Water cooling to prevent electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic resection of colorectal neoplasm.

Qi Zhipeng,Li Bing,He Dongli,Shi Qiang,Ren Zhong,Cai Shilun,Cai Mingyan,Fu Peiyao,Zhu Yangbei,Zhu Liang,Xu Enpan,Zhong Yunshi
{"title":"Water cooling to prevent electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic resection of colorectal neoplasm.","authors":"Qi Zhipeng,Li Bing,He Dongli,Shi Qiang,Ren Zhong,Cai Shilun,Cai Mingyan,Fu Peiyao,Zhu Yangbei,Zhu Liang,Xu Enpan,Zhong Yunshi","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000004089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nWith the increasing frequency of electrocoagulation hemostasis used in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the incidence of postoperative bleeding is gradually decreasing, while the incidence of post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS) is gradually increasing. Water cooling can reduce thermal injury to the intestinal wall after electrocoagulation. Therefore, this study intends to conduct a prospective, multi-center randomized controlled trial to explore the effectiveness of water cooling after electrocoagulation in reducing the occurrence of PECS.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nFrom November 2022 to October 2023, 420 patients were prospectively included. The patients were 1:1 randomly divided into two groups, named the standard ESD (S-ESD) group and the water-cooled ESD (W-ESD) group. The main outcome measure was the incidence of PECS. Secondary outcomes were ESD operative time, complete resection rates, and adverse effects.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe incidence of PECS in the W-ESD group was significantly lower than that in the S-ESD group (7.6% vs. 17.1%, P = 0.003). The median operation time was also shorter in the W-ESD group than in the S-ESD group (37.0 minutes, IQR: 30.0-47.0 minutes vs 42.5 minutes, IQR: 33.0-60.0 minutes, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in specimen size between the two groups (3.8cm2, IQR: 3.1-6.3cm2 vs 4.6cm2, IQR: 3.1-7.1cm2, P = 0.286), and the complete resection rate was 100%. No perforation occurred in any patient.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nWater-cooled ESD technology can significantly reduce the occurrence of PECS.","PeriodicalId":520099,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000004089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND With the increasing frequency of electrocoagulation hemostasis used in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the incidence of postoperative bleeding is gradually decreasing, while the incidence of post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS) is gradually increasing. Water cooling can reduce thermal injury to the intestinal wall after electrocoagulation. Therefore, this study intends to conduct a prospective, multi-center randomized controlled trial to explore the effectiveness of water cooling after electrocoagulation in reducing the occurrence of PECS. METHODS From November 2022 to October 2023, 420 patients were prospectively included. The patients were 1:1 randomly divided into two groups, named the standard ESD (S-ESD) group and the water-cooled ESD (W-ESD) group. The main outcome measure was the incidence of PECS. Secondary outcomes were ESD operative time, complete resection rates, and adverse effects. RESULTS The incidence of PECS in the W-ESD group was significantly lower than that in the S-ESD group (7.6% vs. 17.1%, P = 0.003). The median operation time was also shorter in the W-ESD group than in the S-ESD group (37.0 minutes, IQR: 30.0-47.0 minutes vs 42.5 minutes, IQR: 33.0-60.0 minutes, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in specimen size between the two groups (3.8cm2, IQR: 3.1-6.3cm2 vs 4.6cm2, IQR: 3.1-7.1cm2, P = 0.286), and the complete resection rate was 100%. No perforation occurred in any patient. CONCLUSION Water-cooled ESD technology can significantly reduce the occurrence of PECS.
水冷术预防内镜下结直肠肿瘤切除术后电凝综合征。
背景随着内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD)电凝止血应用频率的增加,术后出血的发生率逐渐降低,而ESD后电凝综合征(PECS)的发生率逐渐增加。水冷却可减少电凝后对肠壁的热损伤。因此,本研究拟开展前瞻性、多中心随机对照试验,探讨电凝后水冷却对减少PECS发生的有效性。方法:2022年11月至2023年10月,前瞻性纳入420例患者。将患者按1:1随机分为标准ESD (S-ESD)组和水冷式ESD (W-ESD)组。主要结局指标为PECS的发生率。次要结果是ESD手术时间、完全切除率和不良反应。结果W-ESD组PECS发生率明显低于S-ESD组(7.6% vs. 17.1%, P = 0.003)。W-ESD组的中位手术时间也短于S-ESD组(37.0 min, IQR: 30.0 ~ 47.0 min vs 42.5 min, IQR: 33.0 ~ 60.0 min, P < 0.001)。两组间标本大小差异无统计学意义(3.8cm2, IQR: 3.1 ~ 6.3cm2 vs 4.6cm2, IQR: 3.1 ~ 7.1cm2, P = 0.286),全切除率为100%。所有患者均未出现穿孔。结论水冷式ESD技术可显著减少PECS的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书