in the Plant Sciences. APPS publishes the following types of articles: (1) Protocol Notes describe new methods and technological advancements; (2) Genomic Resources Articles characterize the development and demonstrate the usefulness of newly developed genomic resources, including transcriptomes; (3) Software Notes detail new software applications; (4) Application Articles illustrate the application of a new protocol, method, or software application within the context of a larger study; (5) Review Articles evaluate available techniques, methods, or protocols; (6) Primer Notes report novel genetic markers with evidence of wide applicability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书