Stressing Equality or Embracing Diversity? How Teen Activists Navigate Societal Beliefs About Youth Activism

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Children & Society Pub Date : 2026-06-22 Epub Date: 2026-02-10 DOI:10.1111/chso.70028
Markéta Supa, Martin Nekola, Karolína Šimková, Lydie Karníková
{"title":"Stressing Equality or Embracing Diversity? How Teen Activists Navigate Societal Beliefs About Youth Activism","authors":"Markéta Supa,&nbsp;Martin Nekola,&nbsp;Karolína Šimková,&nbsp;Lydie Karníková","doi":"10.1111/chso.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Civically and politically participating children and teens encounter contrasting societal beliefs about their identities and actions. Some portray them as heroes, others as naive or rebellious; some celebrate their efforts, while others dismiss or diminish them. This study explores how teen activists experience, respond to and challenge these beliefs that shape their participation and everyday lives. A <i>Q</i> methodology study was conducted with twenty civically and politically engaged teens (aged 13–18) in Czechia. Participants sorted and reflected upon statements representing prevailing societal views on youth activism. The analysis revealed shared experiences of how societal beliefs about youth activism were lived and felt, yet distinct strategies for navigating the unequal adult-child power relations that operated as symbolic barriers within them. One group expressed <i>a critical and egalitarian attitude</i>, persistently questioning how adult discourses and stereotypes restrict youth participation and demanding recognition of young people as equally capable civic actors. The other group, reflecting <i>a moderate and diversity attitude</i>, accommodated societal beliefs about age-related differences while emphasising that young citizens' role in democracy is distinct but no less valuable than that of adults. Together, the findings show how the teen activists negotiated ingrained societal beliefs about youth activism, often alone or with only peer support, while turning these constraints into acts of redefinition and resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47660,"journal":{"name":"Children & Society","volume":"40 4","pages":"812-822"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/chso.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/chso.70028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Civically and politically participating children and teens encounter contrasting societal beliefs about their identities and actions. Some portray them as heroes, others as naive or rebellious; some celebrate their efforts, while others dismiss or diminish them. This study explores how teen activists experience, respond to and challenge these beliefs that shape their participation and everyday lives. A Q methodology study was conducted with twenty civically and politically engaged teens (aged 13–18) in Czechia. Participants sorted and reflected upon statements representing prevailing societal views on youth activism. The analysis revealed shared experiences of how societal beliefs about youth activism were lived and felt, yet distinct strategies for navigating the unequal adult-child power relations that operated as symbolic barriers within them. One group expressed a critical and egalitarian attitude, persistently questioning how adult discourses and stereotypes restrict youth participation and demanding recognition of young people as equally capable civic actors. The other group, reflecting a moderate and diversity attitude, accommodated societal beliefs about age-related differences while emphasising that young citizens' role in democracy is distinct but no less valuable than that of adults. Together, the findings show how the teen activists negotiated ingrained societal beliefs about youth activism, often alone or with only peer support, while turning these constraints into acts of redefinition and resistance.

Abstract Image

强调平等还是拥抱多样性?青少年活动分子如何驾驭社会对青年活动的看法
参与公民和政治活动的儿童和青少年遇到了关于他们身份和行为的截然不同的社会信仰。有些人把他们描绘成英雄,有些人把他们描绘成天真或叛逆的人;一些人赞扬他们的努力,而另一些人则对他们不屑一顾或贬低他们。本研究探讨了青少年积极分子如何体验、回应和挑战这些影响他们参与和日常生活的信念。一项Q方法研究在捷克对20名参与公民和政治活动的青少年(13-18岁)进行。与会者对代表社会对青年行动主义主流观点的发言进行整理和反思。分析揭示了关于青年行动主义的社会信念是如何生活和感受的共同经历,以及在不平等的成人-儿童权力关系中作为象征性障碍运作的不同策略。一组人表达了批判和平等的态度,不断质疑成人的话语和陈规定型观念如何限制青年的参与,并要求承认青年是同样有能力的公民行动者。另一组,反映了一种温和和多元化的态度,包容了与年龄有关的差异的社会观念,同时强调年轻公民在民主中的作用是独特的,但并不亚于成年人的价值。总之,研究结果表明,青少年活动家如何与根深蒂固的社会观念进行谈判,通常是独自一人或只有同伴的支持,同时将这些限制转化为重新定义和抵抗的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Children & Society
Children & Society SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Children & Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high quality research and debate on all aspects of childhood and policies and services for children and young people. The journal is based in the United Kingdom, with an international range and scope. The journal informs all those who work with and for children, young people and their families by publishing innovative papers on research and practice across a broad spectrum of topics, including: theories of childhood; children"s everyday lives at home, school and in the community; children"s culture, rights and participation; children"s health and well-being; child protection, early prevention and intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书