Charlotte M. Probst, Jacob S. Berv, Zhizhuo Zhou, Mingyu Zhang, Tiffany Dias, Karen Alofs, David F. Fouhey, Brian C. Weeks
{"title":"Temperature Predicts Relative Mass but Not Size in Passerines","authors":"Charlotte M. Probst, Jacob S. Berv, Zhizhuo Zhou, Mingyu Zhang, Tiffany Dias, Karen Alofs, David F. Fouhey, Brian C. Weeks","doi":"10.1111/geb.70272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Predictable relationships between temperature and animal size and shape are the basis for classic rules in macroecology. Body size is thought to covary negatively with temperature (Bergmann's Rule), broadly attributed to thermoregulatory demand for larger size in colder climates. However, ecophysiological principles suggest that changes in insulative materials may be a more effective thermoregulatory adaptation than changes in overall skeletal size. We test for global gradients in mass relative to skeletal size (a proxy for insulation) and body size.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Current.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Aves: Passeriformes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Combining a dataset of mass and skeletal traits for 1958 passerine species, we use Bayesian phylogenetic comparative analyses to test the extent to which temperature predicts skeletal size and relative mass.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Across species, we find no evidence that temperature predicts skeletal size; rather, the effects associated with phylogeny account for nearly all of the variation in size. In contrast, we find a global gradient in mass relative to skeletal size, with species in colder climates having more mass than expected given their skeletal size. For 24 species, we assess these relationships within species and find that relative mass has declined through time but is not predicted by temperature.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Mass relative to skeletal size is expected to exert a significant effect on insulation and energy stores, and we find it is more labile than skeletal size across species. Our results suggest: (1) species in colder climates tend to have greater insulation (as indicated by their higher relative mass); (2) skeletal size in passerines does not strongly adhere to Bergmann's Rule, suggesting spatial temperature-size relationships may be unlikely to predict temporal responses of size to climate change in this group; and (3) declines in relative mass may be a widespread cryptic response to global change.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"35 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70272","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70272","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
Predictable relationships between temperature and animal size and shape are the basis for classic rules in macroecology. Body size is thought to covary negatively with temperature (Bergmann's Rule), broadly attributed to thermoregulatory demand for larger size in colder climates. However, ecophysiological principles suggest that changes in insulative materials may be a more effective thermoregulatory adaptation than changes in overall skeletal size. We test for global gradients in mass relative to skeletal size (a proxy for insulation) and body size.
Location
Global.
Time Period
Current.
Major Taxa Studied
Aves: Passeriformes.
Methods
Combining a dataset of mass and skeletal traits for 1958 passerine species, we use Bayesian phylogenetic comparative analyses to test the extent to which temperature predicts skeletal size and relative mass.
Results
Across species, we find no evidence that temperature predicts skeletal size; rather, the effects associated with phylogeny account for nearly all of the variation in size. In contrast, we find a global gradient in mass relative to skeletal size, with species in colder climates having more mass than expected given their skeletal size. For 24 species, we assess these relationships within species and find that relative mass has declined through time but is not predicted by temperature.
Main Conclusions
Mass relative to skeletal size is expected to exert a significant effect on insulation and energy stores, and we find it is more labile than skeletal size across species. Our results suggest: (1) species in colder climates tend to have greater insulation (as indicated by their higher relative mass); (2) skeletal size in passerines does not strongly adhere to Bergmann's Rule, suggesting spatial temperature-size relationships may be unlikely to predict temporal responses of size to climate change in this group; and (3) declines in relative mass may be a widespread cryptic response to global change.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.