The impact of "relational" Artificial Intelligence on human well-being: A self-determination theory analysis.

IF 6.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Michael A Irias,Norman B Schmidt,Thomas E Joiner,James K McNulty
{"title":"The impact of \"relational\" Artificial Intelligence on human well-being: A self-determination theory analysis.","authors":"Michael A Irias,Norman B Schmidt,Thomas E Joiner,James K McNulty","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have given rise to relational AI-AI agents that mimic human relational capabilities while possessing unique nonhuman features, including constant availability, extensive malleability, and a lack of intrinsic psychological needs. This article uses self-determination theory to examine how relational AI may support or undermine the three basic psychological needs self-determination theory posits as essential for well-being: relatedness, competence, and autonomy. Across roles including that of tutor, copilot, social mediator, companion, and therapist, relational AI may address critical challenges to these needs, facilitating goal attainment, alleviating loneliness, and promoting mental health. However, relational AI also carries potential risks for well-being, including reduced self-direction, diminished efficacy, and altered expectations within human relationships. We propose that relational AI's ultimate impact on users' well-being will depend on moderating factors that may shape both the strength and direction of its effects on well-being, including users' motivational orientation toward the goal for which they use relational AI, their motivational orientation for using relational AI, their baseline psychological need satisfaction, dynamics particular to each relational AI role, and various situational factors. Crucially, it is likely impossible to fully understand relational AI's impacts on well-being without examining all three psychological needs, as focusing on only a single need risks overlooking dynamics in which impacts on multiple needs interact to amplify or neutralize well-being. Future research on these processes can deepen our understanding of human relationship dynamics, inform responsible AI development, and reveal novel theoretical mechanisms underlying relational AI's impacts on well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000528","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have given rise to relational AI-AI agents that mimic human relational capabilities while possessing unique nonhuman features, including constant availability, extensive malleability, and a lack of intrinsic psychological needs. This article uses self-determination theory to examine how relational AI may support or undermine the three basic psychological needs self-determination theory posits as essential for well-being: relatedness, competence, and autonomy. Across roles including that of tutor, copilot, social mediator, companion, and therapist, relational AI may address critical challenges to these needs, facilitating goal attainment, alleviating loneliness, and promoting mental health. However, relational AI also carries potential risks for well-being, including reduced self-direction, diminished efficacy, and altered expectations within human relationships. We propose that relational AI's ultimate impact on users' well-being will depend on moderating factors that may shape both the strength and direction of its effects on well-being, including users' motivational orientation toward the goal for which they use relational AI, their motivational orientation for using relational AI, their baseline psychological need satisfaction, dynamics particular to each relational AI role, and various situational factors. Crucially, it is likely impossible to fully understand relational AI's impacts on well-being without examining all three psychological needs, as focusing on only a single need risks overlooking dynamics in which impacts on multiple needs interact to amplify or neutralize well-being. Future research on these processes can deepen our understanding of human relationship dynamics, inform responsible AI development, and reveal novel theoretical mechanisms underlying relational AI's impacts on well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
“关系型”人工智能对人类福祉的影响:一个自决理论分析。
生成式人工智能(AI)的进步催生了关系型AI-AI代理,它们模仿人类的关系能力,同时拥有独特的非人类特征,包括持续可用性、广泛的延展性和缺乏内在的心理需求。本文使用自我决定理论来研究关系型人工智能如何支持或破坏自我决定理论认为对幸福至关重要的三个基本心理需求:相关性、能力和自主性。关系人工智能的角色包括导师、副驾驶、社会调解人、伴侣和治疗师,可以解决这些需求的关键挑战,促进目标实现,减轻孤独感,促进心理健康。然而,关系型人工智能也会带来潜在的健康风险,包括自我导向的降低、效率的降低以及人际关系中期望的改变。我们提出,关系型人工智能对用户幸福感的最终影响将取决于可能影响其对幸福感影响的强度和方向的调节因素,包括用户对使用关系型人工智能的目标的动机取向、他们使用关系型人工智能的动机取向、他们的基线心理需求满足、每个关系型人工智能角色的特定动态以及各种情境因素。至关重要的是,如果不检查所有三种心理需求,可能不可能完全理解关系人工智能对幸福感的影响,因为只关注单一需求可能会忽视对多种需求的影响相互作用以放大或中和幸福感的动态。未来对这些过程的研究可以加深我们对人类关系动态的理解,为负责任的人工智能开发提供信息,并揭示关系人工智能对幸福感影响的新理论机制。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: Journal of personality and social psychology publishes original papers in all areas of personality and social psychology and emphasizes empirical reports, but may include specialized theoretical, methodological, and review papers.Journal of personality and social psychology is divided into three independently edited sections. Attitudes and Social Cognition addresses all aspects of psychology (e.g., attitudes, cognition, emotion, motivation) that take place in significant micro- and macrolevel social contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书