Safety-critical odor identification failure and cognitive performance in older U.S. adults: a cross-sectional NHANES analysis.

IF 2.1
Soheil Yazdi
{"title":"Safety-critical odor identification failure and cognitive performance in older U.S. adults: a cross-sectional NHANES analysis.","authors":"Soheil Yazdi","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acag047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Olfactory dysfunction is linked to cognitive decline, but the cognitive significance of failing to identify safety-critical odors is unclear.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2014 study examined associations between missed smoke/natural gas odors and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Animal Fluency, and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) Delayed Recall scores among 1677 adults aged ≥60 years using survey-weighted regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After demographic and clinical adjustment, each additional missed warning odor was associated with lower DSST (β = -4.77; 95% CI: -6.78 to -2.76), Animal Fluency (β = -0.96), and CERAD scores (β = -0.68). The DSST association remained significant after adjustment for general olfactory performance (β = -4.06; p = .022). Among participants missing ≥1 warning odor, 447/511 (87.5%) reported no smell problem.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Safety-critical odor failure may capture cognitive information beyond global olfactory performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":"41 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acag047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Olfactory dysfunction is linked to cognitive decline, but the cognitive significance of failing to identify safety-critical odors is unclear.

Method: This cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2014 study examined associations between missed smoke/natural gas odors and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Animal Fluency, and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) Delayed Recall scores among 1677 adults aged ≥60 years using survey-weighted regression.

Results: After demographic and clinical adjustment, each additional missed warning odor was associated with lower DSST (β = -4.77; 95% CI: -6.78 to -2.76), Animal Fluency (β = -0.96), and CERAD scores (β = -0.68). The DSST association remained significant after adjustment for general olfactory performance (β = -4.06; p = .022). Among participants missing ≥1 warning odor, 447/511 (87.5%) reported no smell problem.

Conclusions: Safety-critical odor failure may capture cognitive information beyond global olfactory performance.

美国老年人安全关键气味识别失败和认知表现:横断面NHANES分析。
目的:嗅觉功能障碍与认知能力下降有关,但未能识别安全关键气味的认知意义尚不清楚。方法:这项2013-2014年全国健康与营养调查的横断研究使用调查加权回归分析了1677名年龄≥60岁的成年人中遗漏的烟雾/天然气气味与数字符号替代测试(DSST)、动物流畅性和阿尔茨海默病注册协会(CERAD)延迟回忆得分之间的关系。结果:经过人口统计学和临床调整后,每多漏掉一个警告气味,DSST (β = -4.77; 95% CI: -6.78至-2.76)、动物流畅性(β = -0.96)和CERAD评分(β = -0.68)均降低。调整一般嗅觉性能后,DSST相关性仍然显著(β = -4.06; p = 0.022)。在缺少≥1种警示气味的参与者中,447/511(87.5%)报告没有气味问题。结论:安全关键气味失败可能捕获超越全局嗅觉表现的认知信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书