Detecting cryptic ghost lineage introgression in four-taxon genomic datasets

IF 3.5 3区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Applications in Plant Sciences Pub Date : 2026-06-23 Epub Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1002/aps3.70045
Evan S. Forsythe, Blaine S. Pappa, Darren A. Clavette, Devin Y. Mendoza
{"title":"Detecting cryptic ghost lineage introgression in four-taxon genomic datasets","authors":"Evan S. Forsythe,&nbsp;Blaine S. Pappa,&nbsp;Darren A. Clavette,&nbsp;Devin Y. Mendoza","doi":"10.1002/aps3.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>Hybridization and introgression are pervasive evolutionary forces that have played fundamental roles in shaping the diversity of wild and domesticated plants. Four-taxon tests for introgression provide a reliable framework for detecting signatures of ancient introgression from genomic data, which have played an important role in revealing the reticulate nature of plant evolution; however, there is emerging evidence that a cryptic process known as ghost lineage introgression has the potential to dramatically skew interpretations of four-taxon introgression statistics, particularly our ability to determine the lineages involved in introgression. This ambiguity limits our ability to resolve the mechanisms and functional implications of introgression because it means we can determine neither the donor nor the recipient of introgressed alleles with confidence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Here, we develop ghostbuster, a statistical test designed to detect ghost lineage introgression in genomic data based on patterns of sequence divergence. We employ coalescent simulations to test our method and ascertain the conditions under which it accurately identifies ingroup versus ghost lineage introgression. Finally, to demonstrate the utility of ghostbuster, we apply it to a previously identified introgression event in the plant family Brassicaceae.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our simulations reveal that ghostbuster accurately distinguishes ghost lineage introgression from ingroup introgression across a range of introgression scenarios, with errors arising only when divergence events are closely spaced or when ancestral population sizes are unbalanced. Our analysis of empirical plant data reveals that the previously identified introgression likely constitutes ghost lineage introgression and, thus, was previously misinterpreted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Our analyses of simulated and empirical data demonstrate that ghostbuster will be a helpful tool in resolving reticulate evolution in plants and other taxa. We demonstrate the biological insights that ghostbuster provides by presenting an updated model of ghost lineage introgression in Brassicaceae, impacting our understanding of the molecular evolution of crop and model species in this important plant lineage. Ghostbuster code is freely available at: https://github.com/EvanForsythe/Ghost_introgression.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8022,"journal":{"name":"Applications in Plant Sciences","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aps3.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applications in Plant Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aps3.70045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise

Hybridization and introgression are pervasive evolutionary forces that have played fundamental roles in shaping the diversity of wild and domesticated plants. Four-taxon tests for introgression provide a reliable framework for detecting signatures of ancient introgression from genomic data, which have played an important role in revealing the reticulate nature of plant evolution; however, there is emerging evidence that a cryptic process known as ghost lineage introgression has the potential to dramatically skew interpretations of four-taxon introgression statistics, particularly our ability to determine the lineages involved in introgression. This ambiguity limits our ability to resolve the mechanisms and functional implications of introgression because it means we can determine neither the donor nor the recipient of introgressed alleles with confidence.

Methods

Here, we develop ghostbuster, a statistical test designed to detect ghost lineage introgression in genomic data based on patterns of sequence divergence. We employ coalescent simulations to test our method and ascertain the conditions under which it accurately identifies ingroup versus ghost lineage introgression. Finally, to demonstrate the utility of ghostbuster, we apply it to a previously identified introgression event in the plant family Brassicaceae.

Results

Our simulations reveal that ghostbuster accurately distinguishes ghost lineage introgression from ingroup introgression across a range of introgression scenarios, with errors arising only when divergence events are closely spaced or when ancestral population sizes are unbalanced. Our analysis of empirical plant data reveals that the previously identified introgression likely constitutes ghost lineage introgression and, thus, was previously misinterpreted.

Discussion

Our analyses of simulated and empirical data demonstrate that ghostbuster will be a helpful tool in resolving reticulate evolution in plants and other taxa. We demonstrate the biological insights that ghostbuster provides by presenting an updated model of ghost lineage introgression in Brassicaceae, impacting our understanding of the molecular evolution of crop and model species in this important plant lineage. Ghostbuster code is freely available at: https://github.com/EvanForsythe/Ghost_introgression.

Abstract Image

在四分类单元基因组数据集中检测隐鬼谱系渗入
杂交和渐渗是普遍存在的进化力量,在形成野生和驯化植物的多样性方面发挥了重要作用。四类群基因渗入测试为从基因组数据中检测古代基因渗入特征提供了可靠的框架,这在揭示植物进化的网状特性方面发挥了重要作用;然而,越来越多的证据表明,一个被称为幽灵谱系渗入的神秘过程有可能极大地扭曲对四分类单元渗入统计数据的解释,特别是我们确定涉及渗入的谱系的能力。这种模糊性限制了我们解决基因渗入机制和功能影响的能力,因为这意味着我们既不能确定基因渗入等位基因的供体也不能确定其受体。方法在此,我们开发了ghostbuster,这是一个基于序列发散模式的统计测试,旨在检测基因组数据中的幽灵谱系渗入。我们采用聚结模拟来测试我们的方法,并确定在何种条件下,它能准确地识别群体内与幽灵谱系渗入。最后,为了证明ghostbuster的实用性,我们将其应用于之前确定的十字花科植物家族的渗入事件。我们的模拟表明,ghostbuster在一系列的遗传渗入场景中准确地区分了鬼系遗传渗入和群体内遗传渗入,只有当分化事件间隔很近或祖先种群规模不平衡时才会出现错误。我们对经验植物数据的分析表明,以前鉴定的基因渗入可能构成幽灵谱系渗入,因此,以前被误解了。我们对模拟数据和经验数据的分析表明,ghostbuster将是解决植物和其他分类群网状进化的有用工具。我们通过提出一个更新的芸苔科鬼系渗入模型,展示了鬼buster提供的生物学见解,影响了我们对这一重要植物谱系中作物和模式物种分子进化的理解。捉鬼敢死队代码可在https://github.com/EvanForsythe/Ghost_introgression免费获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Applications in Plant Sciences (APPS) is a monthly, peer-reviewed, open access journal promoting the rapid dissemination of newly developed, innovative tools and protocols in all areas of the plant sciences, including genetics, structure, function, development, evolution, systematics, and ecology. Given the rapid progress today in technology and its application in the plant sciences, the goal of APPS is to foster communication within the plant science community to advance scientific research. APPS is a publication of the Botanical Society of America, originating in 2009 as the American Journal of Botany''s online-only section, AJB Primer Notes & Protocols in the Plant Sciences. APPS publishes the following types of articles: (1) Protocol Notes describe new methods and technological advancements; (2) Genomic Resources Articles characterize the development and demonstrate the usefulness of newly developed genomic resources, including transcriptomes; (3) Software Notes detail new software applications; (4) Application Articles illustrate the application of a new protocol, method, or software application within the context of a larger study; (5) Review Articles evaluate available techniques, methods, or protocols; (6) Primer Notes report novel genetic markers with evidence of wide applicability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书