Comparative study of surface modification strategies for interfacial regulation of poly(L-lactic acid)/graphene oxide-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds

IF 2.9 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Hexu Qi, Qinglin He, Yunfeng Guo, Xin Sun, Zhihe Zhao
{"title":"Comparative study of surface modification strategies for interfacial regulation of poly(L-lactic acid)/graphene oxide-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds","authors":"Hexu Qi,&nbsp;Qinglin He,&nbsp;Yunfeng Guo,&nbsp;Xin Sun,&nbsp;Zhihe Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s00396-026-05627-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Achieving simultaneous mechanical robustness and cytocompatibility in polymer-based scaffolds requires precise interfacial regulation at the nanoscale. Herein, graphene oxide-hydroxyapatite (GO-HA) nanohybrids were engineered via three distinct surface modification strategies—tannic acid (TA) adsorption, polydopamine (PDA) deposition, and poly(D-lactide) (PDLA) grafting—to elucidate how interfacial chemistry governs structural evolution and composite performance in Poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) matrices. While all modifications preserved hydroxyapatite crystallinity, they induced differentiated interphase architectures: TA introduced molecular-level surface functionalization with minimal aggregation, PDA formed a conformal interphase layer, and PDLA generated polymer-rich encapsulated structures with enlarged dispersion units. Thermal analysis revealed that PDLA grafting maximized crystallinity and thermal stability due to molecular compatibility with PLLA. However, mechanical evaluation demonstrated that GO-HA-TA achieved superior reinforcement, highlighting the importance of balancing interfacial adhesion with polymer chain mobility. Excessive interphase thickening, despite enhancing crystallization, may constrain deformation adaptability. Furthermore, TA-modified scaffolds exhibited improved wettability and uniform surface morphology. Cytocompatibility assays confirmed high cell viability and negligible cytotoxicity across all groups. This study establishes that optimizing cytocompatible composite scaffolds requires not merely maximizing interfacial compatibility, but strategically balancing adhesion and structural discreteness, identifying surface modification strategies as the most effective route for high-performance PLLA/GO-HA scaffolds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":520,"journal":{"name":"Colloid and Polymer Science","volume":"304 7","pages":"1779 - 1797"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloid and Polymer Science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00396-026-05627-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving simultaneous mechanical robustness and cytocompatibility in polymer-based scaffolds requires precise interfacial regulation at the nanoscale. Herein, graphene oxide-hydroxyapatite (GO-HA) nanohybrids were engineered via three distinct surface modification strategies—tannic acid (TA) adsorption, polydopamine (PDA) deposition, and poly(D-lactide) (PDLA) grafting—to elucidate how interfacial chemistry governs structural evolution and composite performance in Poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) matrices. While all modifications preserved hydroxyapatite crystallinity, they induced differentiated interphase architectures: TA introduced molecular-level surface functionalization with minimal aggregation, PDA formed a conformal interphase layer, and PDLA generated polymer-rich encapsulated structures with enlarged dispersion units. Thermal analysis revealed that PDLA grafting maximized crystallinity and thermal stability due to molecular compatibility with PLLA. However, mechanical evaluation demonstrated that GO-HA-TA achieved superior reinforcement, highlighting the importance of balancing interfacial adhesion with polymer chain mobility. Excessive interphase thickening, despite enhancing crystallization, may constrain deformation adaptability. Furthermore, TA-modified scaffolds exhibited improved wettability and uniform surface morphology. Cytocompatibility assays confirmed high cell viability and negligible cytotoxicity across all groups. This study establishes that optimizing cytocompatible composite scaffolds requires not merely maximizing interfacial compatibility, but strategically balancing adhesion and structural discreteness, identifying surface modification strategies as the most effective route for high-performance PLLA/GO-HA scaffolds.

Abstract Image

聚l -乳酸/氧化石墨烯-羟基磷灰石复合支架界面调节表面修饰策略的比较研究
在聚合物基支架中实现同时的机械稳健性和细胞相容性需要在纳米尺度上精确的界面调节。本文通过三种不同的表面修饰策略——单宁酸(TA)吸附、聚多巴胺(PDA)沉积和聚d -乳酸(PDLA)接枝——来设计氧化石墨烯-羟基磷灰石(GO-HA)纳米杂化物,以阐明界面化学如何影响聚l -乳酸(PLLA)基质的结构演变和复合性能。虽然所有的修饰都保留了羟基磷灰石的结晶度,但它们诱导了分化的间相结构:TA以最小的聚集引入了分子水平的表面功能化,PDA形成了保形的间相层,PDLA产生了具有扩大分散单元的富含聚合物的包封结构。热分析表明,由于与PLLA的分子相容性,接枝PDLA的结晶度和热稳定性得到了最大化。然而,力学评价表明,GO-HA-TA获得了更好的增强效果,强调了平衡界面粘附性和聚合物链迁移率的重要性。过度的间相增厚,尽管增强了结晶,但可能限制变形适应性。此外,ta修饰的支架具有更好的润湿性和均匀的表面形貌。细胞相容性测定证实所有组的细胞活力高,细胞毒性可忽略不计。本研究表明,优化细胞相容性复合材料支架不仅需要最大限度地提高界面相容性,还需要有策略地平衡粘附性和结构离散性,确定表面修饰策略是高性能PLLA/GO-HA支架最有效的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Colloid and Polymer Science
Colloid and Polymer Science 化学-高分子科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Colloid and Polymer Science - a leading international journal of longstanding tradition - is devoted to colloid and polymer science and its interdisciplinary interactions. As such, it responds to a demand which has lost none of its actuality as revealed in the trends of contemporary materials science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书