Psychopathy in the context of adversity: Understanding associations of early-life adversity and psychopathic symptoms in a sample of justice-involved youth.
Emma Louise Rodgers,Marie L Gillespie,Scarlet J Cho,Elizabeth Cauffman
{"title":"Psychopathy in the context of adversity: Understanding associations of early-life adversity and psychopathic symptoms in a sample of justice-involved youth.","authors":"Emma Louise Rodgers,Marie L Gillespie,Scarlet J Cho,Elizabeth Cauffman","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nPsychopathic symptoms have long been studied in samples of justice-involved youth. Collectively, findings suggest early-life adversities (ELAs) like abuse and maltreatment are linked with increases in symptomology. Yet these studies infrequently consider the wider definitions of ELA utilized by many researchers across fields of developmental and Health Psychology, which also include experiences of general household dysfunction.\r\n\r\nHYPOTHESES\r\nGreater ELA exposure will be associated with increases in psychopathic symptomology, both at study outset and across time. Additionally, ELA will be more strongly linked to behavioral symptoms than emotional or social symptoms.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nThe present study utilized publicly available data from a large, longitudinal sample of justice-involved males (the Pathways to Desistance study; Mage = 16.09 years at baseline, 42.4% African American, 34.0% Hispanic American, 18.9% non-Hispanic White, 2.2% Native American, and 2.5% other race/ethnicity) to generate a new (to the data set) measure of ELA modeled after the popular Adverse Childhood Experience questionnaire that included nine unique categories of adversity. This scale was used to predict (a) overall psychopathic symptoms and subscales at baseline (using an interview-based measure) and (b) trajectories of change in symptoms across the study period (using a self-report measure, covering 7 years of development).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nResults indicate that general ELA is associated with psychopathic symptoms at baseline and was not associated with rates of change across time (though patterns vary by subdimension). Analyses comparing types of adversity (abuse and neglect vs. household dysfunction) suggest this effect is imparted by abuse and neglect and not broader environmental dysfunction. These results were consistent after accounting for co-occurring anxiety, which is sometimes used to explore primary and secondary variants of psychopathy.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThese results add to existing literature linking serious adversity to psychopathic symptoms and extend findings by considering type of adversity for the first time longitudinally in a sample of justice-involved youth. Findings are situated within developmental theories of psychopathy in relation to ELA, and practical implications of the findings for practitioners and policy makers are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000668","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Psychopathic symptoms have long been studied in samples of justice-involved youth. Collectively, findings suggest early-life adversities (ELAs) like abuse and maltreatment are linked with increases in symptomology. Yet these studies infrequently consider the wider definitions of ELA utilized by many researchers across fields of developmental and Health Psychology, which also include experiences of general household dysfunction.
HYPOTHESES
Greater ELA exposure will be associated with increases in psychopathic symptomology, both at study outset and across time. Additionally, ELA will be more strongly linked to behavioral symptoms than emotional or social symptoms.
METHOD
The present study utilized publicly available data from a large, longitudinal sample of justice-involved males (the Pathways to Desistance study; Mage = 16.09 years at baseline, 42.4% African American, 34.0% Hispanic American, 18.9% non-Hispanic White, 2.2% Native American, and 2.5% other race/ethnicity) to generate a new (to the data set) measure of ELA modeled after the popular Adverse Childhood Experience questionnaire that included nine unique categories of adversity. This scale was used to predict (a) overall psychopathic symptoms and subscales at baseline (using an interview-based measure) and (b) trajectories of change in symptoms across the study period (using a self-report measure, covering 7 years of development).
RESULTS
Results indicate that general ELA is associated with psychopathic symptoms at baseline and was not associated with rates of change across time (though patterns vary by subdimension). Analyses comparing types of adversity (abuse and neglect vs. household dysfunction) suggest this effect is imparted by abuse and neglect and not broader environmental dysfunction. These results were consistent after accounting for co-occurring anxiety, which is sometimes used to explore primary and secondary variants of psychopathy.
CONCLUSIONS
These results add to existing literature linking serious adversity to psychopathic symptoms and extend findings by considering type of adversity for the first time longitudinally in a sample of justice-involved youth. Findings are situated within developmental theories of psychopathy in relation to ELA, and practical implications of the findings for practitioners and policy makers are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Law and Human Behavior, the official journal of the American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association, is a multidisciplinary forum for the publication of articles and discussions of issues arising out of the relationships between human behavior and the law, our legal system, and the legal process. This journal publishes original research, reviews of past research, and theoretical studies from professionals in criminal justice, law, psychology, sociology, psychiatry, political science, education, communication, and other areas germane to the field.