Machine learning for prediction of key haemodynamic parameters in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

IF 4.4 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2026-06-18 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf074
Tilmann Kramer, Henning Weis, Mira Kramer, Stephan Baldus, Stephan Rosenkranz, Stefan Spinler
{"title":"Machine learning for prediction of key haemodynamic parameters in pulmonary arterial hypertension.","authors":"Tilmann Kramer, Henning Weis, Mira Kramer, Stephan Baldus, Stephan Rosenkranz, Stefan Spinler","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Machine learning (ML) is increasingly recognized for its ability to identify and structure variables for predictive tasks. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease characterized by elevated mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) with normal pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP), as assessed by right heart catheterization (RHC). Despite increased awareness, delays between onset of non-specific symptoms and diagnosis continue to hinder early initiation of targeted therapies, leading to poorer outcomes. To develop and evaluate ML models for predicting key haemodynamic parameters in PAH, based on routinely available non-invasive data collected within 8 weeks prior to RHC, as a proof of concept.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We analysed data from 181 patients with invasively confirmed PAH, incorporating 56 variables, including demographics, echocardiography, blood gas analyses, 6-min walk distances, laboratory tests, and WHO functional class. An 80/20 train-test split and fivefold cross-validation were applied across multiple ML models, including least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) regression, ridge regression, k-nearest neighbours, decision trees, random forest, and gradient boosting machine. Lasso achieved best performance for predicting mPAP (<i>r</i> = 0.80, <i>R</i>² = 0.64, RMSE = 8.49). For PVR, ridge performed best (<i>r</i> = 0.71, <i>R</i>² = 0.51, RMSE = 3.60). Random forest and gradient boosting machines achieved modest but consistent performance for cardiac index (<i>r</i> = 0.38 and 0.37), while PAWP prediction remained limited across all models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning models can estimate mPAP and PVR from routine clinical data obtained prior to RHC in patients with confirmed PAH. External validation is required to confirm generalizability and clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"7 5","pages":"ztaf074"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13276432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Machine learning (ML) is increasingly recognized for its ability to identify and structure variables for predictive tasks. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease characterized by elevated mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) with normal pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP), as assessed by right heart catheterization (RHC). Despite increased awareness, delays between onset of non-specific symptoms and diagnosis continue to hinder early initiation of targeted therapies, leading to poorer outcomes. To develop and evaluate ML models for predicting key haemodynamic parameters in PAH, based on routinely available non-invasive data collected within 8 weeks prior to RHC, as a proof of concept.

Methods and results: We analysed data from 181 patients with invasively confirmed PAH, incorporating 56 variables, including demographics, echocardiography, blood gas analyses, 6-min walk distances, laboratory tests, and WHO functional class. An 80/20 train-test split and fivefold cross-validation were applied across multiple ML models, including least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) regression, ridge regression, k-nearest neighbours, decision trees, random forest, and gradient boosting machine. Lasso achieved best performance for predicting mPAP (r = 0.80, R² = 0.64, RMSE = 8.49). For PVR, ridge performed best (r = 0.71, R² = 0.51, RMSE = 3.60). Random forest and gradient boosting machines achieved modest but consistent performance for cardiac index (r = 0.38 and 0.37), while PAWP prediction remained limited across all models.

Conclusion: Machine learning models can estimate mPAP and PVR from routine clinical data obtained prior to RHC in patients with confirmed PAH. External validation is required to confirm generalizability and clinical applicability.

预测肺动脉高压关键血流动力学参数的机器学习。
目的:机器学习(ML)因其识别和构建预测任务变量的能力而越来越受到认可。肺动脉高压(PAH)是一种进行性疾病,其特征是平均肺动脉压(mPAP)和肺血管阻力(PVR)升高,肺动脉楔压(PAWP)正常,通过右心导管(RHC)评估。尽管认识有所提高,但在非特异性症状发作和诊断之间的延迟继续阻碍早期开始靶向治疗,导致较差的结果。基于RHC前8周内常规可获得的无创数据,开发和评估预测PAH关键血流动力学参数的ML模型,作为概念验证。方法和结果:我们分析了181例经侵袭性确诊的PAH患者的数据,纳入56个变量,包括人口统计学、超声心动图、血气分析、6分钟步行距离、实验室检查和WHO功能分级。80/20训练测试分割和五倍交叉验证应用于多个ML模型,包括最小绝对收缩和选择算子(lasso)回归、脊回归、k近邻、决策树、随机森林和梯度增强机。Lasso预测mPAP的效果最好(r = 0.80, r²= 0.64,RMSE = 8.49)。对于PVR,脊型表现最佳(r = 0.71, r²= 0.51,RMSE = 3.60)。随机森林和梯度增强机器在心脏指数上取得了适度但一致的表现(r = 0.38和0.37),而PAWP预测在所有模型中仍然有限。结论:机器学习模型可以根据确诊PAH患者在RHC之前获得的常规临床数据估计mPAP和PVR。需要外部验证来确认推广和临床适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书