Speciation History Shapes Patterns of Assemblage Species Richness in Birds

IF 7.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2026-06-22 DOI:10.1111/ele.70432
Bouwe R. Reijenga, Rampal S. Etienne, David J. Murrell, Alex L. Pigot
{"title":"Speciation History Shapes Patterns of Assemblage Species Richness in Birds","authors":"Bouwe R. Reijenga,&nbsp;Rampal S. Etienne,&nbsp;David J. Murrell,&nbsp;Alex L. Pigot","doi":"10.1111/ele.70432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Speciation is the ultimate source of biodiversity, yet because most species arise in spatial isolation (allopatry), it remains unclear how speciation history shapes patterns of sympatric species richness. Here, we examine how the timing of past speciation events influences the maximum sympatric species richness attained across 40 families of passerine birds. Using a phylogenetic model, we infer that the average waiting time for species to assemble in sympatry is remarkably long (~8 million years), occurring over macroevolutionary timescales comparable to the pace of speciation itself. Consequently, we find that the proportion of species in sympatry varies substantially across families, peaking in ancient or small clades comprised of older species, while remaining low in large, rapidly diversifying clades. Our analysis shows that macroevolutionary delays in colonisation are sufficient for speciation history to leave an indelible legacy on present-day assemblages, challenging the view that richness is strictly limited by contemporary environmental capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"29 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70432","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70432","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Speciation is the ultimate source of biodiversity, yet because most species arise in spatial isolation (allopatry), it remains unclear how speciation history shapes patterns of sympatric species richness. Here, we examine how the timing of past speciation events influences the maximum sympatric species richness attained across 40 families of passerine birds. Using a phylogenetic model, we infer that the average waiting time for species to assemble in sympatry is remarkably long (~8 million years), occurring over macroevolutionary timescales comparable to the pace of speciation itself. Consequently, we find that the proportion of species in sympatry varies substantially across families, peaking in ancient or small clades comprised of older species, while remaining low in large, rapidly diversifying clades. Our analysis shows that macroevolutionary delays in colonisation are sufficient for speciation history to leave an indelible legacy on present-day assemblages, challenging the view that richness is strictly limited by contemporary environmental capacity.

Abstract Image

鸟类物种形成历史决定了组合物种丰富度的格局
物种形成是生物多样性的最终来源,但由于大多数物种都是在空间隔离中出现的,物种形成历史如何塑造同域物种丰富度的模式尚不清楚。在这里,我们研究了过去物种形成事件的时间如何影响40个雀形目鸟类科的最大同域物种丰富度。使用系统发育模型,我们推断物种聚集在一起的平均等待时间非常长(约800万年),发生在与物种形成本身的速度相当的宏观进化时间尺度上。因此,我们发现同属植物的物种比例在不同的科中变化很大,在由老物种组成的古老或小型分支中达到峰值,而在快速多样化的大型分支中保持较低的比例。我们的分析表明,殖民化的宏观进化延迟足以使物种形成历史在当今的组合中留下不可磨灭的遗产,挑战了丰富程度严格受当代环境容量限制的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书