Professional Compromise and Its Association with Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Patient Satisfaction Among Physicians in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2026-06-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S601873
Yulin Zeng, Ping Han
{"title":"Professional Compromise and Its Association with Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Patient Satisfaction Among Physicians in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital.","authors":"Yulin Zeng, Ping Han","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S601873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physician burnout poses a global challenge to healthcare systems. Professional compromise-pressure on physicians to deviate from clinical judgment or professional standards due to systemic constraints-may contribute to burnout, yet evidence from non-Western settings remains limited. This study examined the prevalence of professional compromise among physicians at a Chinese tertiary hospital and its associations with burnout, job satisfaction, turnover intention, and departmental patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted between January and March 2025 at a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province, China (n=120 physicians; 10 clinical departments; response rate 80.0%). Professional compromise was measured with a validated five-item instrument adapted from the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals; burnout was assessed using the Emotional Exhaustion subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (licensed from Mind Garden, Inc). Pearson correlations, independent t-tests, and chi-square tests examined associations; effect sizes were quantified using Cohen's d and odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean professional compromise score was 3.85 (SD 0.55) on a 1-5 scale, with 50.0% of physicians reporting frequent compromise (score ≥4). Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Emergency Medicine departments exhibited the highest compromise rates. Professional compromise correlated positively with burnout (r=0.587, p<0.001) and negatively with job satisfaction (r=-0.347, p<0.001). High-compromise physicians had substantially higher burnout (Cohen's d=0.97), lower job satisfaction (Cohen's d=0.57), and greater turnover intention (55.0% vs. 28.3%; OR=3.09, 95% CI 1.41-6.77). At the department level (n=10), professional compromise correlated negatively with patient satisfaction (r=-0.929, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Professional compromise was prevalent and robustly associated with adverse clinician outcomes. These findings suggest that systemic contributors to professional compromise warrant attention in strategies to improve clinician well-being and healthcare quality. Longitudinal multi-site research is needed to confirm these associations and evaluate targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"19 ","pages":"601873"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13282957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S601873","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physician burnout poses a global challenge to healthcare systems. Professional compromise-pressure on physicians to deviate from clinical judgment or professional standards due to systemic constraints-may contribute to burnout, yet evidence from non-Western settings remains limited. This study examined the prevalence of professional compromise among physicians at a Chinese tertiary hospital and its associations with burnout, job satisfaction, turnover intention, and departmental patient satisfaction.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between January and March 2025 at a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province, China (n=120 physicians; 10 clinical departments; response rate 80.0%). Professional compromise was measured with a validated five-item instrument adapted from the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals; burnout was assessed using the Emotional Exhaustion subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (licensed from Mind Garden, Inc). Pearson correlations, independent t-tests, and chi-square tests examined associations; effect sizes were quantified using Cohen's d and odds ratios.

Results: The mean professional compromise score was 3.85 (SD 0.55) on a 1-5 scale, with 50.0% of physicians reporting frequent compromise (score ≥4). Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Emergency Medicine departments exhibited the highest compromise rates. Professional compromise correlated positively with burnout (r=0.587, p<0.001) and negatively with job satisfaction (r=-0.347, p<0.001). High-compromise physicians had substantially higher burnout (Cohen's d=0.97), lower job satisfaction (Cohen's d=0.57), and greater turnover intention (55.0% vs. 28.3%; OR=3.09, 95% CI 1.41-6.77). At the department level (n=10), professional compromise correlated negatively with patient satisfaction (r=-0.929, p<0.001).

Conclusion: Professional compromise was prevalent and robustly associated with adverse clinician outcomes. These findings suggest that systemic contributors to professional compromise warrant attention in strategies to improve clinician well-being and healthcare quality. Longitudinal multi-site research is needed to confirm these associations and evaluate targeted interventions.

某三级医院医师职业妥协与职业倦怠、工作满意度、患者满意度的关系
背景:医生职业倦怠对医疗保健系统构成了全球性挑战。专业上的妥协——医生迫于系统约束而偏离临床判断或专业标准的压力——可能导致职业倦怠,然而来自非西方国家的证据仍然有限。本研究考察了中国某三级医院医师职业妥协的普遍程度及其与职业倦怠、工作满意度、离职意向和科室患者满意度的关系。方法:于2025年1 - 3月在浙江省某三级医院(n=120名医生,10个临床科室,有效率80.0%)进行横断面调查。专业妥协采用经验证的五项量表进行测量,该量表改编自《医疗保健专业人员道德困扰量表》;使用马斯拉克倦怠量表的情绪衰竭子量表(由Mind Garden公司授权)评估倦怠。Pearson相关性、独立t检验和卡方检验检验了相关性;效应量采用Cohen’s d和优势比进行量化。结果:在1-5的量表中,平均专业妥协得分为3.85 (SD 0.55), 50.0%的医生报告经常妥协(得分≥4)。妇产科和急诊科的妥协率最高。职业妥协与职业倦怠正相关(r=0.587)。结论:职业妥协普遍存在,且与临床不良预后显著相关。这些发现表明,系统的贡献者的专业妥协值得关注的策略,以提高临床医生的福祉和医疗质量。需要纵向多地点研究来证实这些关联并评估有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书